The popularity of the expanded universe suggests otherwise for the diehards. Casual fans certainly wanted something new.Most Star Wars fans don't want new, they want stuff like rogue one and baby Yoda, so no people would hate on him anyway.
The popularity of the expanded universe suggests otherwise for the diehards. Casual fans certainly wanted something new.Most Star Wars fans don't want new, they want stuff like rogue one and baby Yoda, so no people would hate on him anyway.
The prequels had plenty of new but they were hated for years for how bad they were, you can't have your cake and eat it too.The popularity of the expanded universe suggests otherwise for the diehards. Casual fans certainly wanted something new.
Aside from midichlorians and Jar Jar most enthusiasts were disappointed in how Lucas handled his material compared to past efforts or the clone wars team.The prequels had plenty of new but they were hated for years for how bad they were, you can't have your cake and eat it too.
Because he had to pass the torch, I would compare it to Ridley Scott; I like the guy but he wouldn't make half of the film that Blade Runner 2049 is.Aside from midichlorians and Jar Jar most enthusiasts were disappointed in how Lucas handled his material compared to past efforts or the clone wars team.
I am a fan of the prequels; they are, as they always have been, fantastic movies. I would rank the original trilogy higher, but they are great and I have always disagreed with most of the hate that trilogy gets. So, yes, if George Lucas had made the ST, I'm sure I'd like it a whole lot more than the mediocre mess Disney gave us! The ST started off badly with maybe the worst Star Wars movie ever, and didn't get much better as it went along, partially because of the obvious lack of planning, the mood whiplash between films (thanks to Rian having a totally different vision from JJ), the way that so much of what they are is a mediocre rehash of Lucas's far better original trilogy, and more.
(Rogue One is easily my favorite of Disney Star Wars movies. It's a solid old EU book-turned-film story and I enjoyed it. Solo was alright as well, I liked it well enough.)
However, that's just me, and had Lucas made more Star Wars movies, I'm sure I would have been in the minority again, and as with the prequels or the ST as it exists, people would have found many reasons to criticize the movies. The blowback against the PT was strong, after all. With George getting a bit older now, why deal with that again? Why not just take the billions of dollars and let Star Wars, and the fans' hatred for anything new in the franchise, be somebody elses' problem now? From that persective I can easily understand why he sold Star Wars. It's unfortunate, as Disney (with JJ and Rian's "help") has mostly ruined something that used to be one of my favorite media franchises -- I still have several boxes of old EU books in my basement and read almost all of them up to the end of the NJO, and a bit beyond -- but... seriously, would YOU want to deal with this fanbase again if you were George Lucas? Or would you rather just have $4 billion and let the fans hate someone else now?
As for what a Lucas trilogy would have looked like, from what we have seen some of the basic plot elements would have been the same -- a female lead, a male lead who was good but turns to the dark side, etc. Those elements could have been done well and I definitely like the idea of having a female lead in major Star Wars movies. The concept is clearly Lucas's, as you see previously in the later parts of the old EU; Rey and Ben/Kylo were clearly partially inspired by Jaina and Jacen. There are plenty more elemnts of the original Lucas concept that were used. What he never would have done, however, is put that core plot in a "remake of the original trilogy" framework because, for good or ill (depending on who you ask), he wanted to do new things and not just rehash old ones. The fans thought they wanted a rehash of the old stuff, but it's nice to see more people, by the end of this trilogy. realize that maybe it wasn't such a great idea. And giving Star Wars to JJ Abrams, the guy who ruined Star Trek, was an even worse idea... but anyway, I get why Lucas wouldn't want to deal with all of this anymore. Oh well.
(To give JJ a little credit I do think RoS is better than the other two ST films, but it still has plenty of problems so that is not high praise.)
Eh they were hated by the casuals way after the fact. They weren't hated at the time by casuals all scored at least A- cinema score. TRoS was actually hated more at the time scoring a B+.The prequels had plenty of new but they were hated for years for how bad they were, you can't have your cake and eat it too.
Nah show some facts rather going based off of feelings, the only measured response we have from the time was Cinema score which definitely doesn't suggest that.General audiences definitely disliked the first two prequels when they were released.
I understand if you're not comfortable saying your age but I'm wondering how old were you when the prequels released? Because it was pretty obvious at the time what public reception was and people took Star Wars just as seriously then as they do now. Opinions on the prequels have only become more positive since.Nah show some facts rather going based off of feelings, the only measured response we have from the time was Cinema score which definitely doesn't suggest that.
This is what I mean by feelings, not using anything objective here. By this measure people hated Avatar, it had good legs good word of mouth and was scored well by audiences. Whatever response you see will never be the big picture which is why things are empirically measured.I understand if you're not comfortable saying your age but I'm wondering how old were you when the prequels released? Because it was pretty obvious at the time what public reception was and people took Star Wars just as seriously then as they do now.
The Clone Wars cartoon says "Hi."
George decided it was time to let go, but he sold the company to Disney for much less than it was worth because he felt it was going to a good home, and he gave Disney a three-movie outline which they could use for the Sequel Trilogy, and Disney told George that they were going to respect him and consult with him for his vision...He couldn't have done worse than the fucking mess we got, and it sure as hell would have told a story with three coherent acts...
But meh I'm over it......and so I think was George when he sold it to Disney.
George decided it was time to let go, but he sold the company to Disney for much less than it was worth because he felt it was going to a good home, and he gave Disney a three-movie outline which they could use for the Sequel Trilogy, and Disney told George that they were going to respect him and consult with him for his vision...
... and then during his first meeting he saw that they had thrown away his outline and were making The Force Awakens. George felt betrayed (according to Disney's CEO, no less) and George told an interviewer that it felt like he had sold his children to White Slavers.
So he's kinda over it, but kinda not really.