Fairly obvious we will, their mobile strategy seems to be release a mobile game for a franchise they are going to be releasing a Switch game for. Since we have a mobile Mario Kart game due next year, a Switch game should follow.
The Mario Kart team developed ARMS as the new game which just hit last year.Mario Kart 9 will happen for sure. The reason they released MK8Deluxe was just to pad out the Switch's first year with WiiU ports in order to avoid early console lifespan drought. I'm sure since the release of Mario Kart 8 a part of the team has been working on 9 which we'll see sometime this generation.
What? The gap from GC and Wii U is massive, and the Switch in handheld mode is only slightly more powerful than the Wii U, as you can see MK8 performs about the same on handheld and Wii U. It's also 1080p 60fps docked so I don't see what they could do to make a big enough difference without compromising resolution or performance.
Edit: not sure what Splatoon 2 has to do with it, if anything a similar situation would be not getting a Slatoon 3 on Switch, which I also think is not gonna happen
I meant GC-->Wii, not Wii U.What? The gap from GC and Wii U is massive, and the Switch in handheld mode is only slightly more powerful than the Wii U, as you can see MK8 performs about the same on handheld and Wii U. It's also 1080p 60fps docked so I don't see what they could do to make a big enough difference without compromising resolution or performance.
Edit: not sure what Splatoon 2 has to do with it, if anything a similar situation would be not getting a Slatoon 3 on Switch, which I also think is not gonna happen
So? Those are different platforms. It's a completely different matter. The point is there's nothing they could do with a new entry that they couldn't do with DLC. And it would split the userbase, and a bunch of other negative effects. Also you keep forgetting that the difference in power is very negligible in undocked modeI meant GC-->Wii, not Wii U.
You complained that there wouldn't be enough graphical improvements between mk8 deluxe and mk8 on the switch.. I said the gap between wii u and switch is wider than GC and Wii from a GPU perspective. Also I brought up Splatoon 2, because its a switch game and its a sequel to a wii u game, and graphics isn't the end it be all to justify if sequels should come or not. 2 literally came out two years after the first game, while the gap between mk8 on wii u and its future successor(hell even the port that's out now) is a lot wider in release. While deluxe does use more than 2x its processing power for 1080p, MK8 isn't even fully optimized on the console(isn't built from the ground up).r
I don't think splitting the userbase is a consideration Nintendo has with the Mario Kart series, to be perfectly honest. The userbase has always been split across the handheld and console versions, and the userbase for 8 is split across two platforms with no intercompatibility.So? Those are different platforms. It's a completely different matter. The point is there's nothing they could do with a new entry that they couldn't do with DLC. And it would split the userbase, and a bunch of other negative effects. Also you keep forgetting that the difference in power is very negligible in undocked mode
So? Those are different platforms. It's a completely different matter. The point is there's nothing they could do with a new entry that they couldn't do with DLC. And it would split the userbase, and a bunch of other negative effects. Also you keep forgetting that the difference in power is very negligible in undocked mode
I mean sure, but we're talking about the same platform this time. There would be consumers looking at both MK8DX and MK9 on Switch and possibly still choose the former for a variety of reasons, it's not reasonable to me.I don't think splitting the userbase is a consideration Nintendo has with the Mario Kart series, to be perfectly honest. The userbase has always been split across the handheld and console versions, and the userbase for 8 is split across two platforms with no intercompatibility.
That's one of the reasons I'm not so sure it will happen, yes, but at the same time, if the Switch is to last, say, 7 years, then are we saying the next Mario Kart game won't come out till 2024 at the earliest? 10 years between Mario Kart games?I mean sure, but we're talking about the same platform this time. There would be consumers looking at both MK8DX and MK9 on Switch and possibly still choose the former for a variety of reasons, it's not reasonable to me.
I mean sure, but we're talking about the same platform this time. There would be consumers looking at both MK8DX and MK9 on Switch and possibly still choose the former for a variety of reasons, it's not reasonable to me.
I feel this way about MK8Deluxe too, it's like they had take all the good decisions in the franchise and created the ultimate MK experience, good luck trying to top the game.The point is there's nothing they could do with a new entry that they couldn't do with DLC.
The difference is once you buy the DLC, you get all the content on the same game and can enjoy it with the full userbase. If you have to buy another game, you won't be able to make use of the old game's content in the switch (sorry for the pun) to the new userbase.Doesn't DLC split the userbase in an even more readily apparent manner?
Let's not pretend that Mario Kart 9 wouldn't have a very robust userbase of millions of players from the very beginning.
That could mean extended support with DLC effectively making MK a GAaS for the diration of the Switch's life, or it could mean they would still support the Switch for a while after the successor is released, much like with the 3DS, and the new game would land on the successor instead without waiting such a long timeThat's one of the reasons I'm not so sure it will happen, yes, but at the same time, if the Switch is to last, say, 7 years, then are we saying the next Mario Kart game won't come out till 2024 at the earliest? 10 years between Mario Kart games?