They were always gonna have to align themselves to one of the big three (US,EU, China). Brexit is a story of a country that vastly overestimates its power.So they are gaining "independence" from Brussels to immediately sell it to Bejing?
They were always gonna have to align themselves to one of the big three (US,EU, China). Brexit is a story of a country that vastly overestimates its power.So they are gaining "independence" from Brussels to immediately sell it to Bejing?
That's long gone, there aren't even that many big British owned companies anymore.This is hilarious.
Now to strip the UK of all its ill gotten wealth...
It's also a way for China to spread its ideology and values into the world.The Belt and Road program isn't something any European countries should be signing up to. It's just way for China to force foreign nations into debt so they can plunder any natural resource they want.
The crown, the towns, the lands, all of it.That's long gone, there aren't even that many big British owned companies anymore.
That was an EU US deal anyway so....So....are all youGafEra-ers still happy that the TPP was torn up?
as an ethnic chinese in singapore (herself an ex-british colony) and well-versed in the history of the opium wars, these replies made me laugh....
so the current timeline is akin to star wars episode 3: revenge of the sith? XD
more like return of the kingso the current timeline is akin to star wars episode 3: revenge of the sith? XD
China can't force nations to take credits. For Germany is the belt already profitable with Duisburg and Hamburg being the end of the China-Europe road.The Belt and Road program isn't something any European countries should be signing up to. It's just way for China to force foreign nations into debt so they can plunder any natural resource they want.
With all of our decisions it feels like I'm experiencing "Twitch Chat Plays the British Government."
Ah, yes.
This is so good.With all of our decisions it feels like I'm experiencing "Twitch Chat Plays the British Government."
The Five Eyes are Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US. This is to add to the above post.Five Eyes is a security exchange network of 5 countries that together lowered the barriers between each other for information sharing. That is, the five participants involved agreed to share information more freely with each other than they do with outside nations.
China is not a participant. And so when the UK allows Huawei increased access, the other Four Eyes will probably be a little more hesitant to freely share with the UK.
But Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Singapore? And no EU countries.
The point is about the hyperbolic Brexit title though. If UK is weaker for leaving the EU then why is Italy while remaining in the EU.Ah, yes.
That bastion of stability and prosperity that is Italy. That the UK is mentioned next to Italy isn't a good look. While I agree that it is an exaggeration, Italy doesn't strengthen your point.
Separate deal and one that was already made. He said TPP but meant TTIP, Transatlantic Trade and Investment PartnershipBut Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Singapore? And no EU countries.
They're two different countries. With different statures.The point is about the hyperbolic Brexit title though. If UK is weaker for leaving the EU then why is Italy while remaining in the EU.
And it's a bogus argument because it's not backed up by anything in the article outside of a "maybe" because of Brexit.They're two different countries. With different statures.
If Brexit is making the UK as disfuncional as Italy, that is a cause for concern. The argument is that if stayed in the EU, it wouldn't be mentioned in the same sentence as Italy.
That's not what I'm arguing. The point I'm making is that using Italy as a point of comparison doesn't help strengthen your argument.And it's a bogus argument because it's not backed up by anything in the article outside of a "maybe" because of Brexit.
TPP was a stupid package, because Obama let neoliberals sneak too many multinational corporation stuff in it. Also it has absolutely nothing to do with UK's geopolitic direction in the 21st century. UK was one of the first to dump Obama and sign up on AIIB.So....are all youGafEra-ers still happy that the TPP was torn up?
Yeah well that's what I was arguing about and if you can't see how Italy, member of EU, doesn't support that then we're done here.That's not what I'm arguing. The point I'm making is that using Italy as a point of comparison doesn't help strengthen your argument.
Are you sure that’s what they meant? The TTP was designed to weaken China’s influence which is what they were seemingly referring to.Separate deal and one that was already made. He said TPP but meant TTIP, Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Yes. 200%. Don't believe me check yourself, it's called the Trans Pacific Partnership. Also we don't and can't legally negotiate as a member of the single market which we are and were for the entire negotiation period plus the USA never ever proposed it because it was pre brexit.Are you sure that’s what they meant? The TTP was designed to weaken China’s influence which is what they were seemingly referring to.
The AIIB is virtually meaningless to Britain and, frankly, most of Asia. It's a potemkin bank - a facade for unregulated Chinese SOE investment in Belt and Road projects. Outside of stronger bilateral trade relationships with China, Britain would almost certainly benefit more from the CPTPP - but it's really not clear how anybody else benefits from Britain's involvement.TPP was a stupid package, because Obama let neoliberals sneak too many multinational corporation stuff in it. Also it has absolutely nothing to do with UK's geopolitic direction in the 21st century. UK was one of the first to dump Obama and sign up on AIIB.
Prestige. The Great Britain brand name still turn heads in a lot of former colonies. Think of UK as the "Leica" of the western world.The AIIB is virtually meaningless to Britain and, frankly, most of Asia. It's a potemkin bank - a facade for unregulated Chinese SOE investment in Belt and Road projects. Outside of stronger bilateral trade relationships with China, Britain would almost certainly benefit more from the CPTPP - but it's really not clear how anybody else benefits from Britain's involvement.
It's likely to be less about Britain's prestige and more about balancing against US bilateralism.Prestige. The Great Britain brand name still turn heads in a lot of former colonies. Think of UK as the "Leica" of the western world.
You already know this, but I'm going to spell it out for you anyways: Italy is one of the most politically unstable members of the EU.Yeah well that's what I was arguing about and if you can't see how Italy, member of EU, doesn't support that then we're done here.
To be fair britains politcial scene is basically Italy or worse at this point.You already know this, but I'm going to spell it out for you anyways: Italy is one of the most politically unstable members of the EU.
Lord buckethead isnt a serious candidate for prime minister yet..To be fair britains politcial scene is basically Italy or worse at this point.
It's also a way for China to spread its ideology and values into the world.
Authoritarianism, oppression of the individual, nationalism and a strong aversion to democracy, diversity, freedom, human rights and western values in general.
And honestly, I believe these same values are getting more and more popular in the West, too. Trump and Brexit clearly show that.
I really dont think western populations are going back to a system that oppresses the individual at every turn.The united states could only do it for so long. China is our next super power. Fueled by cheap goods we all bought.
Insane but only outcome here. Capitalism doesnt care who is in charge.
I really dont think western populations are going back to a system that oppresses the individual at every turn.
I also dont think that future challenges like climate change or the advent of AI can be handled by authoritarian regimes.
And lastly I do not believe that authoritarian regimes can peacefully coexist, which becomes an ever increasing problem as our destructive abilities grow and conflicts grow to one mass extinction event after the other.
I really don't think that humanity can enjoy a positive and sustainable future unless liberal, western, rational ideology becomes the dominant ideology around the globe.
"Would you be interested in a (bad) trade agreement with England?"