literally me and Stu are most of the discussion
brb, scumhunting myself
(actually, I will brb. I have to play a game for podcast tomorrow.)
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Love Boat 3 Mafia |OT| This time it's Bearsonal
- Thread starter The Bear
- Start date
brb, scumhunting myself
(actually, I will brb. I have to play a game for podcast tomorrow.)
From that to:
That was a big shift in expectations D1 in just a couple hours.
There is a push on him and Sorian which is what he was responding to. Despite all the fluff early on there's still a lot of posts and votes already.
The discussion is almost never useful during D1 itself, though. It's useful in retrospect.
That being said, people are doing much more substantiative stuff this D1 than a lot of other D1's I've been in.
Obfuscating my reads? I'm being more plain that most at the moment. Keep looking for those excuses.
Already shaded by my lover but past games can't assert innocence but they can justify meme votes....?
Ehhhhh, we've definitely learned nothing from a day 1 vote before, let's not pretend. We are all aware you read house of horrors.
You bolded the wrong part. What you should have bolded was the phrase "this time" because it's a weird inclusion and you should expand on that. Why "this time" specifically? And since you seem so policy driven this time, I better not here "because Love Boat 2 was a shit show."
Who do you feel has contributed more meaningful discussion than Stu since you feel his contributions have been in the background?
Okay perhaps I should specify that any vote will result in an outcome we can learn from, but actually learning said things is not always a given lol
Gnocchi is potatoes, not pasta.
That's the only thing from page 4(?) I'm responding to.
mmmmmm some highly questionable stuff here
hammering sorian would've been hiilarious tho ngl
anywho im townie af
hammering sorian would've been hiilarious tho ngl
anywho im townie af
Don't really like Fanto's reach on Monkey. Seems like a weak read to earn townie points.
Feel pretty good about Natiko and Kits. Not into the policy lynch on Sorian.
Feel pretty good about Natiko and Kits. Not into the policy lynch on Sorian.
This was a really odd post to me until I realized you aren't Fanto. Damn your avatar.
Fantomas Can you make one of those spider-man pointing at spider-man memes but with chloe and somehow denoting that one chloe is you and one is bae?
What don't you like about it? I think she was the one being weak.
What do you like about Natiko? I see him quoting a lot of people, but I don't takeaway a lot of those exchanges I feel like.
Kits feels normal to me, but I'd say her usual eccentric behavior is NAI.
I'm the real Chloe!
If it continues to happen, I will.
Pirate Bae. You. Me. B-Dubs. Even Sorian, despite the overagressive tunneling. Dr. Monkey. Fran.
Somebody's getting extra hamburgers tonight <3
Why do I not trust you're gonna expand on that?
You can make gnocchi out of a lot of different of stuff, but whatever.
Know that you're on my list now though.
I was being snarky before and I think the point got lost because your focused on the word partners instead but I'm not sure you have the definition of tunneling down correctly btw. You could say I'm shading you a bunch at best but I'd need to be voting you or very actively trying to get people to be voting for you before you can really throw around tunneling. Also, how does Bae or Fran make it on your list? (Or B-Dubs for that matter).
I can think you're tunneling on me without you voting on me. You're getting upset over meaningless technicalities. Unless there's a word in the mafia lingo for "Overagressive double downing on someone without showing your work or even appearing to care about optics".
okay I'm actually caught up now
1. I don't get the fighting between Kitsunelaine and Sorian. I mean, I see how it started, but don't really see why it's kept going.
2. Fanto, I do not think I have ever been in a game with both you and Dr. Monkey in which you don't scum read her.
3. I'm not sure there's actually such thing as a policy lynch on D1. Policy lynch usually comes after a specific trigger. So...
1. I don't get the fighting between Kitsunelaine and Sorian. I mean, I see how it started, but don't really see why it's kept going.
2. Fanto, I do not think I have ever been in a game with both you and Dr. Monkey in which you don't scum read her.
3. I'm not sure there's actually such thing as a policy lynch on D1. Policy lynch usually comes after a specific trigger. So...
but ... but ...
I keep misreading your name as Reiki and, when are you going to bestow upon us your magical healing hands
I don't fucking get it either. All I see Sorian doing is looking for excuses to keep it going and they're getting on my scum list for their efforts.
Vote: Kitsunelaine
Something about this list and who's included makes me feel off.
Something about this list and who's included makes me feel off.
Not a fan of this post. Comes across as you just wanting to save your own ass with a pretty weak excuse. Just because you were mislynched in the past doesn't mean you'll never be scum. There isn't really any reason to take you at face value. I'd also expect someone who was so scared of being lynched to participate more in a meaningful manner, but you havent done much aside from defend yourself.
Plus there were only three votes on you two at the time of this post. Why are you so antsy already?
And I'm sure if I didn't provide a list, you'd vote for me all the same.
<3
Vote: Stuart444
I currently read Sorian as a potential misguided town, fishing for reactions.
I don't like your read because it's easy. You're attacking one of the few people actually contributing to D1 so far, which makes it easy material to latch onto and try to score town cred.
Natiko feels pretty normal to me. Which is why I have a good feeling. It's NAI right now; I'm just going with my gut.
(Mostly because I can't imagine a scum dumb enough to fish in such a misguided and unfounded way.)
The double Chloe is really messing me up lol
Could you elaborate on this?
Ok I laughed.
Just remember the nice avatar is all about money and nothing about esoterism.
Several people on that list hasn't contributed as much and it makes me feel like she chose random names to try and justify her opinions on me.
Feels very suspicious/off to me.
I know Sorian already asked but I noticed you didn't respond - what stood out to you from Bae, B-Dubs, and to a lesser extent Fran? Bae's posts have mostly just been her saying she's confused, B-Dubs just briefly defended himself and bounced, and while Fran's have been a little meatier I wouldn't say they stand out above Stu's contributions.
I think they're meatier because they're at least engaging and participating. It's not about length of contribution, but substance of contribution. I don't really see anything of substance with how Stu's been playing/
B-Dubs? Really? I can almost believe the others, but he stands out as his only post of actual game relevant content is defending himself and saying we shouldn't lynch him because he gets mislynched too much, which ain't a great argument.
Pirate Bae also literally has two posts...
I don't really see the logic behind this. There's nothing stopping her from going back and looking at who's made more posts and making a selection there, but she instead went with people popping up in her head so we got like B-Dubs who probably made a much bigger impression.
I dunno, is there that much going on right now? There sure are a lot of posts, but I don't feel like any proper throughline is being established. Aside from whether to lynch Sorian because of previous history or not.
Okay you guys need to slow down with the posts.
Fantomas I have not played Life is Strange. Sorry to disappoint
The real problem is how random it is. I get that Stuart was trying to create meaningful conversation, but that literally doesn't go anywhere, so there's no reason to post it.
Why are you going full defensive on day 1 with minimal pressure?
Fantomas I have not played Life is Strange. Sorry to disappoint
I mentioned this to Reki in our chat, but I've seen something like this used as a way to get on the newbies side. It can create a false sense of security whenever in conversation with that person.
The real problem is how random it is. I get that Stuart was trying to create meaningful conversation, but that literally doesn't go anywhere, so there's no reason to post it.
Why are you going full defensive on day 1 with minimal pressure?
Uh, you want to elaborate on that vote?
B-Dubs at least did SOMETHING. I even pointed out how bad that thing was, but it was participating, not just poking the fire with a stick. I saw Pirate Bae engaging with other users in a way I didn't really see Stu do-- Stu seems disengaged from the goings on.