I'm developing the habit of checking a channels other videos to see where they stand on other issues before I watch a video of some seemingly outrageous subject. Then I dislike the video and tell YT that I'm not interested in the hope that the bad videos don't get recommended to me.Thanks for the clarification, I've been weary of the kind of stuff that YT has been suggesting to me, especially after checking some stuff suggested here.
It's a weird, but understandable tendency - many of the folks making these videos end up responding to folks I wouldn't have ever heard about if it were for them, and I guess the way they tag their videos signals YT to suggest the "originals" to me.
I watched this video yesterday about cyberfascism and how the Internet is making us a bit more fascistic. One of the solutions the guy puts forward is that we should be able to select what algorithm recommends videos to us. For instance, if you want, you could select an algorithm that would recommend you videos that would go against your views if you want or an algorithm that provides a mixed view.
CGP Grey makes a good case for the problems with this "response culture", on how conflicts cooperate more than drive the conflicting parts away from each other:
It doesn't help some folks present in a pretty obnoxious way, which helps promote their personal brand both through the people that agree with them and with those that most certainly don't and whom they antagonize - that might end up as a net negative, I'm afraid...
I think this video shows how the marketplace of ideas is bullshit. Truth doesn't get spread no where near as fast or as wide as things that makes us outraged. Ideas aren't won in validity.