Absolutely loved SSSC! One of the rare games where I actually liked all of their characters you encounter and the music is pretty damn memorable. Like, I still hum quite a bit of it to this day whenever I'm working on stuff.
Last edited:
I'm not as harsh, but I don't think you're far off. Lunar 1 is a pretty good game elevated to greatness by an excellent soundtrack & the amazing-for-its-time localization which let the characters & world shine. The CD tech which was still new also didn't hurt. It would not be anywhere near as beloved if it got a bog-standard 90's mediocre translation.
Lunar: EB, on the other hand, is arguably the best 16-bit JRPG of all-time.
"DEBATE ME" after calling something "C-tier" with no extrapolation at all.
No.
I would love to see someone rip this video and reprocess it using AI.On topic: I think the absolute best thing about SSSC is there making of CD. Not just because it was my first real experience with behind the scenes game development, but because the multiplayer pong mini game was secretly the best party game of the 90's.
So, if only the game didn't have great artwork, amazing music, and a for-its-time complex story, a game focused on art, sound, and story would have been totally a flop.
In fact I'll go one step further and say the Sega CD version has an overall better OST on every level
That said, I feel like the PSX/Saturn version of Eternal Blue is wholly a better game. Removed the really dumb "pay to save" mechanic, and it doesn't change the story.
That said, i feel like the animations in the Sega CD version of EB are way more impressive for the hardware than the FMV in the PSX/Saturn version.
Hey werezompire,The in-game graphics aren't as good as what Square was doing on the SNES at the time and the cutscenes are a pale shadow of what they would do with the sequel. The plot wasn't any more complex than some of the other RPGs coming out around then like the FF games. The game's really short for the time and Luna being in your party for such a short time (which is something they fixed in the remake) hurt the emotional core of the plot. Soundtrack is great but lots of 16-bit RPGs have great soundtracks.
The localization was a big part of what made the Lunar games special. People just weren't localizing RPGs like that back then and it really stood out.
I never said it was a bad game. I like Lunar 1 a lot (although I like the remake more) but I love Lunar: EB and feel it's a huge improvement over the original, in a similar way to Persona 4 is a huge improvement over Persona 3. And like P4 vs P4, I totally understand some people liking the older game more.
You're being awful aggressive and dismissive of other opinions for someone who did a drive-by to complain that the thread topic was inferior to the older game.
No. Do not skip the first game.Hey werezompire,
since I've read this thread, I'm now interested in the Lunar series.
Which version of Lunar 1 would you recommend ?
I've never played any Lunar game.
As you wrote that Eternal Blue is the superior game, should I skip Lunar 1 and start with EBC?
Don't skip Lunar 1.Hey werezompire,
since I've read this thread, I'm now interested in the Lunar series.
Which version of Lunar 1 would you recommend ?
I've never played any Lunar game.
As you wrote that Eternal Blue is the superior game, should I skip Lunar 1 and start with EBC?
Oh alright.
The in-game graphics aren't as good as what Square was doing on the SNES at the time and the cutscenes are a pale shadow of what they would do with the sequel.
The plot wasn't any more complex than some of the other RPGs coming out around then like the FF games. The game's really short for the time and Luna being in your party for such a short time (which is something they fixed in the remake) hurt the emotional core of the plot. Soundtrack is great but lots of 16-bit RPGs have great soundtracks.
The localization was a big part of what made the Lunar games special. People just weren't localizing RPGs like that back then and it really stood out.
Hey werezompire,
since I've read this thread, I'm now interested in the Lunar series.
Which version of Lunar 1 would you recommend ?
I've never played any Lunar game.
As you wrote that Eternal Blue is the superior game, should I skip Lunar 1 and start with EBC?
Hey werezompire,
since I've read this thread, I'm now interested in the Lunar series.
Which version of Lunar 1 would you recommend ?
I've never played any Lunar game.
As you wrote that Eternal Blue is the superior game, should I skip Lunar 1 and start with EBC?
The order in which I personally played them, and still love them to this day: L1PSX->L2PSX->L1SCD->L2SCD
Nice thank you.With Lunar 1, you've got these choices: original Sega CD, PS1 (or Saturn if you import), GBA, PSP, and iOS. GBA version is really pared down so that's automatically out. PSP version had its heart in the right place, but has some issues (which have been mentioned before). I think the PS1 version is a big improvement over the SCD version so I'd recommend that one. I haven't played it, but I hear the iOS version is mostly based on the PS1 so that could also be an option.
I played EB first and I think it works really well in reverse order. EB takes place a long time after the first one so the events of the first game are the stuff of legend - it gives the world a nice lived-in feel and could even make your more excited to play the original game afterwards. EB is only available on Sega CD or PS1 and there isn't a huge difference between the two, so probably grab PS1 since that's more accessible (since you can play it on a PS2 or PS3).
Lunar 2 works best played after 1. I know some people who've only played 2 and really enjoyed it, but some of the biggest plot points are direct continuations from the first game.As you wrote that Eternal Blue is the superior game, should I skip Lunar 1 and start with EBC?
Nice thank you.
I will try to get Lunar 1 and Lunar EBC on PS1 then.
I like the classic 16 bit era RPGs, or games like Suikoden, Final Fantasy or Terranigma.
So I will enjoy this I hope.
I see, figured as much. I think Lunar 1 is available on the US PSN?Lunar 2 works best played after 1. I know some people who've only played 2 and really enjoyed it, but some of the biggest plot points are direct continuations from the first game.
Give 1 a try first of you can get ahold of it. If you can't, for some reason, bring yourself to beat it, then give 2 a try. The level curve of 2 is a lot smoother, and with much fewer difficulty spikes.
I see, figured as much. I think Lunar 1 is available on the US PSN?
Should be easy to get it then.
The 1st has two CDs and EBC three CDs ? Is that correct?
I've enjoyed Grandia, when I've played the remaster version, which was released this year.If you like the Final Fantasy games, you'll undoubtedly like Lunar, as it was the closest thing to a final fantasy game outside of the SNES at the time. They're much more similar than, say, Phantasy Star or Shining Force is to Final Fantasy (note: if you haven't played Phantasy Star IV or Shining Force II, you definitely need to).
Lunar is basically the precursor to Grandia.
The cutscenes are ingame graphics, they are not FMVs. They are made with sprites and tiled backgrounds and everything you think in game graphics are. Lunar is one of the best showcases of the technology on the system.
So your bar for "bog standard average" are the final fantasy games? This is what I'm talking about, the standard for "average" is all sorts of skewed in this comparison. Lunar is very much a top-tier RPG for that era, calling is C-tier is just silly.
Lunar was huge in Japan before it ever got localized. It's not because people were starved for games or didn't know any better, world-wide Lunar was a hit (as much as an RPG could be a world-wide "hit" back in those days, granted), even in the land that produced the most RPGs at the time.
I've enjoyed Grandia, when I've played the remaster version, which was released this year.
Sounds very nice, so this would be right up my alley.
I've only played PS I, when it was released on Switch via Sega Ages.
But I will definitely try PS IV and Shining Force II.
Shining Force II was an SRPG right?
Oh bummer, I hope I can find a good copy for an reasonable price on eBay or a 2nd hand shop.Unfortunately, neither of them are available anywhere digitally and used copies of the PlayStation remakes are quite expensive.
None of the Lunar games are on the PSN.
You know that I know all this since you've heard me talk about how we specifically designed the cutscenes in our last game to emulate the SCD Lunar cutscene style. I meant gameplay graphics.
Yes and they didn't need a great localization in Japan because it was already in Japanese. Not having a good localization would have hurt the game in English. I'm not sure why this is something you want to argue.
Lunar SSS has been remade and ported a number of times. The iOS version was pretty alright when I played it a few years ago but I'm not sure if it's even available. There's also a PSP remake that's generally cheaper although it's a bit different than SSD or SSSC. Eternal Blue has only been released on Sega CD, Saturn and PS1.What's the easiest way to play this series outside of hoping for re release
All this also ignores that several people do not like the localization. I like the lunar games in spite of their localization, not because of them. Ys Book I & II had a wholly better localization than Lunar anyways. Yet you don't see people talking that way about Ys.
Ah wish they would release both of them for switchLunar SSS has been remade and ported a number of times. The iOS version was pretty alright when I played it a few years ago but I'm not sure if it's even available. There's also a PSP remake that's generally cheaper although it's a bit different than SSD or SSSC. Eternal Blue has only been released on Sega CD, Saturn and PS1.
The visuals for the iOS version are from the PS1/Saturn remake.I'd only heard of this game on and off for years until the PSP version came out and I heard it was actually made by Game Arts, and Grandia II is one of my favorite games so I tried out the PSP demo a while back. I thought it was nice, the writing seemed good and the gameplay seemed snappy, but sort of put it on my shelf of "games I might buy someday". Which version is the best though? The iOS version seems like the easiest one to get and it's only $7. It looks like it's based on one of the earlier versions though, possibly even the Sega CD version. Is there a good breakdown between all versions?
And looking at Game Arts' library, it looks like I need to track down more of their games in general, like Gungriffon and such.
Strong agree. The PS1's synth OST was weak compared to Sega CD's redbook audio. Felt way less epic.In fact I'll go one step further and say the Sega CD version has an overall better OST on every level