Wouldn't that make him complicit in child porn? That seems like bad news for him
Wouldn't that make him complicit in child porn? That seems like bad news for him
that is a really outrageous accusation... let's hold off before we bring out the pitchforks.
But do you actually know anything?I've been screaming for years about how Randy Pitchford is a scumbag. This is unfortunately not surprising to me. There has always been something about him that just seemed off to me. Hopefully the trial will result in the truth coming out. I just hope nobody at Gearbox (except Randy) loses their jobs as a result of this lawsuit.
Callender also accuses Pitchford of holding parties in which "adult men have reportedly exposed themselves to minors, to the amusement of Randy Pitchford."
Too many people here seem to think or imply that because he is accused in this lawsuit that it means that it is true with no doubts.
They are accusations at best right now, calm down.
Callender's most lurid allegation against Pitchford is an accusation surrounding an event that he says occurred in 2014. Callender says that Pitchford left a USB drive in a Dallas, Texas restaurant containing sensitive corporate documents for Gearbox and its partners including 2K Games, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, and others. Says the lawsuit: "Upon information and belief, Randy Pitchford's USB drive also contained Randy Pitchford's personal collection of 'underage' pornography."
Callender also accuses Pitchford of holding parties in which "adult men have reportedly exposed themselves to minors, to the amusement of Randy Pitchford."
Says the lawsuit: "Upon information and belief, Randy Pitchford's USB drive also contained Randy Pitchford's personal collection of 'underage' pornography."
Callender also accuses Pitchford of holding parties in which "adult men have reportedly exposed themselves to minors, to the amusement of Randy Pitchford."
Do you say this with any accusation made against predators or just right now because he's a prominent dev?
Callender also accuses Pitchford of holding parties in which "adult men have reportedly exposed themselves to minors, to the amusement of Randy Pitchford."
Do you say this with any accusation made against predators or just right now because he's a prominent dev?
If these accusations are true I hope he rots in jail for the rest of his life. What a monster.
Too true :(
Can you explain why this lawyer is likely legally covered even if they claim they knew about these things before? I'm pretty sure I know why but I'm not a lawyer.Re. the porn, "on information and belief" means they almost certainly don't have any primary or first-hand evidence. That's my understanding as a lawyer. I could be wrong.
Oh fuck right off. Because one of the mods at the old site was a pedo everyone here is too?This forum has no moral standpoint in taking the high ground on a child pornography accusation.
This question seems a little loaded. Do you bring this point up anytime someone mentions waiting for evidence or only when people have preconceived opinions about the accused?
I would hope this applies to every situation, but regardless, it is still a good suggestion to wait for further evidence before immediately believing every accusation.
I'll say it's because this guy is getting sued by Gearbox for millions himself for misuse of corporate cards and such
When millions of dollars are on the line you go hard in the paint or you go home
I wanted to do this. Well done.
This forum has no moral standpoint in taking the high ground on a child pornography accusation.
Do you say this with any accusation made against predators or just right now because he's a prominent dev?
Litigation privilege/immunity.If Schrier said it's hearsay, this is bound to lead to a countersuit for defamation
It's a reverse clickbait
Oh fuck right off. Because one of the mods at the old site was a pedo everyone here is too?
So this is what it looks like to say the dumbest thingThis forum has no moral standpoint in taking the high ground on a child pornography accusation.
This forum has no moral standpoint in taking the high ground on a child pornography accusation.
Most of those threads turn in to a honeypot where people defending the sexualization or rationalization of that get permed.Continuous blind-eye turning towards concerning posts and the defense of "ephebophilic" tendencies of some users, actually.