when you get permabanned for yet another ToU violation (my bet's on trolling or otherwise just bad-faith posting like this whole I Have All The Answers And By God I Will Ignore What The Data Says To Convey Them shtick) will anyone shed a tear
when you get permabanned for yet another ToU violation (my bet's on trolling or otherwise just bad-faith posting like this whole I Have All The Answers And By God I Will Ignore What The Data Says To Convey Them shtick) will anyone shed a tear
when you get permabanned for yet another ToU violation will anyone shed a tear
You could perhaps wait to see the results in MI, PA, and WI this year before making such an assertion.You gotta look at the long game. If trump wins in 2020 hes nominating 3 50 year old republican supreme court judges and then you can cry about every issue you want and it wont matter because that court is that way for 40 years at least. But the moral victory is all that matters right now the 40 year of damage
haha yeah let's just piss away every nonwhite part of our governing coalition so we can appeal to all the dipshits who saw the racist sexist sexual assaulting six-time-bankrupt syphilitic shitgibbon and decided they wanted to vote for him
alternately, like seemingly every candidate who's won a special election or is leading in next next week's general, let's not do that
what resetera wants as president is pretty fucking irrelevant to. Since this place is far from the majority of what most voters want or will vote for.
You gotta look at the long game. If trump wins in 2020 hes nominating 3 50 year old republican supreme court judges and then you can cry about every issue you want and it wont matter because that court is that way for 40 years at least. But the moral victory is all that matters right now the 40 year of damage
The number of people endorsing this is why many minorities scoff at the idea of "allies"
Yeah, one party's winning the former all around the country and the other's sitting around with their thumbs up their asses thinking they're guaranteed to hold onto the latterThere's a difference between state and local elections and the presidency.
The number of people endorsing this is why many minorities scoff at the idea of "allies"
For whatever it's worth, I'm convinced the easiest win is Tulsi Gabbard if she runs.
and to be clear, this is the same Gillum who was already running approximately 3% ahead of the Extremely White and Milquetoast Gwen Graham before winning that primaryYep.
Andrew Gillum about to win Florida governors race and has been running ahead of a venamint racist in a state that turn out for Trump so hard in 2016 and people here are saying just ignore that pretty much.
Well, they're not wrong about Gabbard being an easy win, just not for the Democrats
but we know that those who voted for Trump did so because of racism and sexism. All I'm saying is we have to be aware of that and turn it into a competitive advantage to get Trump out.
parkland has a lot to do with that. With the terrible way that guy treated the parkland kids after the shooting.Yep.
Andrew Gillum about to win Florida governors race and has been running ahead of a venamint racist in a state that turn out for Trump so hard in 2016 and people here are saying just ignore that pretty much.
What does Ron DeSantis, the GOP nominee for governor, have explicitly to do with Parkland?parkland has a lot to do with that. With the terrible way that guy treated the parkland kids after the shooting.
You're right, but that's why we have heuristics. If a white male argues that an intersectional coalition needs to promote and support white males to succeed, I'm going to put him down as "probably racist and sexist" because it's just quicker. If he changes my mind later, good for him.
the entire way the republican party of florida responded to the parkland shooting. Parkland reaction is a key favor of why the dems will do well in flordia.What does Ron DeSantis, the GOP nominee for governor, have explicitly to do with Parkland?
Do you mean Rick Scott, who's running for Senate?
He really doesn't. The United States has huge problems with racism and sexism, yes. But that does not necessitate, or in any way mean we should nominate a white man to run against Trump for specifically those reasons. That's neither necessary or what we absolutely should do, and in no way an appropriate response to those issues, or a necessary one in any way whatsoever. That's what he's 100% absolutely wrong about and immediately makes me raise an eyebrow that he thinks in that type of fashion.Ehhhh I dont think his intent matches how it is framed here. Hes got a point, statistically speaking, as fucked as it is.
Haha, right after I posted my remark...touchéIf only there was some sort of system that could be used to determine the most viable nominee.
So when Republicans win, it's the natural order of things. They know how to appeal to ~~~real Americans~~~. They never need last-minute assists from FBI directors or collaborations with hostile foreign powers.the entire way the republican party of florida responded to the parkland shooting. Parkland reaction is a key favor of why the dems will do well in flordia.
and Georgia? A black female candidate might win despite everything stacked against her including extreme voter suppression?parkland has a lot to do with that. With the terrible way that guy treated the parkland kids after the shooting.
What if he was a statistician stating that the odds of a white male becoming president was greater than a person of another gender or race becoming president. what would people think then? It would be a much less famous tweet that's for sure.
Thought experiment. Let's say a white male comes out infront of all the other candidates and becomes the Dem canidate. A PoC/woman splits off as an independant, but has a much less chance of winning. Who do you vote for? Are we going to bernie or bust ourselves again?
Complete nonsense strawman.Thought experiment. Let's say a white male comes out infront of all the other candidates and becomes the Dem canidate. A PoC/woman splits off as an independant, but has a much less chance of winning. Who do you vote for? Are we going to bernie or bust ourselves again?
So when Republicans win, it's the natural order of things. They know how to appeal to ~~~real Americans~~~. They never need last-minute assists from FBI directors or collaborations with hostile foreign powers.
When Democrats win, they had to have help from some external event or source. It can't be that they ran good, inspiring, issue-focused campaigns.
and Georgia? A black female candidate might win despite everything stacked against her including extreme voter suppression?