Father of Jacob Wohl, who Wikipedia describes as "an American far-right conspiracy theorist, fraudster, and internet troll".
Nutjob and father of nutjobs.
including the terrorist? Or 2 civilians? RIP. This is A terrible outcome. Fuck the guy. :(
Such a stupid cunt. It is because we don't carry firearms that we don't see mass killings on the scale that happens in the USA.
how Tf you let a terrorist get some kind of monitored release???
Had been a guest at a Cambridge University conference on prisoner rehabilitation... threatened to blow the Hall which was hosting the conference
The Time is a bigoted trash paperNot sure if posting a front page is allowed, please remove if not, but
Did people see the pictures of the guy with what looked like a stick being involved with the pile on? No biggy, just a dude with a 5ft long narwhal horn.
Did people see the pictures of the guy with what looked like a stick being involved with the pile on? No biggy, just a dude with a 5ft long narwhal horn.
It's absolutely terrible what happened, but what bravery. And somehow these new lions of London Bridge end up a story almost as otherworldly as the Fuck you I'm Milwall guy.so the terrorist was apparently released a year ago on license
and apparently one of the people that tackled him was a guy convicted of murder on day release
what a mental story
edit: also there's some footage of the guy being challenged. Someone spraying a fire extinguisher in his face.
Such a stupid cunt. It is because we don't carry firearms that we don't see mass killings on the scale that happens in the USA.
I wonder how we can prevent terrible events like this happening?
Absolutely brave folk to take down the guy like they did, they deserve acclaim and applause for that.
I was a bit puzzled why the police shot the guy when he was restrained at first but the possibility of him having explosives on him makes sense why they had to shoot him. You can't take the chance. Not one.
The judge went on to consider the risk that each defendant posed and the extent to which the public required protection. In respect of the Shahjahan, Khan and Hussain, he concluded that the public could only be protected by the imposition of an indeterminate sentence. Their commitment to long term terrorist aims had been different from the others. They had serious long term plans whereby they intended to send Khan, Hussain and other British recruits for training and terrorist experience. Should they return to the UK they would do so trained and experienced in terrorism. They engaged with the others who were contemplating short term attacks in the UK but rightly considered themselves to be more serious jihadis than the others. He had also taken into consideration the relative youth of Khan. In respect of the others, none had shown any long term or strategic perspective and their risk could be controlled by multi agency involvement from the onerous reporting requirements coupled with stringent licence conditions. He accepted that they had been determined upon a high profile and violent terrorist action but outlined the weakness perceived in each of these defendants.
so the terrorist was apparently released a year ago on license
and apparently one of the people that tackled him was a guy convicted of murder on day release
what a mental story
edit: also there's some footage of the guy being challenged. Someone spraying a fire extinguisher in his face.
Incredible bravery from these three, they absolutely saved some lives. The one with the Whale tusk is Polish as well which will conflict the xenophobes in this country.
Apparently a face was blurred by request of the police in the papers because some of those fighting the terrorist are ex-cons and there was some reintegration/support group nearby.
Second hand information off the internet, but you just know whoever these people are if they have faults or have done problematic things they're best just remaining anonymous and being remembered for bravery/redemption in this one instance.
I don't think the judicial system should be blamed for this. Criminals can reoffend.
Criminals have to be released sometime and the criminal system can put processes in place to monitor someone but you can't guarantee they won't reoffend.
Unless terrorists successfully comply with and complete deradicalisation programmes in prison they shouldn't be getting out
This is what happens when you let religious extremists with violent beliefs back out and they haven't been rehabilitated.
Putting an ankle bracelet on someone only does soo much. As I said above if you outright refuse deradicalisation programmes or you don't complete them to a satisfactory standard, you simply shouldn't be getting out.
Unless terrorists successfully comply with and complete deradicalisation programmes in prison they shouldn't be getting out
This is what happens when you let religious extremists with violent beliefs back out and they haven't been rehabilitated.
Putting an ankle bracelet on someone only does soo much. As I said above if you outright refuse deradicalisation programmes or you don't complete them to a satisfactory standard, you simply shouldn't be getting out.
The biggest issue with this is our criminal system isn't about rehabilitation. Rehabilitation costs money and would require a huge change in what the judicial and criminal system wants to achieve?
Prisons are underfunded and I would guess do not have the resources to implement the kind of rehabilitation system to get the best chance possible of deradicalisation for terrorists or simply rehab for other criminals.
Informative video by sky that compiles clips of how he was taken down