Wait, wut? The best scenario you can creste in your head after seeing TFA is that Luke is maybe trying to discover something to help the resistence to defeat TFO.
I...
What?
Wait, wut? The best scenario you can creste in your head after seeing TFA is that Luke is maybe trying to discover something to help the resistence to defeat TFO.
Well in the context of the force being real that is a plan. He was seeking knowledge and guidance on how to proceed, not giving up to go die :P why else would he have been thought, by those who knew him, to be searching for the first Jedi Temple.
Like?I agree that I think TFA didn't frame Luke as having a plan at all. However, I think it showed a few signs that Finn is force sensitive.
Just because the characters believe something doesn't mean it's true. Luke had a whole mythology built around his character by virtue of the writers doing it intentionally. Idk how you could watch TLJ and come to the conclusion Luke went to the island to do anything but live the rest of his life in relative seclusion.Snoke told Hux to blow up an entire system because they merely thought the Resistance might have learned where Luke was hiding. That should tell you how afraid and important Luke was. Not even all seeing Snoke believed Luke went to a tiny island to die in peace. The framing was quite clear that Luke was up to something.
Snoke told Hux to blow up an entire system because they merely thought the Resistance might have learned where Luke was hiding. That should tell you how afraid and important Luke was. Not even all seeing Snoke believed Luke went to a tiny island to die in peace. The framing was quite clear that Luke was up to something.
Maybe it was just bad editing, but we hear the screams of people on the planets being blown up when Finn is onscreen at one point, then he turns around and looks up into the sky. To me, I took it as him feeling the large loss. Could be wrong, and maybe it is because I love Finn that I hope he is force sensitive.There's no way, bro. If that was true, they would have brought it up in TLJ.
Snoke told Hux to blow up an entire system because they merely thought the Resistance might have learned where Luke was hiding. That should tell you how afraid and important Luke was. Not even all seeing Snoke believed Luke went to a tiny island to die in peace. The framing was quite clear that Luke was up to something.
Maybe it was just bad editing, but we hear the screams of people on the planets being blown up when Finn is onscreen at one point, then he turns around and looks up into the sky. To me, I took it as him feeling the large loss. Could be wrong, and maybe it is because I love Finn that I hope Finn is force sensitive.
If Luke was just going to find answers or whatnot, why would he just abandon his friends and family for 6 years and not show up when they were facing certain death?
Personally, I never took it this way because we never see anyone there scream by Finn, or hardly make a noise. After Finn, we see Han outside Maz place with a large group, and they are all quietly staring into the sky, then Finn runs over from wherever his ship was that he was boarding. The only time we see hear screaming that is matched with anyone on screen it is when we are on the one planet itself being blown up, watching them look at the death laser coming for their faces.
Maybe it was just bad editing, but we hear the screams of people on the planets being blown up when Finn is onscreen at one point, then he turns around and looks up into the sky. To me, I took it as him feeling the large loss. Could be wrong, and maybe it is because I love Finn that I hope he is force sensitive.
Strongly frames?
Between this and "TFA hinted that Finn has force powers" I'm convinced Star Wars fans just make up what they want to see.
I agree a ton with some of this BUT because of all of this and what Luke used to be is why I think Luke from The Last Jedi can be so damn interesting. I think TLJ's biggest fault was not giving us enough time with Luke to make me really feel for him and his fucked up situation, and understand how he went from one to the other. I wanted more Luke.I'm surprised some people are so adamant about defending the movie that they don't get why many people believe Luke Skywalker, one of the most determined and heroic characters in Sci Fi, was simply not in The Last Jedi.
Is it really so unbelievable that it's weird to people that Luke would go to extreme lengths to save his father from the dark side, but apparently runs in fear of and even tries to kill his own nephew?
Why did Luke Skywalker even need to be deconstructed? Why did the farmboy that defeated the Sith with compassion end up spending the last years of his life hiding away on some rock because he didn't care? And don't give me some convoluted excuse about how he hid because he cared too much - Luke Skywalker, the guy that was integral to defeating the Empire, would not have just turned his back on the galaxy and allowed the First Order to rise up and nuke five planets.
Rian Johnson legitimately destroyed one of the most iconic Sci Fi heroes of all time and all we got for it was one badass scene that could have been in any version of the script.
I still don't get why Luke can't have been searching for some ancient Jedi knowledge or wisdom to help him rebuild the Order, only to realise through the course of the movie that he doesn't have to do everything himself. He saved the Force from being permanently corrupted by Palpatine, he played the part the Force had chosen him to play. Now it's up to Rey and Ben to decide what happens next.
There's nothing wrong with Luke being integral to taking out the First Order, either. The First Order, Starkiller Base, even Snoke himself was just background noise added to make the conflict seem bigger and flashier than it is, since obviously they couldn't figure out how to take a clash of ideologies about the future of the Force and make a trilogy out of it without basically bringing back the Empire and the Rebels.
I'm surprised it's a point of contention but the guy Mark Hamill plays in The Last Jedi is no more Luke Skywalker than the guy Henry Cavill plays in Man of Steel is Superman. I don't care if Luke had to be that way for the story to work, either - when you're working with legacy characters, you change the story around them and not them around the story.
But what about my reason above?! I'm not pulling that out of my butt!
I'm surprised some people are so adamant about defending the movie that they don't get why many people believe Luke Skywalker, one of the most determined and heroic characters in Sci Fi, was simply not in The Last Jedi.
Is it really so unbelievable that it's weird to people that Luke would go to extreme lengths to save his father from the dark side, but apparently runs in fear of and even tries to kill his own nephew?
Why did Luke Skywalker even need to be deconstructed? Why did the farmboy that defeated the Sith with compassion end up spending the last years of his life hiding away on some rock because he didn't care? And don't give me some convoluted excuse about how he hid because he cared too much - Luke Skywalker, the guy that was integral to defeating the Empire, would not have just turned his back on the galaxy and allowed the First Order to rise up and nuke five planets.
Rian Johnson legitimately destroyed one of the most iconic Sci Fi heroes of all time and all we got for it was one badass scene that could have been in any version of the script.
I still don't get why Luke can't have been searching for some ancient Jedi knowledge or wisdom to help him rebuild the Order, only to realise through the course of the movie that he doesn't have to do everything himself. He saved the Force from being permanently corrupted by Palpatine, he played the part the Force had chosen him to play. Now it's up to Rey and Ben to decide what happens next.
There's nothing wrong with Luke being integral to taking out the First Order, either. The First Order, Starkiller Base, even Snoke himself was just background noise added to make the conflict seem bigger and flashier than it is, since obviously they couldn't figure out how to take a clash of ideologies about the future of the Force and make a trilogy out of it without basically bringing back the Empire and the Rebels.
I'm surprised it's a point of contention but the guy Mark Hamill plays in The Last Jedi is no more Luke Skywalker than the guy Henry Cavill plays in Man of Steel is Superman. I don't care if Luke had to be that way for the story to work, either - when you're working with legacy characters, you change the story around them and not them around the story.
I'm surprised some people are so adamant about defending the movie that they don't get why many people believe Luke Skywalker, one of the most determined and heroic characters in Sci Fi, was simply not in The Last Jedi.
Is it really so unbelievable that it's weird to people that Luke would go to extreme lengths to save his father from the dark side, but apparently runs in fear of and even tries to kill his own nephew?
Why did Luke Skywalker even need to be deconstructed? Why did the farmboy that defeated the Sith with compassion end up spending the last years of his life hiding away on some rock because he didn't care? And don't give me some convoluted excuse about how he hid because he cared too much - Luke Skywalker, the guy that was integral to defeating the Empire, would not have just turned his back on the galaxy and allowed the First Order to rise up and nuke five planets.
Rian Johnson legitimately destroyed one of the most iconic Sci Fi heroes of all time and all we got for it was one badass scene that could have been in any version of the script.
I still don't get why Luke can't have been searching for some ancient Jedi knowledge or wisdom to help him rebuild the Order, only to realise through the course of the movie that he doesn't have to do everything himself. He saved the Force from being permanently corrupted by Palpatine, he played the part the Force had chosen him to play. Now it's up to Rey and Ben to decide what happens next.
There's nothing wrong with Luke being integral to taking out the First Order, either. The First Order, Starkiller Base, even Snoke himself was just background noise added to make the conflict seem bigger and flashier than it is, since obviously they couldn't figure out how to take a clash of ideologies about the future of the Force and make a trilogy out of it without basically bringing back the Empire and the Rebels.
I'm surprised it's a point of contention but the guy Mark Hamill plays in The Last Jedi is no more Luke Skywalker than the guy Henry Cavill plays in Man of Steel is Superman. I don't care if Luke had to be that way for the story to work, either - when you're working with legacy characters, you change the story around them and not them around the story.
Don't say it like that...you make it sound like all hope is lost. I have to hold onto hope.Sorry Vincent Alexander but we got bamboozled with the marketing. They wanted to make it a twist that Rey was the Force sensitive one, so they marketed it as Finn being the new main character who would be the new Jedi.
Also the families of all the students who died.Imagine doing the worst thing you've ever done (or almost did) to family. The catastrophic effects of that action and then having to face the rest of your family afterward.
Dude, you haven't even seen the movie. lol
Maybe that's a picture of him in a theater about to finally watch it.
Wait. You legit haven't seen it? I will buy your movie ticket if you just go see the damn thing.
Yo!I'm surprised some people are so adamant about defending the movie that they don't get why many people believe Luke Skywalker, one of the most determined and heroic characters in Sci Fi, was simply not in The Last Jedi.
Is it really so unbelievable that it's weird to people that Luke would go to extreme lengths to save his father from the dark side, but apparently runs in fear of and even tries to kill his own nephew?
Why did Luke Skywalker even need to be deconstructed? Why did the farmboy that defeated the Sith with compassion end up spending the last years of his life hiding away on some rock because he didn't care? And don't give me some convoluted excuse about how he hid because he cared too much - Luke Skywalker, the guy that was integral to defeating the Empire, would not have just turned his back on the galaxy and allowed the First Order to rise up and nuke five planets.
Rian Johnson legitimately destroyed one of the most iconic Sci Fi heroes of all time and all we got for it was one badass scene that could have been in any version of the script.
I still don't get why Luke can't have been searching for some ancient Jedi knowledge or wisdom to help him rebuild the Order, only to realise through the course of the movie that he doesn't have to do everything himself. He saved the Force from being permanently corrupted by Palpatine, he played the part the Force had chosen him to play. Now it's up to Rey and Ben to decide what happens next.
There's nothing wrong with Luke being integral to taking out the First Order, either. The First Order, Starkiller Base, even Snoke himself was just background noise added to make the conflict seem bigger and flashier than it is, since obviously they couldn't figure out how to take a clash of ideologies about the future of the Force and make a trilogy out of it without basically bringing back the Empire and the Rebels.
I'm surprised it's a point of contention but the guy Mark Hamill plays in The Last Jedi is no more Luke Skywalker than the guy Henry Cavill plays in Man of Steel is Superman. I don't care if Luke had to be that way for the story to work, either - when you're working with legacy characters, you change the story around them and not them around the story.
Even the script direction for the final scene of TFA ends the movie by being ambiguous as to Luke's purpose dude. You guys are hinging on one line from Han and ignoring the rest of the movie around it.
In self defense, why not?You want a scene where Luke Skywalker butchers his former students? And people say I'm delusional. Ayyyy.
I'm surprised some people are so adamant about defending the movie that they don't get why many people believe Luke Skywalker, one of the most determined and heroic characters in Sci Fi, was simply not in The Last Jedi.
Is it really so unbelievable that it's weird to people that Luke would go to extreme lengths to save his father from the dark side, but apparently runs in fear of and even tries to kill his own nephew?
Why did Luke Skywalker even need to be deconstructed? Why did the farmboy that defeated the Sith with compassion end up spending the last years of his life hiding away on some rock because he didn't care? And don't give me some convoluted excuse about how he hid because he cared too much - Luke Skywalker, the guy that was integral to defeating the Empire, would not have just turned his back on the galaxy and allowed the First Order to rise up and nuke five planets.
Rian Johnson legitimately destroyed one of the most iconic Sci Fi heroes of all time and all we got for it was one badass scene that could have been in any version of the script.
I still don't get why Luke can't have been searching for some ancient Jedi knowledge or wisdom to help him rebuild the Order, only to realise through the course of the movie that he doesn't have to do everything himself. He saved the Force from being permanently corrupted by Palpatine, he played the part the Force had chosen him to play. Now it's up to Rey and Ben to decide what happens next.
There's nothing wrong with Luke being integral to taking out the First Order, either. The First Order, Starkiller Base, even Snoke himself was just background noise added to make the conflict seem bigger and flashier than it is, since obviously they couldn't figure out how to take a clash of ideologies about the future of the Force and make a trilogy out of it without basically bringing back the Empire and the Rebels.
I'm surprised it's a point of contention but the guy Mark Hamill plays in The Last Jedi is no more Luke Skywalker than the guy Henry Cavill plays in Man of Steel is Superman. I don't care if Luke had to be that way for the story to work, either - when you're working with legacy characters, you change the story around them and not them around the story.
It's not so hard to believe that people end up becoming a shell of their former selves. Obi-Wan and Yoda went and peaced out for 20+ years and did nothing while letting the Empire grow because they were caught up in their own failures. The same can be said for Luke. These characters were at a peak until something really fucking bad happens and then they come back down to earth and realize that they're not who they thought they were. Luke even says it in the movie. His hubris lead to believe he can train a whole new group of Jedi. Because he was a legend. He was wrong.
You can't expect characters to be constantly climbing up or else they would just become boring. Seeing them hit a low point and then us seeing them find a way to learn again makes for a better storyline. This is why Luke imo shows to be more powerful than the legends of Yoda and Obi-Wan because he actually learned something. No one knew about Obi-Wan following his death, but damn well everyone knew of Luke Skywalker when he died. He wasn't just some 'myth' anymore.
Heroes fall. All the time. It's just a matter of how they come to rise from it. Luke Skywalker is no exception.
I think the reasons why Luke decided to cut himself off the from the force are debatable, but it was absolutely necessary based on how he was set up in TFA, and his characterization in the OT.
30 years passed. Instead of training new jedi at the center of the most prominent city in the galaxy he instead had the jedi hidden away. Note:after the jedi were rendered nearly extinct by order 66, the empire released a metric fuckton of propaganda about them. So that's two decades worth of propaganda. Then comes Luke Skywalker, a dude who supposedly turned Darth Vader good and killed the emperor a mere four years after single handedly blowing up the death star. Meanwhile, he's nowhere to be found but legend has it that he's training a new generation of jedi. You can see how to the average person this can sound a bit made up? Most people don't even know the force exists in the first place.
Actually I was mistaken, wasn't his first mission. He was apparently an ideal stormtrooper during his training but his morality was a factor.
. I don't care if Luke had to be that way for the story to work, either - when you're working with legacy characters, you change the story around them and not them around the story.
Good thing g Luke was still consistent with his OT portrayal then!
I grew up with the original trilogy. When books that take place after Jedi started coming out it was amazing.
We got to see Luke and family get married have kids. Leia and Han married and kids.
Luke starts his academy. The Young Jedi books.
Luke getting married and having his own kid.
Luke and friends/family on various adventures and despite hardships they would win.
The video games that added even more lore.
Years and years of Luke and co being heroes and being happy.
Then we get the new trilogy and all that old lore is gone (and yeah some of it was bad but a lot of it was good).
And the new stuff shows Han and Leia haven't really changed. But Luke, the hero, not just of the old movies but in a lot of good books is a broken man who dies.
Some people wonder why this bothers a lot of fans? That's why. They took our hero for years and years and broke him
what's with all the luke is dead talk, where did that come from. don't we see him back on the island at the end?
what's with all the luke is dead talk, where did that come from. don't we see him back on the island at the end?
Good thing g Luke was still consistent with his OT portrayal then!
Disagree entirely.Good thing g Luke was still consistent with his OT portrayal then!
I care too much for my family that Im ashamed to see them after I also cared so much about my family that I came within an arm's reach of killing my family over a moment's feeling of the dark side.Some of you hold Luke to an unbelievably weird standard, elevating him far above the faults human beings normally display.
People have done far weirder and worse things when it comes to family in reality, yet I'm supposed to believe it's impossible for Luke to exhibit anything remotely similar?
Give me a break.
Ahahahahahwhat's with all the luke is dead talk, where did that come from. don't we see him back on the island at the end?
not really, even mark hamill said as much, and i quote "I said to Rian, Jedi's dont give up. I mean, even if Luke had a problem, he would maybe take a year to try to regroup. But if he made a mistake, he would try to right that wrong, so right there, we had a fundamental difference. But its not my story anymore. It's somebody else's story, and Rian needed me to be a certain way to make the ending effective."
I mean, u can disagree that TLJ Luke isn't the same as OT Luke, but the guy who actually played Luke's Character disagree's with you.
I'm soo glad you mention that actually! Because he's recently gone on record multiple times backing on his statements and saying that he was wrong. He also says he regrets ever voicing such opinions because people like you try to use it against the movie.
Btw did you end up actually watching the movie yet?
bitch i watched it opening night with the T-mobile Tuesday buy ticket for 5 dollars. is that how you discredit or dismiss people, by saying if they even watched the movie?
if he cut himself off from the force he wouldn't be able to use force projection would he.