Maybe it's just me, but going over 1080p doesn't seem worth it.

[Guaraná]

as long as I can play in 60fps, the more resolution, the better.

 

[Wet Jimmy]

people can say that the game is charming and all, but the game is one of the worst examples of non native resolution out there this gen. On the 7" screen it looks so jaggy. and im not that bothered by that in most games. (But this and kirbys 30 fps are just to hard to swallow, both worse then the slowdowns in Links Awakening, since they go away after a second)

Click to shrink...

You're not wrong. But Nintendo seems to get a pass for dragging the technological chain.... still, if the target audience laps it up, no surprise why.

 

[Aether]

You're not wrong. But Nintendo seems to get a pass for dragging the technological chain.... still, if the target audience laps it up, no surprise why.

Click to shrink...

Yeah, probably the games didn't have a loong time in development, and at the same time the team had to learn a new engine (UE4), since there is no way switch could not handle these games better. (and if some effects are to brutal for switch, this would be THE example of focus on the wrong graphical elements...)

 

[DiK4]

1080p is good enough for me.

 

[Rivyn]

I am fine with 1080p.

In all honestly I want developers to focus on 60fps and better draw distance, shadows and AA implementation.

Rarely do I have the feeling that 4k is worth it.

 

[Łazy]

Same for me.
I don't have much to say about it because 720p is already quite clean vs non HD, so 1080 is perfect.
Clearly not what I'm looking for in a game.