• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
OP
SigmasonicX

SigmasonicX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,499
Huh, not sure what happened to that link. Thanks, updated.
Alright, read it. The part that stuck out to me is the discussion about the conflict between making the game as good a game as it can be, and making a game that sells well. Someone covered that topic too when reviewing Masters 25, though I don't remember who. To Jeff's credit, he points out that Richard Garfield is all aboard the "the game has to sell well" side and thus doesn't romanticize him too much.

Much of the article is about how Pro Tours / Mythic Championships need to get better coverage again, and, well, yeah.
 

Bigkrev

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,314
Entry is $99, and entry for a "normal" limited set, GP Madison, is $85
I know they just said "No more MSRP", but I really want to know what the price of packs is going to be. That price seems low for $10 a pack
 
Oct 28, 2017
6,119
Premium pricing seems like a real mistake. Part of the allure of the Battlebond and Conspiracy sets is that they're different but affordable. 7 a pop means drafts are $25 or more, which means stores are going to run one or two and then move on. Disappointing.
 

ZealousD

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,303
We still don't know what the set contains so it's difficult to say whether the premium price is justified or not.

Let's be honest. Lots of people complained about the super high pricepoint on Ultimate Masters, but there was so much ridiculous reprint value and the set sold so well that tons of Modern staples cratered in value.
 

Bigkrev

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,314
We still don't know what the set contains so it's difficult to say whether the premium price is justified or not.

Let's be honest. Lots of people complained about the super high pricepoint on Ultimate Masters, but there was so much ridiculous reprint value and the set sold so well that tons of Modern staples cratered in value.
I think 96% of people complaining about prices would have gone away if they had announced MSRP as "$9.99 for individual booster packs, $335 for sealed booster boxes with Ultimate Box Toppers". The issue I (and likely a lot of people had) was that they thought the MSRP for packs was going to be $14 (335/24)
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,109
I think they were pretty clear about ending the premium priced booster reprint product. It's probably the entire reason they retired the masters series, so they could lower the price on future such products and still maintain the masters brand as an expensive thing. The thing to realize is that anything brought to any market in a signifigantly broad manner will never be able to maintain initial buy in price. That is to say, modern masters was able to command a high price as long as its print run was extremely limited, almost no matter what was actually in the set. As soon as they started sending masters boosters to big retailers the bottom fell out and values just weren't able to be maintained. They should have lowered prices on masters products a while ago, and they're probably going to wind up *essentially* doing just that. The product just wont be called masters.
 

Deleted member 12224

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
6,113
Lands and Spells - Jeff Cunningham

This article might not resound as much for people who haven't been playing a long time, but was absolutely blown away by it. Hard to summarize -- would recommend reading the whole thing -- but for people who start it, the old-school tournament report isn't the whole thing; it's used as a framework to get to a deeper discussion of playing and following Magic into 2019. (Written by Jeff Cunningham, who was one of the all-time best Magic writers during the time when people invested talent and energy into being that.)
A fantastic read and the report format (and Cunningham's not-ever-changed profile picture) brought back a lot of nostalgia.

Clicking the bookmark "brainburst" always gives me a nostalgia hit, as well.

EDIT: to add something more, I thought this was a concise way of summing up something I've thought but couldn't quite put into words.
When I look at the cards I began playing with, I marvel at their integrity. There's no hint of commercialism in their design. No "remember, your audience is BOYS 14 and up." No branded characters on endless hero's journeys.
 
Last edited:

Bigkrev

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,314
A fantastic read and the report format (and Cunningham's not-ever-changed profile picture) brought back a lot of nostalgia.

Clicking the bookmark "brainburst" always gives me a nostalgia hit, as well.

EDIT: to add something more, I thought this was a concise way of summing up something I've thought but couldn't quite put into words.
I still use "brainburst.com" to access Magic TCGplayer TO THIS DAY lol
 
OP
OP
SigmasonicX

SigmasonicX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,499
Since the event was taken down, here's an image.
ExT1lBU.jpg


Modern Horizons definitely makes me think this will be like Future Sight. It was odd that MaRo would be so excited about a set that just put cards directly into Modern, and the way he worded things before made it seem like it wasn't necessarily in the nature of his design for it to be a Modern product, but it being Future Sight 2: Electric Boogaloo makes a lot more sense for his excitement.
 
Oct 28, 2017
6,119
Since the event was taken down, here's an image.
ExT1lBU.jpg


Modern Horizons definitely makes me think this will be like Future Sight. It was odd that MaRo would be so excited about a set that just put cards directly into Modern, and the way he worded things before made it seem like it wasn't necessarily in the nature of his design for it to be a Modern product, but it being Future Sight 2: Electric Boogaloo makes a lot more sense for his excitement.

Now this is exciting. I really hope so.
 
OP
OP
SigmasonicX

SigmasonicX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,499
What specifically do you mean when you say this?
Future Sight was a wacky experimental set filled with "cards from the future", along with the "mix and match" cards from the rest of the Time Spiral block that combined mechanics from all throughout Magic. Mechanics like delve and several individual cards made their debut here. It proved to be too complex for most players, but many experienced players liked it a lot, including the developers. It's been a common request to have another set like it, and I imagine this is it. Check the link for the cards.
 

ZealousD

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,303
Future Sight was a wacky experimental set filled with "cards from the future", along with the "mix and match" cards from the rest of the Time Spiral block that combined mechanics from all throughout Magic. Mechanics like delve and several individual cards made their debut here. It proved to be too complex for most players, but many experienced players liked it a lot, including the developers. It's been a common request to have another set like it, and I imagine this is it. Check the link for the cards.

I know what Future Sight is. I was just curious to what extent you think a set called "Modern Horizons" can be like that.

The cards in the set have to be applicable to the Modern format in order for the set to be called "Modern Horizons" so any new cards by definition can't slide into Modern without WotC simply stating that this set is an exception to the rule. Do you think the product is Modern reprints + Timeshifted cards? Because that's more like "Modern and Horizons", not "Modern Horizons", if that makes sense.
 
OP
OP
SigmasonicX

SigmasonicX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,499
The cards in the set have to be applicable to the Modern format in order for the set to be called "Modern Horizons" so any new cards by definition can't slide into Modern without WotC simply stating that this set is an exception to the rule. Do you think the product is Modern reprints + Timeshifted cards? Because that's more like "Modern and Horizons", not "Modern Horizons", if that makes sense.
They've been hinting at a Modern product that inserts new cards without going through Standard for a while. Given the fact that Mark Rosewater, someone who's shown very little interest in reprint-only products, is hyping this up and it's a product he himself proposed, I can't imagine it's reprint-only.
 

ZealousD

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,303
They've been hinting at a Modern product that inserts new cards without going through Standard for a while. Given the fact that Mark Rosewater, someone who's shown very little interest in reprint-only products, is hyping this up and it's a product he himself proposed, I can't imagine it's reprint-only.

I don't think "experimental product" and "print directly into modern" go together all that well. Designing a card to go specifically into a "directly into Modern" set means the cards have to be designed in such a way that's it's powerful enough to see play in an eternal format without warping the format. And to do so with experiemental designs? Risky as all hell. Especially when you don't have a Play Design team available that can adequately test a format as big and complex as Modern.

I don't think the set will be reprint-only but I can't see how you call a set "Modern" without reprints at all.
 

ZealousD

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,303
Oh, I didn't mean to imply there wouldn't be reprints.

Sorry, I don't think you did. I think I just misread you.

Here's what we know so far.

1.) It's an innovation set.
2.) It will "impact" Modern. (Whatever that means.)
3.) It's called "Modern Horizons" and will presumably cost more than a normal booster product.
4.) It's not a "Masters" set.
5.) MaRo thinks there will be near-unanimous consent that this will be an exciting product.

Personally, I have no idea how all five of these elements fit together to create a single product. Maybe I don't have the necessary imagination. Maybe MaRo is wrong about what he expects our response to be. The more I think about it the more problematic a set designed to be printed directly into Modern while skipping Standard seems, so I'm skeptical about that direction. My best guess is that it's some kind of Battlebond/Conspiracy-type set with a unique format while also containing a significant amount of Modern reprints.
 

Bigkrev

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,314
LOL "MTGO Booster will be $7"
They can't tell us the price for Paper anymore. So is this a $10 booster?
 

Beje

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,751
Yeah, not paying twice as much for cardboard just because you might get a reprinted card that could or could not even be expensive right now. Fuck that noise, I'm out.
 

ZealousD

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,303
Yeah, not paying twice as much for cardboard just because you might get a reprinted card that could or could not even be expensive right now. Fuck that noise, I'm out.

Since the set is including a bunch of new, pushed cards for Modern, the expensive cards are going to be in the new cards. Not the reprints.
 

Beje

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,751
Since the set is including a bunch of new, pushed cards for Modern, the expensive cards are going to be in the new cards. Not the reprints.

Is the ink twice as expensive? Maybe a new paper pulp madre from a premium base? Last time I checked 15 cardboard cards are 15 cardboard cards. In Masters sets the pricing was still very gross but you were at least guaranteed a expensive rare/mythic since they were 100% reprints and they knew what actually played staples they were getting in there, but we still don't know where will the new cards sit in the Modern metagame and if they will be worth anything at all or just be 0.50€ bulk rares
 

ZealousD

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,303
I don't like paying more but it's extremely likely that there will be enough cards in this set that see play in Modern that the value of the set is going to stick more than a Standard set would. Also this will have a lower print run than a Standard set which will also push prices up since the cards in this set are unlikely to get reprinted any time soon.
 

Hero

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,783
Oh my god, this looks so cool. Serra had one of the coolest stories and cards for me back in the day. I will need a foil one.
 
OP
OP
SigmasonicX

SigmasonicX

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,499
theoreticalspace asked: Can you explain to someone who doesn't play modern what's so innovative and exciting about modern horizons? Not trying to be adversary, just curious as a non modern player;
I think the best way to explain why this set is applicable to more than just Modern players is to go back to where the set began. When Ethan and I first pitched this set in the Hackathon, here's what we said, "One of the cool things about a supplemental set is that we can focus on ideas that we're unwilling to do in a Standard-legal set. What if we took off the shackles and just made a set full of cards that we know players would love, but are hard to do with all the limitations that come with a normal Magic set. What if we dove deep into the creative and mechanical elements of Magic's twenty-five year history and just had a blast designing cards? We could make something really awesome." It took us the week of the Hackathon to put together our proof of concept, but once everyone saw it, we were given the green light. And then we had a lot of fun making a very interesting set. You don't have to be a Modern player to love Modern Horizons just a Magic player.

February 28, 2019
 

onpoint

Neon Deity Games
Verified
Oct 26, 2017
14,957
716
I'm curious about what this means for Modern as a format. I feel like they've done a pretty awful job shaping and cultivating the metagame via bans and printed answers if I'm being 100% honest. Maybe this set will be the start of them taking it seriously.

Would also love a Legacy Horizons as well... but I guess we gotta walk before we run.
 

jph139

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,378
I have a suspicion that introducing a product that contains cards designed specifically for Modern, en masse, is going to be a net negative in the same way introducing EDH-centric cards has been a net negative for EDH.

But I don't play Modern so what do I know.
 

WEGGLES

Member
Oct 30, 2017
290
I'm curious about what this means for Modern as a format. I feel like they've done a pretty awful job shaping and cultivating the metagame via bans and printed answers if I'm being 100% honest. Maybe this set will be the start of them taking it seriously.

Would also love a Legacy Horizons as well... but I guess we gotta walk before we run.

Cut to the chase. Give us reserve list horizons where everything is printed straight into the reserve list. Wait...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.