It will be Trish for maximum ick. This affront to nature is what triggers Vergil's return.
That's not how licenses work. You don't get to choose who you can use.
Because the game was contracted and entered development while Marvel still had the mutant media ban in place.Why didn't they negotiate the rights to use at least Wolv/Mags/Storm/Sent like Seth Killian did with MVC3, before they signed the contract?
They shouldn't have accepted that contract. They would have been better off not making that game.Bruh, this is the Capcom that accepted a MvC game contract without X-men.
Because the game was contracted and entered development while Marvel still had the mutant media ban in place.
They shouldn't have accepted that contract. They would have been better off not making that game.
Do you not understand what a ban is? Marvel stopped producing mutant material outside of comics and I think toys for a couple of years, on purpose. There is no negotiation to be had. The game never should have been greenlit in the first place due to that.Negotiate then. Make a case for it. 4-5 X-men wouldn't mean much to Marvel/Fox, but it would go so far to please fans.
Like I said, they should've negotiated and reasoned with them before signing the contract.
Disney/Marvel sabotaged the X-Men comics to hurt the X-Men's movie franchise popularity when they were Fox's, I assure you that they don't give a rat's ass about the fans.Negotiate then. Make a case for it. 4-5 X-men wouldn't mean much to Marvel/Fox, but it would go so far to please fans.
She will have pink hair and be spunky, as for which of the women who is her mother, it's a secretLucia is best girl and has the dopest devil trigger design in the series what's up
Do you not understand what a ban is? Marvel stopped producing mutant material outside of comics and I think toys for a couple of years, on purpose. There is no negotiation to be had. The game never should have been greenlit in the first place due to that.
It' weird how almost every new announcement got either leaked by wallmart or by some early promotion reveal by the publisher by accident, yet nothing about DMC5 and REmake 2 is around the web.
Disney/Marvel sabotaged the X-Men comics to hurt the X-Men's movie franchise popularity when they were Fox's, I assure you that they don't give a rat's ass about the fans.
You are being extremely dense. No, not everything is a matter of negotiation; especially under Ike Perlmutter's reign. I think the word "ban" is elusive to you.E V E R Y T H I N G I S N E G O T I A B LE
What a shit deal in the end. No promotion, supposedly mobile art imposed on devs, short dev time, and on top of that they can't even bend a bit on their policies on a couple of characters that would please the entirety of the FGC?
What a load of rubbish. This is why I don't have faith in DMCV made by a Capcom that accepted such a contract (among other things).
E V E R Y T H I N G I S N E G O T I A B LE
What a shit deal in the end. No promotion, supposedly mobile art imposed on devs, short dev time, and on top of that they can't even bend a bit on their policies on a couple of characters that would please the entirety of the FGC?
What a load of rubbish. This is why I don't have faith in DMCV made by a Capcom that accepted such a contract (among other things).
Better yet, it'sYou see Dante's daughter at the beginning of the game, she will be a big part of the story and at the end you find out she's also Bayonetta's daughter too.
I like how everyone always goes to Dante having a daughter and not a son. Dante is doomed to forever being surrounded by women putting him in his place.
You are being extremely dense. No, not everything is a matter of negotiation; especially under Ike Perlmutter's reign. I think the word "ban" is elusive to you.
Furthermore, Marvel Infinite's production is not indicitive of anything outside the reach of Capcom's fighting game division (which Devil May Cry isn't being developed by). Were Resident Evil 7 and Monster Hunter World not critically acclaimed?
You can't disagree with what reality is. Mutants were BANNED from being promoted in any non-comic context. This game entered production when the ban was in place. That's the end of it.I disagree on your first point, and regarding the second, sure if DMCV is a quality title, they can still make a boneheaded move and make it exclusive to MS/Windows, alienating their bigger fanbase.
Did someone tweet it to him? Lol
Seriously though, two twin girls that grow up to star the series in like the 7th or the 8th installment? I'd be interested in that.
You can't disagree with what reality is. Mutants were BANNED from being promoted in any non-comic context. This game entered production when the ban was in place. That's the end of it.
I thought Nero had it so it makes sense he adjusted his style until he gets it back
Yamato's kinda gone, if this is set after DMC4 it makes sense Vergil wouldn't start with it. He could always get a new katana eventually, but Yamato is part of Nero now.
E V E R Y T H I N G I S N E G O T I A B LE
What a shit deal in the end. No promotion, supposedly mobile art imposed on devs, short dev time, and on top of that they can't even bend a bit on their policies on a couple of characters that would please the entirety of the FGC?
What a load of rubbish. This is why I don't have faith in DMCV made by a Capcom that accepted such a contract (among other things).
I did, don't normally tweet.
Marvel was ironclad on their X-Man ban. It was some one off thing, it applied to literally everything. Absolutely no Marvel video game made in that time period could have ever had X-Men characters, no matter what. It was not something up for debate. If a developer refused to make a game without them, Marvel wasn't going to let them make it at all. End of story.
Uh, Marvel Heroes has practically every mutant you would want to play already in game. One just got a model update, and they just poured the most resources ever into Deadpools rework in time for his movie that, you guessed it, MARVEL doesnt own. Thats a pretty big hole in your argument.
Also, currently on Marvels UNLIMITED service, Deadpool is the featured character and they've assembled many of his stories. He's a fox character.
Marvel Heroes halved the amount of characters to be released this year because people were complaining that they wanted more work put into the heroes before release. So they're doing that. But that limits who they can make. So they've focused on some highly requested characters and a few that Marvel likely asked them to create / they have a tip from Marvel that the character is going to be hot (ie. Ultron).
As for Beast, I suspect we will see his release randomly. Cheap hero to make. Angel just isnt as important. Yes people want him, but compared to Green Goblin or Fury he received very little hype.
They had 7 heroes to release. There are 19 playable x-men (20 if you include Deadpool, and 24 if you include all Fox owned characters) thats 1/3 of the roster with zero playable Inhumans. I think they had some other priorities if they were going to release 7 heroes in a year.
I think Ban is a strong word. They are obviously going to make a marketing push for characters they own in their most popular mediums. So the movie characters out now, and coming out in the next 5 years are front and center. The comics feature all of these supposedly banned heroes fairly predominantly.
I think this idea that they've banned the use of fox owned characters is an over exaggeration of a basic marketing strategy that every single character driven product has been doing since it was marketable, including DC and Marvel for as long as they've been around.
Where were all the Moon Knight games? Why arent there any Dare Devil games out there? Why arent there any Inhumans playable in Marvel heroes, or many other marvel games for the matter? Why Have only Batman and Superman gotten essentially any media what so ever from DC? No games for nearly any other DC hero.
Also, Lego Marvel Avengers is focused on the movies and the movies heroes. To feature x-men would be brand confusion. Also, notice there are no Inhumans in the game... zero. In fact, there are very few heroes outside of the Avengers and their related characters in the game.
So yeah, you guys are over blowing a pretty basic thing thats been going on looooong before the movie rights disputes. Hell, you point out in every part of your list here that the twins, who are OWNED BY MARVEL and predominant characters for Marvel right now, arent in any of these games either.
Why do you insist on being pigheaded while talking about things you know nothing about? Capcom goes to Marvel to buy a license in order to develop content featuring Marvel characters in their games. Marvel does not go to Capcom for anything. Marvel has dictated what characters are and are not allowed to be put in rosters since their collaboration began. Marvel dictates what characters and storylines are and are not allowed to be put in every single game featuring their characters regardless of who's developing it. There are stipulations to licensing. If Marvel does not want something to be done, then it will not be done. Otherwise, that is a breach of contract.The company that made the ban are the same company that went to Capcom to make a Versus title featuring their IP, no?
They're talking directly to the source, there is always flexibility.
Why do you insist on being pigheaded while talking about things you know nothing about? Capcom goes to Marvel to buy a license in order to develop content featuring Marvel characters in their games. Marvel does not go to Capcom for anything. Marvel has dictated what characters are and are not allowed to be put in rosters since their collaboration began. Marvel dictates what characters and storylines are and are not allowed to be put in every single game featuring their characters regardless of who's developing it. There are stipulations to licensing. If Marvel does not want something to be done, then it will not be done. Otherwise, that is a breach of contract.
That's how business works.
Because Marvel was pushing their movies?Why didn't they negotiate the rights to use at least Wolv/Mags/Storm/Sent like Seth Killian did with MVC3, before they signed the contract?
Exactly what I was thinking...We are less than a week away from a possible DMCV reveal and we are talking about Dante's daughter and the X-men marvel ban.... Da fuck?
PC version goes even beyond 60FPS (and is where I preordered DmC back then, btw).
That's why I've said a katana instead of Yamato. I'm really hoping he gets something new because I really liked his moves in DMC3 and 4.
It looked like shit in every single one of its showings. Main character design was bad, which is shocking for Platinum. Dragon designs were equally boring. Also shocking for Platinum. And now I don't have to buy an Xbox. I guess morale was probably bad for Platinum after the cancellation, but now it seems like they're able to focus on more interesting concepts and apparently 2 new IPs.
Dude, I kept thinking that you were racking up leaks, not some prediction/wish-list lol.-"Stylish" cellshaded graphics. (Okami + DMC4)
-"Divisive" Vergil looks. (Think of a Younger looking Geralt from Witcher)
-Locked 60fps.
-One of the 3 main playable characters is sporting a notable Beard.
-Lots of weapons.
-Kamiya involved.
-Not called DMC5 for a reason, involves different timelines during story.
-Downloadable demo pushed to tgs.
-Releases march 2019.
-Microsoft conference.
That would be quite a nice/weird turn of events for DMCV, wouldnt it?
One of the greatest trailers of all time. I don't know if anything will ever top it, but I don't think I've ever been more hyped for a game announcement than this. I can't be held responsible for my actions when I see my boy Vergil's new look.