Kitsune is acting about I expect her to.
So I actually feel better about her right now though. Although I've never seen her as scum
So I actually feel better about her right now though. Although I've never seen her as scum
I always tend to scum read Stu early on, so take it with a grain of salt, but I agree with Vere on that quote that he pointed out, where Stu self consciously tells us he won't vote for a newbie on D1, which is like kind of a common courtesy in this community in my experience so far anyways, so seemed like an odd thing to just randomly say. I also thought his concern about the tic tac toe game seemed pretty forced.
I find it hard to believe you're not trying to make excuses to tunnel right now.
Tunneling you so hard that I'm voting your partners instead.
#masterplan
Which is why I didn't bite when he went fishing. I'm just not shedding tears and concern trolling when he gets called out.Imagine thinking simple votes would somehow change rac's approach lol
Well, you see, in this game everyone is paired off in groups of two. So, although I am voting for one person, it actually counts as voting for two people.
I will loop back around to you later but right now, I'm voting for your scummates Monkey and Stuart.
Why, that was the best
I guess I'm about your Sorian, so this makes sense. Question to B-Dubs isn't pointless, though. Unless I have a good reason to vote someone else this phase, I am happy to lunch Sorian right out of the window. Right now we got a lot of people trying hard (what they're trying varies by person) but there's so many that unless someone really stands out, we honestly might as well get rid of him, unless B-Dubs demonstrates a reason not to.This is all weak. Meme vote for Sorian, asks B-Dubs a pointless question that she doesn't care about, turns around on Kits and pretends to scum hunt for bit, then reiterates that she wants B-Dubs to answer her pointless question.
Vote: Dr. Monkey
he means you're scumYou do know the difference between "Partner" and "Partners", right? Partner implies two people.
I was playing dumb to meet his smug smarmyness with smug smarminess.he means you're scum
scum has multiple partners
hence the plural
their*I was playing dumb to meet his smug smarmyness with smug smarminess.
It did not come off that way even with a generous reading but you do you I guess.I was playing dumb to meet his smug smarmyness with smug smarminess.
Unless I have a good reason to vote someone else this phase, I am happy to lunch Sorian right out of the window.
Every single time you guys lynch me early I flip town and you learn nothing as a result. Why not look for someone actually acting scummy? A Sorian revenge lynch won't tell us anything other than everyone was mad at him for the last game.I guess I'm about your Sorian, so this makes sense. Question to B-Dubs isn't pointless, though. Unless I have a good reason to vote someone else this phase, I am happy to lunch Sorian right out of the window. Right now we got a lot of people trying hard (what they're trying varies by person) but there's so many that unless someone really stands out, we honestly might as well get rid of him, unless B-Dubs demonstrates a reason not to.
So it's not pointless. It's a challenge to Dubs to demonstrate why he (and hence Sorian) should stay in the game.
he means you're scum
scum has multiple partners
hence the plural
Good to know.It did not come off that way even with a generous reading but you do you I guess.
Re: pasta
Penne's pretty good. Linguines and other thick/wide noodles are not for me. I don't actually eat pasta very often.
You can't appeal to past games as a reason to assert innocence in the current game, if the thing you're pointing to in the past games has no bearing on now. (I.E, if it's removed from actions etc.)Every single time you guys lynch me early I flip town and you learn nothing as a result. Why not look for someone actually acting scummy? A Sorian revenge lynch won't tell us anything other than everyone was mad at him for the last game.
So my argument here is you learn absolutely nothing by killing us today and we're better off looking for someone acting scummy.
So you're role fishing B-Dubs?I guess I'm about your Sorian, so this makes sense. Question to B-Dubs isn't pointless, though. Unless I have a good reason to vote someone else this phase, I am happy to lunch Sorian right out of the window. Right now we got a lot of people trying hard (what they're trying varies by person) but there's so many that unless someone really stands out, we honestly might as well get rid of him, unless B-Dubs demonstrates a reason not to.
So it's not pointless. It's a challenge to Dubs to demonstrate why he (and hence Sorian) should stay in the game.
If it's a meme that Sorian very often rolls scum or neutral, then sure, because of the memes. Or because town Sorian is 50/50 on helpfulness and scum/neutral Sorian is slippery and will manage to stay alive much longer than he should - believe me, I know. So if d1 ends up without any good reason to vote someone else, he's as good a reason as any. Only drawback is votes may be harder to read otherwise because Sorian would indeed be an easy vote for scum to pile onto, but it would depend on the teammates.Why? Because of the memes?
This is a really weak excuse to vote Sorian.
(By the way this isn't a pro or anti-lynch BDubs's crew post, I just find that line of argument unconvincing and would like a better one)You can't appeal to past games as a reason to assert innocence in the current game, if the thing you're pointing to in the past games has no bearing on now. (I.E, if it's removed from actions etc.)
Every single time you guys lynch me early I flip town and you learn nothing as a result. Why not look for someone actually acting scummy? A Sorian revenge lynch won't tell us anything other than everyone was mad at him for the last game.
So my argument here is you learn absolutely nothing by killing us today and we're better off looking for someone acting scummy.
And why are votes on Sorian again?You can't appeal to past games as a reason to assert innocence in the current game, if the thing you're pointing to in the past games has no bearing on now. (I.E, if it's removed from actions etc.)
Uh, no?
Let me know when you see someone acting scummy.So my argument here is you learn absolutely nothing by killing us today and we're better off looking for someone acting scummy.
Memes. My vote, however, is based on current conduct.
Yeah, but I'm confused about why he has to appeal innocence D1. Has B-dubs done anything to warrant this Dr. Monkey ?You can't appeal to past games as a reason to assert innocence in the current game, if the thing you're pointing to in the past games has no bearing on now. (I.E, if it's removed from actions etc.)
He hasn't, which is why that should have been his first and foremost defense, and not this wishy washy "I've always been town when you've done this" stuff.Yeah, but I'm confused about why he has to appeal innocence D1. Has B-dubs done anything to warrant this Dr. Monkey ?
I'm sure he'll be playing some Mafia.
In fact, the appeal to past games alone is reason enough to cast an eye of suspicion to B-Dubs when easier lines of defense were readily avaliable.He hasn't, which is why that should have been his first and foremost defense, and not this wishy washy "I've always been town when you've done this" stuff.
Right now, no one, the game is a few hours old at the most. I did think the tic tack toe thing was an odd moment, and I'll be watching those who took part going forward, but it's not enough to vote on yet.Let me know when you see someone acting scummy.
That's kind of the whole point of my question to you.
I don't really find anyone particularly scummy right now. The game has been going for three hours, my dude. Sometimes people show their asses early but not really very often.I'm sure he'll be playing some Mafia.
Do you actually find anything Sorian has done so far to be scummy? Genuine question.
I know you aren't trying to accuse me with that generalized statement😤Which is why I didn't bite when he went fishing. I'm just not shedding tears and concern trolling when he gets called out.
Have you played with Sorian before? LolWhy? Because of the memes?
This is a really weak excuse to vote Sorian.
Any vote today isn't going to result in learning "absolutely nothing" be it your boat or any other.Every single time you guys lynch me early I flip town and you learn nothing as a result. Why not look for someone actually acting scummy? A Sorian revenge lynch won't tell us anything other than everyone was mad at him for the last game.
So my argument here is you learn absolutely nothing by killing us today and we're better off looking for someone acting scummy.
Why?In fact, the appeal to past games alone is reason enough to cast an eye of suspicion to B-Dubs when easier lines of defense were readily avaliable.
Also, I'm very against lynching Stuart this early, and I will not be voting there.
Seafood fettuccine alfredo. All day, but not really because I'd get fat...-erI'm making tortellini for dinner. It's my favorite pasta. Tell me your favorites while I eat.
We're in this phaseOh, so we're in the phase of day one where we go back and forth over no lynching? It always manages to creep into the mind share almost every game without fail.
I don't know if that's solid because Sorian had so many meme votes that I joked about them getting hammered by accident.
What did he do that stuck out to you? I'm still parsing the conversation (why is everyone talking about Mario Maker?) so I may have missed some of it
If it's a meme that Sorian very often rolls scum or neutral, then sure, because of the memes. Or because town Sorian is 50/50 on helpfulness and scum/neutral Sorian is slippery and will manage to stay alive much longer than he should - believe me, I know. So if d1 ends up without any good reason to vote someone else, he's as good a reason as any. Only drawback is votes may be harder to read otherwise because Sorian would indeed be an easy vote for scum to pile onto, but it would depend on the teammates.
But let's be real, Fran. You won't like anything I do anyway, so what's it matter?
What did he do that stuck out to you? I'm still parsing the conversation (why is everyone talking about Mario Maker?) so I may have missed some of it
But I'll try: Mostly just weak play, attempts to generate discussion without participating in it, and sort of hanging in the background despite there being enough discussion going on to participate as much as anyone else.
No, I'm cool with LP and when he's town he's really sharp, but people ignore him. I'm cool with Sorian, too. But absent anything else, this time, I will vote to kill him early because I don't trust him.You know that Sorian can help town when he isn't too stubborn and start fighting. Even neutral Sorian could help town when it helps him win the game.
And I dissagree with going after a policy lunch because Sorian can be slippery. Should we start lunching LP every time he start playing a game?
And Monkey, it's not personal. I promise. I just don't like people pushing a policy lynch D1.
This is a weird post to open up withEvery single time you guys lynch me early I flip town and you learn nothing as a result. Why not look for someone actually acting scummy? A Sorian revenge lynch won't tell us anything other than everyone was mad at him for the last game.
So my argument here is you learn absolutely nothing by killing us today and we're better off looking for someone acting scummy.
yes, there's so much happening right now, wow
I'm having a weird day, sue me
I think it's quite rare for scum Sorian to be lynched with solid reasoning. I'd bet the instances of it happening are less than the times he's been scum and survived, easily.I do. I had many fights with him before. I also would be very happy lunching Sorian but I'm against going after a policy lynch.