Both Deadpools made $800 million at the box office, I wouldn't worry
Anyway I've maintained that we would see Deadpool before X-Men or Fantastic Four
Both Deadpools made $800 million at the box office, I wouldn't worry
But then they wouldn't be able to put it on Disney+ with their other MCU films!
But then they wouldn't be able to put it on Disney+ with their other MCU films!
It's so easy, just release it under the Marvel Knights or Marvel MAX banner.
But then they wouldn't be able to put it on Disney+ with their other MCU films!
This is the easy solution. No need to release it under the Fox banner. Create a Marvel Knights or Marvel MAX banner for R rated movies and that's it.
I do feel they will have a PG-13 cut of the R rated movies for 1) China, 2) Possible re-release in the US, and 3) Disney+ release even though the R rated version would be released on Hulu.
Using Reynolds' Deadpool in PG-13 and R-rated movies concurrently would very likely open Disney up to allegations that they're marketing R-rated movies to kids. I'm not saying that'll end up dictating their strategy, they may well decide that they can afford to ignore any such backlash and that it won't amount to that much in 2022 or whenever, but I dunno if it's something they can avoid entirely if they want to go down that road, and I can see why Disney might be sensitive about that.
In the words of our Lord and savior Kevin Feige "it's going to be PG-13 and you're gonna like it" :P
Makes sense. Have Jane's exposure to the Reality Stone in The Dark World as the cause of her cancer.
I'm hoping that's what happens
Makes sense. Have Jane's exposure to the Reality Stone in The Dark World as the cause of her cancer.
I think she's definetly going to be the focus of the movie, so I'm looking forward to how endearing can Taika make her character.It makes enough sense, though I dunno if I want to see that. Mainly because we haven't seen her character in forever (and as such don't really care about her,), so my initial thought is that it'd feel cheap.
But I guess they need a decent reason for Thor to go check on her again, so meh, I dunno. Will be interesting to see what Taika decides.
for some reason, I kinda assume it will be alternate universe Jane Thor with Mjolnir coming to our universe, so there will be 2 Jane at some point, the alternate one had cancer and die at the end of the movie passing mjolnir to our Jane. because during the announcement Taika present Natalie Portman with Mjolnir suggesting that Jane Thor will use Mjolnir and we know Mjolnir is destroyed in out timelineIt makes enough sense, though I dunno if I want to see that. Mainly because we haven't seen her character in forever (and as such don't really care about her,), so my initial thought is that it'd feel cheap.
But I guess they need a decent reason for Thor to go check on her again, so meh, I dunno. Will be interesting to see what Taika decides.
Meh.In the words of our Lord and savior Kevin Feige "it's going to be PG-13 and you're gonna like it" :P
Those are also my thoughts in regard of a potential future Deadpool movie being R-rated or not :P
Isn't it just more cursing and gore what makes it R? I've yet to see the PG13 Deadpool 2 but I wonder how different it really was.I'd have zero issues with PG13 Deadpool. I didn't find the R-rated stuff that funny or interesting.
Isn't it just more cursing and gore what makes it R? I've yet to see the PG13 Deadpool 2 but I wonder how different it really was.
Especially if he breaks the 4th wall about being bleeped. XDI'm not sure about the criteria but I think Deadpool getting bleeped every time he tries to swear would be funnier than him actually swearing.
Using Reynolds' Deadpool in PG-13 and R-rated movies concurrently would very likely open Disney up to allegations that they're marketing R-rated movies to kids. I'm not saying that'll end up dictating their strategy, they may well decide that they can afford to ignore any such backlash and that it won't amount to that much in 2022 or whenever, but I dunno if it's something they can avoid entirely if they want to go down that road, and I can see why Disney might be sensitive about that.
X-Men wasn't owned by Disney before, and Fox clearly didn't care, so I'd presume people have "higher expectations" from Disney or something like that. Le sigh.I dont see why that matters . The xmen series jumped between pg13 and R, and it never became an issue.
X-Men wasn't owned by Disney before, and Fox clearly didn't care, so I'd presume people have "higher expectations" from Disney or something like that. Le sigh.
I would really like to think so too but I'd have to chalk it up to the bare minimum thought put into the general public not being able to discern the difference.Maybe... But I just don't understand why the public expectation would be that a character can't exist in both pg13 and R rated movies..
So long as marketing is on appropriate channels and it's made clear what type of content will be in each film, history suggests audiences will be able to figure it out.
It makes enough sense, though I dunno if I want to see that. Mainly because we haven't seen her character in forever (and as such don't really care about her,), so my initial thought is that it'd feel cheap.
But I guess they need a decent reason for Thor to go check on her again, so meh, I dunno. Will be interesting to see what Taika decides.
Reports are saying he's the #2 guy nowI was hoping this meant Perlmutter would be out but he's not. :(