That definitely makes the most sense, as the film specifically mentions alternate timelines and that it's impossible to alter your current timeline by changing the past."The way that it would work is that when Captain America goes back, he would create a branch reality," Joe explains. "Now he would exist in that branch reality with a second Captain America who was frozen in ice."
"Peggy understood that he was dead at that point in the storytelling because Cap went back to a point in time where nobody knew he still was alive, frozen in ice," Anthony added before Joe chimed in to hint at at one more story featuring the hero.
"Now what's also a story for another time is, of course, if he created a branch reality, he would then have to use a Pym Particle to come back to this reality to hand that shield off."
He becomes Hydra Cap.
The Russos reveal what happened to Cap at the end of Endgame:
That definitely makes the most sense, as the film specifically mentions alternate timelines and that it's impossible to alter your current timeline by changing the past.
Question is, what happens when the Cap from the alternate timeline wakes up and finds that Peggy is married to the other Cap?
He's contract isn't over until Spider-Man 3. So there are still a couple years to worry about that.It’s not really a spoiler and but is this the first time that marvel acknowledges that spider-man would lead the avengers in phase four? I was always a bit concerned what would happen once holland’s Deal was up.
One last future question. There is a rumor that Killmonger will be returning for Black Panther 2. Any truth to that?
KF: Pure rumor. The honest answer to that is that is pure rumor and speculation, because Mr. Coogler is just only in recent weeks sitting down at his keyboard and beginning to outline the movie. It’s early, so nothing is set yet in any way that far, because Mr. Coogler is sitting down and will share it with Nate Moore and myself in coming weeks.
There's a tribute to Stan Lee which is pretty nice. Then a little recording of Anthony Russo presenting the following unfinished cut scene with the Hulk. And then finishing off with the opening scene from Spider-Man: Far From Home.Seeing the Avengers Endgame fan thing tonight.
Is it a new scene and a new post-credits preview for Spider-Man? Seeing that on Wednesday anyway.
If its 10 years he probably will be leading them by then. Tom Holland's gonna be like 30 somethingNah, I think spidey will be featured prominently in mcu for the next 10(?) years but he is too young and inexperienced to lead the avengers.
Huh, if he's only now just starting to break the story, maybe 2021 is too soon for a release?BET talks to Feige about the MCU.
He says this in regards to Black Panther 2:
It was never my impression he had started work on Black Panther 2. February 2022 is much more realistic if you ask me.Huh, if he's only now just starting to break the story, maybe 2021 is too soon for a release?
I think Phase 1 and Phase 2 ruined people’s expectations for superheroe movies releases since all the movies came out in such short times you were seeing a lot of the same characters every year or so.Huh, if he's only now just starting to break the story, maybe 2021 is too soon for a release?
I guess I imagined that at least some early story stuff was done around the time Coogler's re-hiring was announced, and assumed they'd be aiming for 2021 as letting four years go by after the first BP was such a massive success seemed strange to me. I agree though if that they've only just started writing now, May 2021 seems too early.It was never my impression he had started work on Black Panther 2. February 2022 is much more realistic if you ask me.
And hopefully Feige and co give all of the visual studios more than 6 weeks to work on the effects this time.
Aquaman 2 I could understand, given how VFX heavy the first movie was and James Wan doing other things in between.It’s the same reason why people are surprised that aquaman 2 won’t be till 2022.
Marvel Studios is never included in that announcement. That's the comic/games/TV announcement. The Marvel Studios panel is just listed on the schedule when CCI posts the full show schedule.Marvel Entertainment Unveils 2019 San Diego Comic-Con Line-Up!
Note: Marvel Studios yet to announce their line up!
"It all depends. The technical answer is it all depends on what Marvel and James Gunn desire to do with the Guardians and with Gamora's fate," Saldana said. "I would eventually, there's a part of me that wants her to go back, find her way back to the Guardians but there's also a part of me that wants to explore a bad Gamora. I've never seen that and she's, you know, she's considered the most lethal assassin, the most lethal woman in the galaxy so I would want to see what that wrath looks like also because it would just give me layers to sort of work on. But yeah, I want her to get back to the Guardians."
Marvel Studios isn't part of Marvel Entertainment, so that's probably why.Marvel Entertainment Unveils 2019 San Diego Comic-Con Line-Up!
Note: Marvel Studios yet to announce their line up!
The Russos reveal what happened to Cap at the end of Endgame:
That definitely makes the most sense, as the film specifically mentions alternate timelines and that it's impossible to alter your current timeline by changing the past.
Question is, what happens when the Cap from the alternate timeline wakes up and finds that Peggy is married to the other Cap?
LULz.
Marvel Studios is never included in that announcement. That's the comic/games/TV announcement. The Marvel Studios panel is just listed on the schedule when CCI posts the full show schedule.
Didn't know this, so thanks! How does the event work? Will it be live-stream like e3 or a closed-door conference?Marvel Studios isn't part of Marvel Entertainment, so that's probably why.
I'd imagine that Cable could also be safe casting-wise of the Fox characters, though obviously Ryan Reynolds is the safest in terms of dodging the recasting bullet.
Josh Brolin is talking with Marvel Studios about Cable in the MCU.
I would think so too however, did Feige have anything to do with casting or approval in Fox movies? Did he ever say he liked those actors for the parts?I'd imagine that Cable could also be safe casting-wise of the Fox characters, though obviously Ryan Reynolds is the safest in terms of dodging the recasting bullet.
No live stream. People fight for badges and spend thousands of dollars to travel to SDCC every year and they camp out on the sidewalk for a week to see the Hall H stuff. They'd riot if there was a live stream for everyone.Didn't know this, so thanks! How does the event work? Will it be live-stream like e3 or a closed-door conference?
I'm not sure Marvel had any say in that. When NK did the Sony leaks they blew off all his ideas for the Amazing Spiderman films, for example.I would think so too however, did Feige have anything to do with casting or approval in Fox movies? Did he ever say he liked those actors for the parts?
Because EDM/Snapchat Spider-Man was going to be a huge hit!!!I'm not sure Marvel had any say in that. When NK did the Sony leaks they blew off all his ideas for the Amazing Spiderman films, for example.
Oh is there.Man I just saw the latest trailer and man... Sony doesn't leave much to the imagination. Please tell me There are still some surprises to be had,
Buy a ticket.Man I just saw the latest trailer and man... Sony doesn't leave much to the imagination. Please tell me There are still some surprises to be had,
OK good
Oh, I intend to see it either way... I'm just quite surprised at how revealing the trailers have been.Buy a ticket.
Watch the film.
Or don't. Nobody is forcing anybody to watch a film. It's okay to not watch a film. I do this all the time. It's hilarious how many films I haven't watched in my very, very long life. You can always go back.
Maybe they were confident that the film would be interesting. Showing people about how interesting your film is, that used to be the whole point of marketing a film. Did something change?Oh, I intend to see it either way... I'm just quite surprised at how revealing the trailers have been.
If feel like the opposite is true. When studios are confident they tend to hold onto the surprises so people will be blown away in the theater.Maybe they were confident that the film would be interesting. Showing people about how interesting your film is, that used to be the whole point of marketing a film. Did something change?
Well, you just overturned about 2500 years of theatre. I have to hand it to you, well done.Often, when marketing is really spoilery, it's a sign that the film won't have much more interesting content left to show.
Man, your really snarky.I'm really unsure why this struck a nerve.Well, you just overturned about 2500 years of theatre. I have to hand it to you, well done.
In case you didn't notice, I'm drowning your argument in sarcasm.
I'm old enough to recall when film studios were really keen to let you know all about the film they wanted you to see. Why wouldn't they? After all, they wanted to persuade you to watch the film. Nowadays the studios are so coy that I sometimes enter the cinema with no clear idea of what to expect. It's frustrating and completely unnecessary.If you think spoiling movies is typical marketing from a confident studio, then I don't know what to tell you... I'm done with the topic. Good day...
Letting people know enough about the preemie to gain an interest and blowing major developments in marketing material are two different things...I'm old enough to recall when film studios were really keen to let you know all about the film they wanted you to see. Why wouldn't they? After all, they wanted to persuade you to watch the film. Nowadays the studios are so coy that I sometimes enter the cinema with no clear idea of what to expect. It's frustrating and completely unnecessary.
3D IMAX was absolutely with it.Preparing to watch Spider-Man: Homecoming now. I’m traveling tomorrow after work so I catch Spider-Man: Far From Home both in Real D and IMAX.
I always watch with 3D IMAX, I will try to catch a 2D screening before I go home as well.