i'd pay no more than $400 for something like this
rich people need to share the damn wealth
Yep. As I predicted early in this thread, it's highly doubtful that a single individual would spend this much on a painting. Thought for sure it would be a family/person with unlimited money like Arab royalty and sure enough...
I have sealed record albums and sports cards that came out in the last 10 years that are worth $400+.
I think you may be underestimating the value of historical pieces, LOL.
..and I'm no "rich" guy money wise.
I travelled over 850 miles by car and bus to see one of his paintings at the Art Institute of Chicago. :)
Ok, there was more to the trip than that, but it WAS one of the major highlights.
For the uninitiated (some tasteful nudity ahead): https://artrenewal.org/Artist/Index/7
I'm lucky to have one of his most amazing piece in quai d'orsai in Paris. It's a huge painting, really impressive.
Yeah i was talking about Les Oréades which is 2,3 meters tall it seems. That's something to see in person!
i'd pay no more than $400 for something like this
rich people need to share the damn wealth
He is a little-known Saudi prince from a remote branch of the royal family, with no history as a major art collector, and no publicly known source of great wealth.
....
The painting's previous owner, Dmitry E. Rybolovlev, is a Russian billionaire who bought a $95 million Florida home from Donald J. Trump nearly a decade ago. Mr. Rybolovlev had paid $127.5 million for the painting in 2013 — less than a third of its sale price last month — and he is still locked in litigation with the dealer who sold it to him over that lofty price, among other transactions.
It's not terribly outrageous to suspect something a touch fishy.
The painting's previous owner, Dmitry E. Rybolovlev, is a Russian billionaire who bought a $95 million Florida home from Donald J. Trump
And even before the disclosure of the record-breaking purchase in a New York art auction by one of his associates, Prince Mohammed's extravagance had already raised eyebrows, most notably with the impulse purchase two years ago in the south of France of a Russian vodka titan's 440-foot yacht, for half a billion dollars.
As it happens, Prince Bader is a friend and associate of the leader of the purge: the country's 32-year-old crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman.
Sistine chapel ceiling how muchMakes you wonder of the valuation of the Mona Lisa, The Last Supper and The Vitruvian Man if they went up for auction. We'd be talking about upwards of a billion right?
Makes you wonder of the valuation of the Mona Lisa, The Last Supper and The Vitruvian Man if they went up for auction. We'd be talking about upwards of a billion right?
Yep, possibly a billion in an auction.Guinness World Records lists the Mona Lisa as having the highest insurance value for a painting in history. On permanent display at The Louvre museum in Paris, the Mona Lisa was assessed at US$100 million on December 14, 1962. Taking inflation into account, the 1962 value would be around US$790 million in 2016.
Cool you see no value in historic relics/art. Can't say I agree with you.
Cool you see no value in historic relics/art. Can't say I agree with you.
You had your chance:i'd pay no more than $400 for something like this
rich people need to share the damn wealth
Sort of disingenuous to say that these paintings are being valued as historied artefacts of humanity, they're not. They're just investments for rich people.
Are you implying they are not one in the same?
In all seriousness, art prices seem to be going through the roof in recent time. Is there any speculation on why this is the case?
I love that place so much. Nearly spent the entire day there with my ex once and still weren't able to see everything that was showcased there!I travelled over 850 miles by car and bus to see one of his paintings at the Art Institute of Chicago. :)
Why would they? This is speculation until we know for sure. Also, its part of one of many assets to be housed in Abu Dhabi new museum, its available for the public tl enjoy, which should be encouraged.Mohammed bin Salman is the real buyer, I'm surprised that people aren't making a big deal out of this.
I don't think that hanging a $450 million painting on museum in Abu Dhabi museum is going to feed the orphaned hungry kids and homeless Yemenis thanks to his bombings. And aside from being a major waste of money, it's super hypocritical coming from a guy who claims to be going after corrupt Saudi princes.Why would they? This is speculation until we know for sure. Also, its part of one of many assets to be housed in Abu Dhabi new museum, its available for the public tl enjoy, which should be encouraged.