More and more people are teasing that it's over. Please, be true.
Link me
More and more people are teasing that it's over. Please, be true.
Can you post some tweets? I've only seen that James Oliver(sp?) guy saying it's over.More and more people are teasing that it's over. Please, be true.
eh, I believe they'll reach a compromise, and probably within the next few months, but I have a hard time believing they'd resolve the impasse in time for D23
Can you post some tweets? I've only seen that James Oliver(sp?) guy saying it's over.
Poor Leto lol.Sony called up Marvel and said "aight we'll cancel Morbius."
...
"Deal."
It is understandable that Marvel and Feige would want to keep things going with Watts: Feige has a strong track record of helping to change the career trajectory of filmmakers who wouldn't have been automatic choices for mega-budget superhero films, from Joe & Anthony Russo to Taika Waititi, James Gunn and Scott Derrickson. As for one-upsmanship, there are bruised feelings between those studios over the Rashomon-like press narratives that followed Deadline's scoop, over who did what in dismantling a brilliantly orchestrated introduction of a hit superhero franchise. It has gotten so bad that some wonder if it would even be possible for them to rethink things and come to terms on Spider-Man.
On those talks that Deadline revealed Tuesday: I continue to hear from reliable sources that the notion Feige was too busy to do more Spider-Man films just doesn't hold water; he loves the character and the way those movies served the fans and the Marvel Universe. I continue to hear that Disney asked for a 25% stake where it would finance that much of the movie and receive that much of the equity upside. This arrangement would only have been for any pictures that involved Marvel & Feige. It wasn't a forever deal, like the time one Sony made years ago to continue as distributor of James Bond. Back then, Sony cut MGM into a co-financing relationship on the pictures The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and 21 Jump Street, that gave MGM rights to co-finance future installments. The Spider-Man deal was only for pictures where Marvel lent Feige and the weight of its brand and cross pollination in Marvel movies. Still, it was a big ask of Sony, which had been getting a relative bargain at 5% of first dollar gross. That 25% offer sat for months, and finally Disney raised the ask to the 50% co-fi stake, likely knowing a divorce was coming.
new Deadline article, doesn't sound good, sky is falling, everyone panic, etc.
Those people aren't insiders and even 'real' insiders have no credibility on any of this. Negotiations between Marvel and Sony lingering on for months, but how many Twitter insides ever had anything to say about it? Then the story breaks this week and suddenly a dozen different Twitter randos have the inside scoop on what's been going on in these meetings? The bullshit is so transparent.
Those people aren't insiders and even 'real' insiders have no credibility on any of this. Negotiations between Marvel and Sony lingering on for months, but how many Twitter insides ever had anything to say about it? Then the story breaks this week and suddenly a dozen different Twitter randos have the inside scoop on what's been going on in these meetings? The bullshit is so transparent.
It's almost as if no one has a clue except the people at Disney and Sony.err... so now the story is Disney start at 25% and later up to 50% when they feel it's not going to work (why would they do that) instead of starting at 50% before dropping to 30 or 25%
the story keep changing every time an article is coming out
Over as in a deal has been made?More and more people are teasing that it's over. Please, be true.
It's over, I'm really not getting a feeling they're gonna reach common ground
that's not what they seem to be teasing, not that it matters much either way
that's not what they seem to be teasing, not that it matters much either way
Agreed, hopefully she'll get a movie at some point.I hope Ms. Marvel eventually gets a movie. For now, taking solace that it being Disney+ means she doesn't have to go through the shit the Netflix heroes and AoS had to
Pour one out for our boys Matt and Wilson.I hope Ms. Marvel eventually gets a movie. For now, taking solace that it being Disney+ means she doesn't have to go through the shit the Netflix heroes and AoS had to
I hope Ms. Marvel eventually gets a movie. For now, taking solace that it being Disney+ means she doesn't have to go through the shit the Netflix heroes and AoS had to
would be funny in a cruel-joke sort of way if THR misreported it and this show is actually from Marvel Television, though Feige has said he wants to use the character so I doubt that's the case
Again, i'm contesting you saying that Jumanji is a successful franchise when it has yet to have multiple successful films this decade. Everyone thought Secret Life of Pets was going to be a successful franchise until the sequel made less than half of what the original did. A single successful film does not make a franchise.
Because people feel like she is "relegated." I was afraid this was gonna be the new norm as soon as they expanded to Disney+ shows.
Maybe they wanted 25% of the spinoffs too and Sony wasn't willing to give that up? I don't know, this whole ordeal is pretty confusing.Something is off with all of these reports.
So now they are saying that Disney offered 25% as their initial offer? And that was just for the movies they produced, not equity in the license/franchise? And then they went up to 50% because Sony wasn't accepting 25%, hummm what?
And to make things look even more off.....the other report was saying Rothman was willing to give up 25%.
So if Disney wanted 25% for just the films they produced and for the duration of the contract and if Rothman was willing to give up 25% presumably for the same.....then what's the issue?
Besides the fact they are not seeing eye to eye and are going their separate ways I am taking all these reports with a HUGE grain of salt.
Maybe they wanted 25% of the spinoffs too and Sony wasn't willing to give that up? I don't know, this whole ordeal is pretty confusing.
The Deadline article said Disney's offer stood for "half a year". That implies that Disney asked for the 25% deal way before Far From Home. Then the movie released and totally blew passed everyone's expectations, most likely changing Disney's attitude about the deal and feeling they were now entitled for more if this was the kind of numbers Spidey was gonna start pulling.Something is off with all of these reports.
So now they are saying that Disney offered 25% as their initial offer? And that was just for the movies they produced, not equity in the license/franchise? And then they went up to 50% because Sony wasn't accepting 25%, hummm what?
And to make things look even more off.....the other report was saying Rothman was willing to give up 25%.
So if Disney wanted 25% for just the films they produced and for the duration of the contract and if Rothman was willing to give up 25% presumably for the same.....then what's the issue?
Besides the fact they are not seeing eye to eye and are going their separate ways I am taking all these reports with a HUGE grain of salt.