I genuinely don't mean that as snark.
I'm not fully clued in on their plans for 2019. I bought one for Pokemon Lets go and love it.
Eshop prices are disgraceful tho.
I genuinely don't mean that as snark.
That's fair. SotC does not fit that list very well.SotC is anything but story driven, nor is it Cinematic. Like yeah they have realistic graphics, but the artstyle in all 4 is completely different.
They're all MLB The Show clones.How Detroit, Shadow of the Colossus, God of War and Spiderman can be considered samey?
Yes and we're still using those same arguments from thousands of years ago, showing that we've exhausted the finite limits of that debate thousand of years ago. Very little, if anything new, as been said about morality in YEARS. Were Plato and co's argument any less "valid" when they were 1st conceived purely because they were in the infancy of the debate? Clearly not seen as I've said we're still going back to them....What.
Morality is a set of value judgements based upon a subjective truth, certainly, but that subjective truth is anchored to notions of "what maximizes the most happiness"—something philosophers have argued over *for millenia*. A video game console "debate" is anchored on nothing. Opinions about a piece of media extend only from that media. They cannot be any more valid than any other opinion on that media.
You can't claim that "WELL MORALITY IS SUBJECTIVE" is on the same scale of argument as a *game console*.
All are realistic looking, story driven cinematic third person games.
Same goes for HZD and UC4 or the Last of US.
On the other hand Nintendo has only cartoony and stylized games.
Ironically the only really diverse first party games lineup has Microsoft.
But criticizing a console's lineup because those games were also available on a different machine the author prefers is weird as fuck. It's like the Persona 5 review that had "not on Switch" as one of the cons.
This thread is emblematic of the intensifying system wars going on lately on Era.
What is this bullshit?While all these games were good, or at least competent, they're also kind of samey.
I'm still floored by the part that wrote off the PS4's indie offerings because the author likes the Switch better. That's straight out of an ERA shitpost.
Oh I figured you were not being fanboyish lol.I genuinely don't mean that as snark.
I'm not fully clued in on their plans for 2019. I bought one for Pokemon Lets go and love it.
Eshop prices are disgraceful tho.
I seriously wonder what the mods will do as next generation nears by. This is going to get way worst.This thread is emblematic of the intensifying system wars going on lately on Era.
While all these games were good, or at least competent, they're also kind of samey.
While there were some interesting indies that released concurrently on the PS4 and PC, like The Swords of Ditto and Moonlighter, the response was less enthusiasm and more "when's it coming to Switch?" Swords of Ditto does not have a Switch version in the works. Moonlighter did end up on Switch. Having played both versions, it feels more at home on the Nintendo console.
Some liked that those kind of games :-)Yeah. Microsoft's 2018 lineup.
GAAS Shared open world pirate game
GAAS Co-op open world zombie game
GAAS Shared open world driving game
This is so dumb.
Alright, I've never read the review in question, just repeating what I have heard about it.That is not true. LKD (I assume you're talking about her review?) just said that she'd prefer to play a massive- and dare I say slog?- game like Persona 5 on a portable system, citing her P4G experience on Vita (not Switch) as a comparison. Fanboys then jumped to conclusions and lied to smear her and her review when her intent was totally harmless and simple. She never listed "not on Switch" as a con.
The supposed worst game for sony is critically better than most games released by XBOX this year.Huh? PS Now existed before GP and this year they added the ability to download PS4 and PS2 games.
How is Detroit a dud? It's the best selling QD game to date and critically it's above average at worst.
Like I get it a opinion piece but the author really went to town with it lol.
Oh I figured you were not being fanboyish lol.
But there legitimately is a lot slated for next year: Fire Emblem, Yoshi, Animal Crossing, Luigi's Mansion, Pokemon, Marvel Ultimate Alliance, Daemon x Machina, plus Metroid Prime 4 and Bayonetta 3 could be next year as well. This is just off the top of my head, someone posted a very nice picture listing everything slated for Switch next year, it's gonna be a good one all around.
Alright, I've never read the review in question, just repeating what I have heard about it.
The larger point remains, however- the games came out for the system, and are an additive to its library. Your own preferences about how and where you would play the games are irrelevant to a recap like this one, because they are not universal in the slightest (it's like how people like Derrick like to pretend that any game that comes out on Switch and also elsewhere is irrelevant on Switch, because better graphics on other versions mean that those are the only ones who count. No, he doesn't get to dictate what people prefer when they play games, and neither does the author of the PS4 article on Kotaku).
Didn't the thread on that article descend into chaos.Glad I didn't give them a click. These are almost as bad as the USgamer article posted the other day.
I see your check, mate, and raise you a full house.
Oh mate, you got some of the best games ever (imo) waiting for you, I'm a bit jealous. I hope you enjoy them all! Feel free to send me your FC if you ever want to play some multiplayer.Luigis mansion and metroid probably - I've never played metroid but the hype here makes me interested lol.
Still haven't got to Breath of the Wild Pokken or Mario Odyssey and that's without even Smash.
Lot of stuff to catch up on.
Thanks for correcting me at any rate, these kinds of false narratives have a tendency of getting out of hand sadly :POh yeah I totally agree with this overall sentiment just wanted to correct/inform you to what you brought up is all :)
I only know myself because I started to watch Jim's videos again and his Dark Souls Switch video brought this up and reminded me of that very embarrassing moment.
But criticizing a console's lineup because those games were also available on a different machine the author prefers is weird as fuck. It's like the Persona 5 review that had "not on Switch" as one of the cons.
Thanks man - I will of course.Oh mate, you got some of the best games ever (imo) waiting for you, I'm a bit jealous. I hope you enjoy them all! Feel free to send me your FC if you ever want to play some multiplayer.
Thanks for correcting me at any rate, these kinds of false narratives have a tendency of getting out of hand sadly :P
That PlayStation bit was extremely weird. They even try to make us knowing The Last of Us II, Ghost of Tsushima, Dreams, Death Stranding, and Days Gone are coming soon into a negative because we don't have exact dates yet.
Who cares? The games look great and they'll be out when they're ready.
I mean if you're going to dismiss the Switch as just "the author's personal preference" and not the game changer it has been for many people's video game consuming habits, then obviously you are not looking at the big picture as to why this is such a widespread sentiment.
People like an underdog I guess.What's with the doom and gloom about Sony for past year? I understand all this articles and hot takes doesn't matter much because Sony actually delivers on the quality and quantity.
What's the reason for this negativity?
Didn't the thread on that article descend into chaos.
The writer has some.... Interesting thoughts.
By interesting... Bizarre at most points.
I'm not dismissing anything, the author is free to prefer the Switch for their gaming (I do too). My point is that his personal gaming habits are irrelevant when considering the library additions to a console's lineup. It's like when people try to dismiss a Switch version of a game because the PS4 version looks better- doesn't matter, the game came to Switch, and for a whole lot of people who would rather have the Switch's convenience over the PS4's graphics, it's an addition.I mean if you're going to dismiss the Switch as just "the author's personal preference" and not the game changer it has been for many people's video game consuming habits, then obviously you are not looking at the big picture as to why this is such a widespread sentiment.
I remember the 360/ps3/wii era. Majority of the western media was in the tank for MS. Article like this doesn't surprise meGood article downplays PlayStation and promote and praise Xbox. Do not care about what preference He has but the article in a gaming website was supposed to be neutral.
Yes and we're still using those same arguments from thousands of years ago, showing that we've exhausted the finite limits of that debate thousand of years ago. Very little, if anything new, as been said about morality in YEARS. Were Plato and co's argument any less "valid" when they were 1st conceived purely because they were in the infancy of the debate? Clearly not seen as I've said we're still going back to them.
Just because videos haven't been around for millenia doesn't mean we haven't reached an exhaustive notion by which we can anchor opinions/arguments to.
The problem is that a few users who start that always get free pass.I seriously wonder what the mods will do as next generation nears by. This is going to get way worst.
Yeah that's another thing about the quotes in the OP that made me tilt my head. A ton of people use PS Now to play games, more than game enthusiast sites may realize.When it comes to PS Now lets us not forget Nielson's data.
https://www.pcgamesinsider.biz/news...scription-services-generated-273m-in-q3-2018/
Yes and we're still using those same arguments from thousands of years ago, showing that we've exhausted the finite limits of that debate thousand of years ago. Very little, if anything new, as been said about morality in YEARS. Were Plato and co's argument any less "valid" when they were 1st conceived purely because they were in the infancy of the debate? Clearly not seen as I've said we're still going back to them.
Of course it means a lot...all they have to do is announce backwards compatibility for those 90 million players and they will feel the push to stay in the PlayStation ecosystem, along with it being the place where their friends play.I see the complacency they are talking about. Sony is coasting into Next Gen with no signs of hunger. 90 million units don't mean much when you have to start back at zero against a competitor that is starved for a win after an embarrassing loss and not focusing on TV, TV, TV this time around.
I see the complacency they are talking about. Sony is coasting into Next Gen with no signs of hunger. 90 million units don't mean much when you have to start back at zero against a competitor that is starved for a win after an embarrassing loss and not focusing on TV, TV, TV this time around.