I would say "you'd be surprised how many of these chuds are pedos, though" but considering how many contacts for Trump that Epstein had in his address book, maybe it's not that surprising after all
True, but that's a little irrelevant to my point. Milo wasn't, for example, kicked off The_Donald for disagreeing with someone. He was abandoned by the alt-right, because strategically, they know a guy who is known to be pro-pedo won't be useful for spreading their ideas to centrists and "normies."I would say "you'd be surprised how many of these chuds are pedos, though" but considering how many contacts for Trump that Epstein had in his address book, maybe it's not that surprising after all
If you disagree with the hatred, you disagree with the central premise of the movement and aren't politically useful so getting banned is expected.Actually that's not true. Right-wing subs on Reddit ban you at the drop of the hat if you should dare to disagree with the hatred.
The same goes for Milo and other tokens. They are only tolerated as long as they support the hate. When they dare to disagree they get dropped without a second thought. Usually violently so.
That happened to quite a few people from the not your shield campaign during Gamergate for example.
There is a reason for the onion structure mentioned in the video.
If milo was straight he might have gotten away with it.I would say "you'd be surprised how many of these chuds are pedos, though" but considering how many contacts for Trump that Epstein had in his address book, maybe it's not that surprising after all
To think how many people do not have the resources and know-how to fight these spurious claims. Fuck capitalism.Would be nice if YouTube was actually held accountable for their awful system/policies for once.
For sure. I'll be honest, I don't even understand what is going on, precisely.To think how many people do not have the resources and know-how to fight these spurious claims. Fuck capitalism.
Yeah, it's awful.To think how many people do not have the resources and know-how to fight these spurious claims. Fuck capitalism.
To summarize to the best of my understanding, UMG made a copyright claim on her video and put ads on it and because it's a sponsored video part of her contract with Audible stipulates that ads cannot be run on it which technically puts her in violation of that contract. Someone brought up that YouTube could be considered the party in violation (since they're responsible for it happening, it being their platform,) and YouTube responded with a whole lot of nothing, just clarifying that the claim is "valid" insofar that UMG owns the copyright and it's now up to them to decide whether to accept the appeal. So, Lindsay now seems intent on taking it directly to YouTube. Not knowledgeable about how much of a case she actually has here, so dunno how it'll develop.For sure. I'll be honest, I don't even understand what is going on, precisely.
I hope all the best for Lindsay.
Oh wow, thank you. Okay, so I definitely didn't know that UMG could just go in and put ads on her video. That seems really wrong to me. I want to say again: Good luck to Lindsay! I hope she wins this (however that might come about).To summarize to the best of my understanding, UMG made a copyright claim on her video and put ads on it and because it's a sponsored video part of her contract with Audible stipulates that ads cannot be run on it which technically puts her in violation of that contract. Someone brought up that YouTube could be considered the party in violation (since they're responsible for it happening, it being their platform,) and YouTube responded with a whole lot of nothing, just clarifying that the claim is "valid" insofar that UMG owns the copyright and it's now up to them to decide whether to accept the appeal. So, Lindsay now seems intent on taking it directly to YouTube. Not knowledgeable about how much of a case she actually has here, so dunno how it'll develop.
To think how many people do not have the resources and know-how to fight these spurious claims. Fuck capitalism.
Isn't the issue also that often times copyright holders don't actually respect fair use? If a copyright holder decides to uphold a claim you're out of luck unless you're willing/able to lawyer up. At least, that was my impression, I'm no youtuber.To be fair, when your content is clearly fair use, fighting the claims through the YT automated system is often really simple (but still frustrating).
You do the appeal, then (a decent amount of the time you have to follow up with a) counter-appeal, and then in case of a strike (the copyright "owner" going that far is rare) you appeal the strike.
The complication for this case is Lindsay's video apparently needing to be ad-free as per agreement with her sponsor (weird as fuck agreement to put in a contract for anyone who's familiar with YT, I have to say), and the copyright claimant forcing ads rather than disabling them.
Isn't the issue also that often times copyright holders don't actually respect fair use? If a copyright holder decides to uphold a claim you're out of luck unless you're willing/able to lawyer up. At least, that was my impression, I'm no youtuber.
Interesting. Thanks for the clarification.They (technically) have to lawyer up first and actually send you legal docs if you dispute/appeal them all the way to the final step.
I am a YouTuber (god, I hate saying that), and have gotten to that final phase before in a dispute (no court action was taken, and I don't even know of a single case where a large company actually followed through on that).
From YouTube Help:
"After we process your counter notification by forwarding it to the claimant, the claimant has 10 business days to give us evidence that they've initiated a court action to keep the content down. This time period is a requirement of copyright law, so please be patient.
If your account has been suspended for multiple copyright violations, the counter notification webform will be inaccessible. If appropriate, you may submit a free-form counter notification."
As a European with a white collar job, many things talked about here are alien to me. Like it comes from a dystopian alternate reality.
Don't get me wrong, my job isn't paradise but still...
American work culture is beyond fucked up.
I work in a fairly large company.Yeah, same here. Although, I don't know about you, but I work in a startup company, so I have to imagine that, even in the US, things are pretty different from what is talked about in the video if you happen to be working in a tiny company. Imagine unionizing in a 3-man company lol. This seems to apply mostly to mid-sized and large companies.
Speaking as a smaller channel...yeah it's disgraceful how much abuse of copyright law has screwed over people without the same connections or ability to raise a stink and get a clear case of ignoring fair use as a defense for transformative media; i've had at least two videos of mine struck into the void, one being blocked globally (it was on the history of Canadian music, thanks Warner Music you ghouls), the outright removed/voluntarily taken down because the copyright holder was going to leave a strike on my channel if I didn't (thanks ShoPro).To think how many people do not have the resources and know-how to fight these spurious claims. Fuck capitalism.
They're a great great essayist. Dedicated and always does his research.
Destiny got completely exposed by Ben Burgis. Dude descends to Shapiro levels of nonsense when going up against anyone who isn't a mouth breathing reactionary.
What is his argument against Hasan? I've seen his prior attempts to dig up dirt on him and found them wanting.
What is his argument against Hasan? I've seen his prior attempts to dig up dirt on him and found them wanting.
Well, then the exposition chain goes infinite cause he exposed the shallowness of Peter Coffin and Hasan too. AT LEAST. At the very least. (And in the debate with Michael Albert, they get into a quite productive discussion about post-capitalist societies, compared to other debates). My point is that these leftist celebrities can and often be lazy when it comes to their approach to opposing political ideologies.
If a leftist cannot hold their own against a liberal, then there is some heavy intellectual work to do, because that debate and that fight is winnable.
Coffin was just too nice and wanted to avoid any confrontation with Destiny. I'm not a massive fan of Coffin in any case.
The guy who really embarrassed himself was Douglas Lane. Dude sounded like a moron and should probably stick to scripted videos.