I'd ask for it if I thought it would get me out early.
I don't know if it's been posted already but apparently this guy asked to be deradicilised but got nothing from the probation service.
As part of his release conditions, Khan was obliged to take part in the government's desistance and disengagement programme - the purpose of which is the rehabilitation of people who have been involved in terrorism.
The Parole Board said it had no involvement in the 28-year-old's release, saying he "appears to have been released automatically on licence (as required by law)".
After leaving prison he had moved into a Stafford property on the "approved premises" list.
The attack began at 13:58 GMT on Friday at Fishmongers' Hall, at the north end of London Bridge, at a Cambridge University conference on prisoner rehabilitation.
The Learning Together scheme, which featured in the BBC's Law in Action programme earlier this year, allows university students and prisoners to study alongside each other.
Khan had been one of dozens of people at the event.
Turning to the issue of dangerousness, none of the defendants had resiled from the views expressed in their defence case statements although Chowdhury, Shah Rahman, Khan, Shahjahan and Hussain had written letters of repentance and Desai had shown an interest in attending a de-radicalisation programme while in custody.
Thanks, I thought that even by the probation service's standards, it would be a massive failing if someone wanted a deradicalisation programme and was denied before committing such an awful crime.
He did request deradicalisation In 2016 the requesting letter has been published by itv
Apologies. Here's the link.
So what happens: after a few sessions they pronounce that you are deradicalised? Is that even a word?Thanks, I thought that even by the probation service's standards, it would be a massive failing if someone wanted a deradicalisation programme and was denied before committing such an awful crime.
Sorry I should not have quoted you as I wasn't singling you out.If you're asking me about deradicalisation, you're better off either asking a professional or doing your own research.
If you're asking me about the role of the system, they should be assessing these prisoners before release. If the prisoner themselves asks for a programme and doesn't receive it, what exactly does that say about the people in charge?
?? So our problems can go away with a few therapy sessions! Got it. The whole " He asked for deradicalisation course" sounds like deflection bullshit. Unless people are that stupid that they need someone to tell them that killing is wrong...You do realise you say this when a large proportion of the country have been radicalised, right?
I don't know if it's been posted already but apparently this guy asked to be deradicilised but got nothing from the probation service.
Incredible account of what happened and of the bravery of those men:
Incredible account of what happened and of the bravery of those men:
Incredible account of what happened and of the bravery of those men:
Incredible account of what happened and of the bravery of those men:
Goes with what I posted earlier. That kind of rehab costs money and I just don't see a British goverment prepared to go all in with that.
I'm not sure why people in the thread want to shit on people becoming deradicilised? There has to be a start somewhere and rehabilitation should be the core behind prison sentences.
Terrorist or not eventually they will get released and you either want an angry person coming out or a changed person. I'll go with the changed person.
Stoke-on-Trent?what a loser...
they need to deport these fuckers back to their terrorist land, no second chances
He didn't always think this, something happened, we need to understand why to create/update preventative frameworks from infecting others. We feel it's ok to kill, for instance a man like Usman Khan, terrorist, we (mostly) felt he had to be put down, imagine being so disconnected from reality that a man like him felt the same validation we do internally with those around him, these fanatics often bring up a list of (ridiculous) quasi justifications for thier perspective. It's more complex then saying it's obvious, that only works when we're synchronised to reason with the same set of rules.?? So our problems can go away with a few therapy sessions! Got it. The whole " He asked for deradicalisation course" sounds like deflection bullshit. Unless people are that stupid that they need someone to tell them that killing is wrong...
what a loser...
they need to deport these fuckers back to their terrorist land, no second chances
what a loser...
they need to deport these fuckers back to their terrorist land, no second chances
He was British you racist plonker.what a loser...
they need to deport these fuckers back to their terrorist land, no second chances
Apologies. Here's the link.
Edit* Didn't see that post above!
ITV News understands that Khan was invited to do a "risk assessment and formulation" in 2012, while in Category A HMP Belmarsh - the first step of a deradicalisation programme.
However, it is understood that Khan repeatedly refused the risk assessment test and formulation, a process which would have been taking place before he wrote the letter.
Eventually, in 2014, he seemed to change his mind and went ahead with the risk assessment and formulation and was then on a programme most likely continuously until the end of the custodial part of sentence.
That article says he went through the program, starting in 2014
That went wellwhat a loser...
they need to deport these fuckers back to their terrorist land, no second chances
what a loser...
they need to deport these fuckers back to their terrorist land, no second chances
Hey everyone, sorry for bumping this thread. But I got banned for three months for posting this comment.what a loser...
they need to deport these fuckers back to their terrorist land, no second chances