How is it not? You're literally saying it's ok for one game to be exclusive while the other shouldn't. It's not like I'm accusing you of something out of nowhere. It's the same tired arguments console warriors use.It's not console warrior shit. Stop that idiotic mudslinging nonsense right now. I'm arguing that a game that historically was multiplat should remain so, while you're in favor of it going console exclusive. If anyone is fighting the good ol' console warrior fight it's you smfh
That is a possibility but I think Nintendo approached them. I'm simply saying the thought that this wouldn't happen without Nintendo is nonsense.
I don't, but it is a fan favorite franchise that was multiplat before with demand for it's continuation so it happening wasn't some matter of Nintendo swooping down to save the day. They may've pitched it but it's unlikely Marvel/Disney weren't aware of it's demand or needed them to get anything done. Let's be real here, Marvel/Disney holds the cards in this situation.
It's not console warrior shit. Stop that idiotic mudslinging nonsense right now. I'm arguing that a game that historically was multiplat should remain so, while you're in favor of it going console exclusive. If anyone is fighting the good ol' console warrior fight it's you smfh
Pretty sure Activision lost the right to Marvel stuff not super long ago.How is Activision not involved? Did Disney somehow end up with full ownership of the name?
I honestly thought the game looked nice when I saw it; so it was weird going into the thread and feeling so much black lash. It's not stunning or anything, but it serves this style of game well, at least in my opinion.
That is a possibility but I think Nintendo approached them. I'm simply saying the thought that this wouldn't happen without Nintendo is nonsense.
???Agreed :/. This is like if Final Fantasy went back to being a Playstation exclusive.
It dont get this comments like its look terrible or like ass, IMO it looks OK, I like art style.
The cheesy voice acting is part of what makes those games memorable for meSo I'm not really a fan of the art style that they went with but all of the people saying the previous 2 looked better need to take your nostalgia glasses off and go ahead and play them again because they look awful (and the voice acting, holy shit). I loved the first two but going back to them recently made me shutter a bit. They aren't what I'd remembered so fondly. I'm hopeful for this game. I was very surprised to see the Nintendo Switch exclusive but I'm not mad. This is why I have all consoles.
Is this game being developed by the same group that made Hyrule Warriors? Cause I didn't like those games.
The ones who made NiohIs this game being developed by the same group that made Hyrule Warriors? Cause I didn't like those games.
How is it not? You're literally saying it's ok for one game to be exclusive while the other shouldn't. It's not like I'm accusing you of something out of nowhere. It's the same tired arguments console warriors use.
It's quite possible Nintendo approached them with a strong proposal, yes. If that's the case, Marvel must have been pretty impressed, since they could have easily made this a multiplatform release.
Though Marvel seems to be getting pretty aggressive on the games side of things, so I wouldn't be surprised at all if this was their idea from the outset.
Would it honestly make you feel better if Nintendo/Marvel came out and said that the game wouldn't exist if Nintendo didn't step up and fund it (ala SFV), even if that weren't necessarily true? It feels sometimes that the lessons these big companies could take from the way some fans react to things is basically "Get better at bullshitting us".
Dude, you're port-begging like a PS4 owner that just found out Bayonetta 2 was a Wii U exclusive.No, I'm reasoning why a game that was ALWAYS multiplat should REMAIN multiplat while also saying I understand why a game with two companies with a good and longstanding relationship based off the license of that character in the very first game of it's series is exclusive and less bothersome.
There was nothing at all in my statements to suggest I was console warring and you and anyone with fair reasoning knows it. I have no issue if you disagree with my thoughts and want to debate why you feel how you do on things but don't assign shit to me just because I don't jive with yours and I'll show you the same respect.
Yeah, it's definitely a possibility so I can't claim to know why they did it or who approached who but my feelings on it is just based off the series always being multiplat and suddenly it's not. I think it's a bit of a slap to the face of longtime fans (like myself) who are now shafted if we don't have a Switch, which sadly I don't yet. I'm not mad at this, just annoyed honestly and that's probably because I'll end up owning the system sooner than later anyway.
No, I'd feel they not only annoyed me by making a traditionally multiplat game exclusive but they're playing on my intelligence to lie as if the game wouldn't happen otherwise. Don't even get me started on SFV. That still bothers me to this day.
My last post on this btw since apparently I was warned for "port begging" even though I wasn't doing that at all smh
Is this game being developed by the same group that made Hyrule Warriors? Cause I didn't like those games.
Nintendo is publishing, and probably footing the bill. It's not all that different from Spiderman on PS4, and that game isn't third party.
Hell are Smash Bros and Hyrule Warriors third party?
Smash and Hyrule Warriors are totally different things, those are Nintendo IPs and Nintendo is involved in development of those games, while this game is 3rd party IP and made only buy 3rd party teams, point that Nintendo publishing it don't change that.
Games like Octopath Traveler, Daemon X Machina and Bayonetta 3 are all also 3rd party exclusives for Switch.
There were hand ninja in the trailer, where they pop up Daredevil and iron fist follow. I too hope for the return of moon knight. Also if we've got Crystal and Lockjaw we're at least getting Black Bolt tooLooks awesome to me. I hope that shot at the end isn't the full roster though. I want other X-Men, Daredevil, Moon Knight, Iron Fist, Blade, Jessica Jones, etc...
Smash and Hyrule Warriors are totally different things, those are Nintendo IPs and Nintendo is involved in development of those games, while this game is 3rd party IP and made only buy 3rd party teams, point that Nintendo publishing it don't change that.
Games like Octopath Traveler, Daemon X Machina and Bayonetta 3 are all also 3rd party exclusives for Switch.
When it comes to first/third party, who is publishing is the only thing that matters.
Dude, you're port-begging like a PS4 owner that just found out Bayonetta 2 was a Wii U exclusive.
It's not a third party IP if Nintendo is publishing. Again, is Spiderman a third party PS4 game?
When it comes to first/third party, who is publishing is the only thing that matters.
That's exactly why the term 2nd party had it's right to exist.
Its 3rd party IP develped buy 3rd party studio, point that Nintendo is publishing it dont change nothing, games like Octopath Traveler, Daemon X Machina, Bayonetta 3 and this game, cant be 1st party games in any case.
It didn't because 2nd parties don't publish games. First/Third party refers to publishers, and there is no such thing as a second party publisher.