• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Deleted member 2145

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
29,223
So all that bashing of m4a that goes on in poliera is a right wing talking point...? 🤔

I mean, probably? most every criticism of M4A uses some kind of right wing framing to disingenuously argue against it like harping on tax increases or conflating private insurance with the actual health care provided
 

Pekola

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,507
Morbid curiosity is leading me to ask you for a link to that thread, if you don't mind :)

They're not the only ones. It is very telling that when someone like Ilhan Omar says anything, her ability to work is put into question with words like:

"She has horrible political instinct"

And it is also telling that said criticism is usually only directed at particular progressive women of color.

The word Tokenism comes to mind. Because that's all a lot of people see. Cosmetic representation as a replacement for progressive policy.
 
Oct 25, 2017
7,523
Morbid curiosity is leading me to ask you for a link to that thread, if you don't mind :)

www.resetera.com

Congresswoman Omar ignites new anti-Semitism controversy with comments on AIPAC

Update: After Nancy Pelosi and other Dem leadership issued a statement in which they condemned anti-Semitism but also made reference to the "shared values and strategic interests" with Israel, Ilhan Omar apologized for any hurt she caused with her statements, but reiterated that all lobbying...



Knock yourself out.

I mean it, better to get knocked unconscious than sit through the dozens of posts joining in with the disingenuous right wing smear campaign while trying to frame it as being galaxy brain centrist pragmatism.
 

Kerwop

Member
Dec 15, 2017
396
Yeah rereading that is incredibly ironic considering the point (?) he was trying to make today.

I usually just lurk, but whenever I see him enter a thread I have to bail because I know he'll make bad faith arguments and post twice as much as anyone else to hijack the thread.
 

Dekim

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,300
I'm sure he's going to come into here swinging quoting everyone in one big diatribe of a post telling use how naive we are and imply we just don't understand politics.
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,351
User banned (2 weeks): Trolling and antagonizing other members. Long history of similar behaviour.

Deleted member 3896

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,815
Her candidacy is going absolutely nowhere, and she might not even get re-elected in Hawaii. She's a non-force in American politics except for her time-limited ability to harness chaotic energy and body candidates otherwise protected by general rules of civility. That being the case, how else can I reasonably receive her besides rolling my eyes at her few weird stans and being happy that candidates I think inferior are having their cages rattled and prospects dimmed?
So as long as this radically antigay cultist damages "candidates you think are inferior" you're happy for the, uh, work she's doing? Also, the "chaotic energy" talk is giving me legit Marianne Williamson vibes.
 

PMS341

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
6,634
People are still scared of Williamson? She was never a threat to begin with and hasn't been in a debate in how long now?
 

Deleted member 3896

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,815

Snowy

Banned
Nov 11, 2017
1,399
So as long as this radically antigay cultist damages "candidates you think are inferior" you're happy for the, uh, work she's doing? Also, the "chaotic energy" talk is giving me legit Marianne Williamson vibes.

The energy thing was obviously facetious, c'mon. The point is her incoherent politics are currently serving what I think is a useful purpose, and since I have zero concern about her becoming president, neither her policy proposals nor personal views and moral character have any bearing on how I go about my day. Politics is fundamentally about obtaining and using power, not about the personal qualities of individual political actors, so I don't see any real reason not to take some mild amusement in seeing candidates I think are bad and do not want to win the primary taken down by a crank who's not currently a threat to anyone or anything. That I thought Christie murdering Rubio in 2016 was extremely funny and satisfying is not an endorsement of that absolute ghoul, either.
 

Deleted member 3896

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,815
The energy thing was obviously facetious, c'mon. The point is her incoherent politics are currently serving what I think is a useful purpose, and since I have zero concern about her becoming president, neither her policy proposals nor personal views and moral character have any bearing on how I go about my day. Politics is fundamentally about obtaining and using power, not about the personal qualities of individual political actors, so I don't see any real reason not to take some mild amusement in seeing candidates I think are bad and do not want to win the primary taken down by a crank who's not currently a threat to anyone or anything. That I thought Christie murdering Rubio in 2016 was extremely funny and satisfying is not an endorsement of that absolute ghoul, either.
Great, so white nationalist Tucker Carlson's favorite candidate-- one who has been empowered by right wing extremists-- is wielding that power in a way that you enjoy. Super gross to me but hey, you do you.
 

Deleted member 48897

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 22, 2018
13,623
I usually just lurk, but whenever I see him enter a thread I have to bail because I know he'll make bad faith arguments and post twice as much as anyone else to hijack the thread.

I believe he was the one who I asked if he would convince his moderate friends to vote Sanders, and said he never would.
This was in arguing that Biden was more electable and we lefty folks need to be willing to vote against Trump.



I think about the unstated contradiction in his reasoning a lot
 

Deleted member 22490

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
9,237
Yeah rereading that is incredibly ironic considering the point (?) he was trying to make today.

I usually just lurk, but whenever I see him enter a thread I have to bail because I know he'll make bad faith arguments and post twice as much as anyone else to hijack the thread.
I remember when he blamed the kids in the sunrise movement for not doing better to convince the democrats in power to do better on climate change
 

Deleted member 22490

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
9,237
How was kaylaz post antagonistic?
Because it violated this staff post Cerium made in the Socialist and PoliEra OTs (and no where else)
Official Staff Communication
Note: This staff message has been posted in both the PoliEra and Socialism OTs, but they will be enforced across the site.

Fighting between communities has been getting worse lately, and that ends now. It's ruined too many threads at this point and it's been a constant breach of the terms of service. It's unfair to everyone else who uses this site that a small minority has been turning large swaths of EtcetEra toxic. Many users have complained about this to us and we believe they are right to do so.

In that past we've relied on ordinary bans with gradual escalation, in the hopes that this would be enough to ensure that everyone can coexist. It hasn't been enough. Users have instead resorted to trolling in subtler ways, hoping that the staff won't notice or mind. To deter this, we will now be issuing much longer bans and rapidly escalate them as hard as necessary.

There have been a handful of recurring offenders on both sides in this – you know who you are. The following goes for everyone but especially for you: The pejoratives, nicknames, turns of phrase and other creative aggressions will no longer be tolerated. Attempts to provoke one another, to gatekeep, to deliberately keep the fighting going, will no longer be tolerated. Going back to your respective OTs to whine and complain about each other will no longer be tolerated.

It all stops now. Do not complain that you were not warned.
 

Deffers

Banned
Mar 4, 2018
2,402
Because it violated this staff post Cerium made in the Socialist and PoliEra OTs (and no where else)
Yeah, has Kaylaz even stopped by our OT to... yunno... see staff post?

And how about Bronx-Man? Is it wrong to cheer on when posters get banned now? I thought we were pretty chill with that.
 

BADMAN

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,887
Wow wait up a second. You're telling me that the thread in it's 10th iteration has a protection waver from a thread with 8000 posts since 2017 and that can be used sitewide to ban people for making posts that refer to PoliEra?

Cool seems balanced.
 

BADMAN

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,887

Deleted member 3896

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,815
Yeah there are a few exceptions to the rule but the assumption should never be that the VP will fix a bad President
I mean it also seems that Pence has a lot of sway, honestly, although that feels connected to a larger archconservative body.

I would definitely not assume that any VP would "fix" a bad president. Biden is a bad choice and even a great VP, at least for me, isn't going to make him suddenly an attractive candidate. That said, I do really wish Harris was better and had more accountability and had made more amends for past poor choices.
 

Chaos Legion

The Wise Ones
Member
Oct 30, 2017
16,905
The VP is a largely powerless role and Harris being there wouldn't change anything about his administration.
True, but I look at Biden as at best a transitional president. I doubt he would run for a second term. So, assuming he wins the presidency, his VP choice is very important, as that person likely becomes the frontrunner in 2024 (assuming Biden's administration isn't a shit show). Of the likely choices he could choose (he mentioned it'd be ridiculous to not have a PoC woman as a running mate), Kamala would be a great choice.

That said, there are other concerns (his age, effect on brain surgery he had, rigors of office) that make me want a very capable VP. Additionally, the Senate may be close enough that the VP's job actually may be important in order to push legislation through.
 

pigeon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,447
User Banned (1 week): antagonizing other users
referring to a certain thread by name in any pejorative fashion has been a bannable offense for a while now. draw your own conclusions as to why

I assume it would apply to both poliera and socialism-era, it's just hard to tell because, with one or two notable exceptions, poliera posters are not given to making sweeping attacks on socialism-era as a community.

Draw your own conclusions as to why!

Mod edit: user edit reverted
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BADMAN

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,887
True, but I look at Biden as at best a transitional president. I doubt he would run for a second term. So, assuming he wins the presidency, his VP choice is very important, as that person likely becomes the frontrunner in 2024 (assuming Biden's administration isn't a shit show). Of the likely choices he could choose (he mentioned it'd be ridiculous to not have a PoC woman as a running mate), Kamala would be a great choice.

That said, there are other concerns (his age, effect on brain surgery he had, rigors of office) that make me want a very capable VP. Additionally, the Senate may be close enough that the VP's job actually may be important in order to push legislation through.
Them's some big assumptions as to Biden's overall goals and ambition. I mean feel free to open up to a Biden/Kamala ticket but don't set your hopes too high.
 

Chaos Legion

The Wise Ones
Member
Oct 30, 2017
16,905
Them's some big assumptions as to Biden's overall goals and ambition. I mean feel free to open up to a Biden/Kamala ticket but don't set your hopes too high.
I'm used to it. I've been routinely disappointed this year, I was a Beto (specifically Beto/Harris ticket) supporter, after all.
 

BADMAN

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,887
I'm used to it. I've been routinely disappointed this year, I was a Beto (specifically Beto/Harris ticket) supporter, after all.
Damn, well my friend if you're tired of being disappointed, maybe it's time to make a change. Might I recommend to you one Mr. Bernard Sanders as a candidate of choice?