Oct 27, 2017
6,914
G_SYNC_OLED_Line_up.0.jpg



Here's the full lineup of LG's 2020 OLEDs. As always, the company is releasing a lineup of NanoCell LCD TVs as well.

RX Signature series (rollable TV)
  • 65-inch
ZX Signature series (8K OLED)
  • 88-inch
  • 77-inch
WX Signature series ("wallpaper" OLED TV)
  • 65-inch
GX Signature series (new Gallery series)
  • 77-inch
  • 65-inch
  • 55-inch
CX series
  • 77-inch
  • 65-inch
  • 55-inch
  • 48-inch
BX series
  • 65-inch
  • 55-inch
For those not interested in LG's luxury series, there are also excellent updates to the regular OLED lineup, and LG is introducing an entirely new size for 2020: a 48-inch 4K OLED TV. At that size, you're getting pixel density "comparable to that of a 96-inch 8K TV," the company says. Consumers are buying giant TVs in droves, but it's nice to see LG recognizing that some people need something a bit smaller — and now they don't have to miss out on OLED as a result. LG views the 48-incher as a perfect bridge between gaming monitor and living room TV, and it retains LG's low input lag (around 13ms) and support for variable refresh rate via either Nvidia's G-Sync or AMD's FreeSync.
 

Navid

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,071
That CX 48" might be a good fit for my next gen upgrade depending on price...
 

ev0

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,446
been waiting for a 48 inch oled for ages. Its the biggest size that will fit in my bedroom setup lol
 

btags

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,119
Gaithersburg MD
I find the line about the 48 inch screen having comparable pixel density to a 96 inch 8k screen weird. Might as well write that it has comparable pixel density to a 24 inch 1080p display, or a 12 inch 540p display.
 

Jeffram

Member
Oct 29, 2017
3,992
Not too much difference from last year's models at first glance. I might pick up a C9 for cheap once these hit shelves.
 

xtib81

Member
Mar 10, 2019
1,890
Can't wait to see the first reviews of the C10. I'll get either the C9 or the C10 depending on the differences.
 

scitek

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,274
So I assume these should push the price of the C9s down. Is it worth getting one of these over the C9 due to newer things like HDMI 2.1, or are they pretty much at feature-parity?
 

Planet

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,358
BTW: the 2019 models support GSync as well.
Thread name also need "Freesync" in it.
Why? That would be wrong, LG doesn't support Freesync over HDMI. While HDMI 2.1 VRR s closely related, it's not quite the same. PC graphics cards need to adopt the standard (and the next gen consoles will have it, of course).
 

Loanshark

Member
Nov 8, 2017
1,637
So their answer to Samsungs Frame models is going to be an oled huh? Wonder how they solved the burn-in problems for that.
 

nStruct

The Fallen
Oct 26, 2017
3,189
Seattle, WA
So I assume these should push the price of the C9s down. Is it worth getting one of these over the C9 due to newer things like HDMI 2.1, or are they pretty much at feature-parity?

C9 already has HDMI 2.1. There will likely be incremental upgrades, such as it looks like these can do 4K 120Hz where as the C9 can only do 1440p at 120Hz.

EDIT: It appears I'm wrong on the C9's 4K 120Hz support, see replies below!
 
Last edited:

scitek

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,274

DieH@rd

Member
Oct 26, 2017
10,879
BTW: the 2019 models support GSync as well.

Why? That would be wrong, LG doesn't support Freesync over HDMI. While HDMI 2.1 VRR s closely related, it's not quite the same. PC graphics cards need to adopt the standard (and the next gen consoles will have it, of course).

"Furthermore, the company confirmed to FlatpanelsHD that the new TVs will also support AMD FreeSync, in addition to HDMI VRR."
 

1-D_FE

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,355
C9 already has HDMI 2.1. There will likely be incremental upgrades, such as it looks like these can do 4K 120Hz where as the C9 can only do 1440p at 120Hz.

C9 can do 4k @120hz (at least LG claims it can). The problem is, there are no GPUs that have HDMI 2.1. So until we have GPUs/consoles that can output at the full bandwidth, the TV won't display it.