Merkel Reverses Long-Held Stance on Asylum Seekers in Bid to Save Her Government

YawZah

Member
Oct 30, 2017
455
BERLIN — Chancellor Angela Merkel, who staked her legacy on welcoming hundreds of thousands of migrants into Germany, agreed on Monday to build camps for those seeking asylum and to tighten the border with Austria to save her government.
It was a spectacular turnabout for a leader who was once seen as the standard-bearer of the liberal European order but who has come under intense pressure at home over her migration policy.
Ms. Merkel will limp on as chancellor as a result of her move, an agreement with conservatives in her coalition government. For how long is unclear as populism and nationalism are taking root — fast — in the mainstream of German politics.
“Her political capital is depleted,” said Thomas Kleine-Brockhoff, director of the Berlin office of the German Marshall Fund and a former presidential speechwriter. “We are well into the final chapter of the Merkel era.”
But since she welcomed more than a million often undocumented migrants to Germany in 2015 and 2016, nationalism and populism have made a comeback in a country that has long tried to escape the shadows of its past. Migration has become the topic that will most define her legacy, and it has become a test for German democracy itself.
In last September’s election, Ms. Merkel’s conservatives recorded their worst postwar result. It took two tries, negotiations with six other parties, nearly six months and a lot of concessions to political rivals to form a government.

In the vote, the far-right Alternative for Germany, or AfD, emerged as the third-strongest force in the German Parliament and the main opposition party.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/02/world/europe/angela-merkel-migration-coalition.html

Update:

CDU/CSU and SPD reached an agreement and there is no mention of those camps at the border anymore, but Seehofer is still acting as if he's content. So he pulled all this shit over nothing and in the end doesn't even face any consequences.

There will also be no sending people back at the border, but instead quicker border procedures, which also doesn't need any changes in the law.

http://www.tagesschau.de/inland/einigung-asylstreit-101.html
English source
BERLIN — The parties in Germany's ruling coalition have reached an agreement in a dispute over a push by Bavarian conservatives to turn back certain migrants at the German-Austrian border, coalition sources said late on Thursday.

No details were immediately available.
https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/201...euters-europe-migrants-germany-agreement.html
 
Last edited:

Volimar

volunteer forum janitor
Member
Oct 25, 2017
21,863
With her party I guess you couldn't expect it to last forever. Once public opinion started shifting, both her days and the days of her refugee policy were numbered.
 

Muffin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,472
It should be mentioned that this isn't set in stone yet. The CDU/CSU needs to win over their coalition partner, the SPD first.

Let's hope they're not as spineless as usual.
 

Becks'

Member
Dec 7, 2017
6,266
Canada
Fucking Nazis.

EDIT: I am referring to AfD and those opposing immigrants.
 
Last edited:

NSA

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
3,317
When they let the migrants in, are they now German citizens, or do they need to be worried about getting kicked out?
 
Oct 26, 2017
15,327
This is the type of news Trump likes to here. He already has a dumb, poor base but a lot of progressive leaders around the world do not, so he can pump the rhetoric and trade wars because he and the rest of the GOP know he just has to outlast the ruling party. You can already see trends of this in Canada too.
 

Pein

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,408
NYC
Wow a million migrants? Where are they all staying? good for her for helping people out but that’s a lotta people in a small amount of time.
 

PaddingtonDidntDoIt

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
May 8, 2018
698
It's the way the world turns.
Sometimes you get good periods. Sometimes you get bad ones. We're headed into a really bad one.
 

Muffin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,472
This is literally only going to have negative effects. So asylum seekers need to stay in those centres/camps at the border until they are accepted or denied in a quick process. The goal here is mainly to not let in people who already got their asylum in other EU countries like Italy.

So what's going to happen is that Italy is just not going let these people claim asylum there, and they'll be coming here without any form of papers or identification. And Germany will have to accept the asylum claims that are legit, which will be only harder to determine.
 
Last edited:

Pokiehl

Member
Oct 29, 2017
553
Merkel seems to be dead set on clinging to power. Pretty remarkable how she keeps going.

This is the type of news Trump likes to here. He already has a dumb, poor base but a lot of progressive leaders around the world do not, so he can pump the rhetoric and trade wars because he and the rest of the GOP know he just has to outlast the ruling party. You can already see trends of this in Canada too.

Can we keep Trump out of it please. It's not necessary to relate everything to the US.
 

Vonnegut

Banned
May 27, 2018
1,082
Well, what did she expect? Why couldn’t Germany have instead invested in building infrastructure and housing in an African nation where the migrants could live? Other nations could have pitched in.
 

Muffin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,472
Why the hell are y'all keep saying migrants when the topic is mainly about asylum seekers?

Already getting some hot takes here too.
 

Deleted member 8860

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
6,525
Wow a million migrants? Where are they all staying? good for her for helping people out but that’s a lotta people in a small amount of time.


Germany has done the most in Europe to take in refugees, which is commendable, but still much less than smaller/less wealthy nations in Asia/ME/Africa (graph is a couple years old -- the numbers have gone up). The rest of Europe should step up, but alas.
 

Chamaeleonx

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,348
With Merkel being on the way out it will be interesting who emerges in the next election.

Calm down, doubt his is the right answer, especially with Germany.

With her party I guess you couldn't expect it to last forever. Once public opinion started shifting, both her days and the days of her refugee policy were numbered.
People should be able to understand it a little bit if you look at the numbers. It is always a difficult task to take so many people in and find a population to be okay with that.

When they let the migrants in, are they now German citizens, or do they need to be worried about getting kicked out?
They still have to go through the process and stuff. You can't just let everybody in because any country would collapse under the weight.
 

Deleted member 283

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,288
Well, what did she expect? Why couldn’t Germany have instead invested in building infrastructure and housing in an African nation where the migrants could live? Other nations could have pitched in.
Which nation? How do you get them to agree to that? What if none of them do? Where do they live in the mean time, while that stuff is all happening? How you getting them there? This idea has so many holes it's not even funny.
 

gutter_trash

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
17,124
Montreal
She did exaggerate in 2015 with her open arms approach. Especially considering her harshness towards smaller EU countries post-2008 crash
 

Muffin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,472
SPD apparently ended the meeting with the CDU today without agreeing to this proposition, so more talks will follow soon I guess.
 
Oct 26, 2017
13,486
Kind of off topic, but on topic...I sure wish people from these countries didn't have to flee for their lives just to keep their loved ones alive. Is the war in Syvia ever going to end in my lifetime or will it be more bloodshed and more bloodshed until I'm dead?
 

Muffin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,472
Improve the conditions in their countries of origin.

Western nations investing in those troubled countries could do more to improve the stability of those countries
That's an extremely general answer for a very specific scenario. That's what the EU should have done pre-2015, yes. The EU reaped what it sowed in 2015. But in that specific time in 2015 when a decision had to be made with asylum seekers already waiting at borders of Hungary etc., I don't see an alternative approach that could have been used.
 

Sinfamy

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,724
So she's doing what people said Germany should do from the beginning?
Building housing, camps, and investing in infrastructure instead of an open door policy that results in thousands of deaths at sea from people looking to get to Germany from Africa.

Very few people are against helping refugees and poor immigrants, you just have to do it in a way that isn't stupid and pisses off your population, and your neighboring countries when you try and force them to take people in that you invited.

With that said, it's the USA who should be funding the rebuilding of many ME nations, not Germany, but that's never going to happen with this administration.
 

Kyougar

Member
Nov 3, 2017
7,291
Anyone wanting Merkel out doesn't understand that there is no good, respected, experienced, politician out there who could stem the tide against populism or far right rhetoric.
CSU is going full steam ahead far-right and I shudder what they could do to Germany and Europe if they either put up the new Chancellor or CDU has a weak candidate. CSU is going full-Trump at the moment.
 

Chamaeleonx

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,348
AfD are a bunch of Nazis and Seehofer might as well join them at this point instead of chickening out of his resignation.
I know. But I still have hope that a new candidate can show up for the next election and right the ship a bit until the more extreme side dies down. As long as they can keep them in check everything will work out eventually as the fear will die down.

What was the alternative exactly?
The USA picking up the slack..., conveniently there is a nice big ocean between them and every other nation on this planet. I believe we had a thread before in this issues that the USA took in almost no immigrants from countries they are partially responsible for in terms of devastation.

Kind of off topic, but on topic...I sure wish people from these countries didn't have to flee for their lives just to keep their loved ones alive. Is the war in Syvia ever going to end in my lifetime or will it be more bloodshed and more bloodshed until I'm dead?
Who knows really..., all this fighting for oil, the Middle East between each other because of religion... . If everybody would smarten up then these issues would reduce themself quite a bit, but everybody wants to not concede on their arguments.
 

Muffin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,472
So she's doing what people said Germany should do from the beginning?
Building housing, camps, and investing in infrastructure instead of an open door policy that results in thousands of deaths at sea from people looking to get to Germany from Africa.

Very few people are against helping refugees and poor immigrants, you just have to do it in a way that isn't stupid and pisses off your population, and your neighboring countries when you try and force them to take people in that you invited.

With that said, it's the USA who should be funding the rebuilding of many ME nations, not Germany, but that's never going to happen with this administration.
This specific change in policy is going to do exactly nothing in terms of people coming over here with boats or not.

The EU meetings in the recent weeks were aimed at that.

Seehofer doesn't care about any of that or what those meetings achieved or not. He just wants to be able to stop people at the border of his precious Bavaria.
 
Last edited:

gutter_trash

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
17,124
Montreal
That's an extremely general answer for a very specific scenario. That's what the EU should have done pre-2015, yes. The EU reaped what it sowed in 2015. But in that specific time in 2015 when a decision had to be made with asylum seekers already waiting at borders of Hungary etc., I don't see an alternative approach that could have been used.
Pre 2015 is post 2008.
 

Chamaeleonx

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,348
So she's doing what people said Germany should do from the beginning?
Building housing, camps, and investing in infrastructure instead of an open door policy that results in thousands of deaths at sea from people looking to get to Germany from Africa.

Very few people are against helping refugees and poor immigrants, you just have to do it in a way that isn't stupid and pisses off your population, and your neighboring countries when you try and force them to take people in that you invited.

With that said, it's the USA who should be funding the rebuilding of many ME nations, not Germany, but that's never going to happen with this administration.
Doubt the USA will ever pay anything. They will continue to ignore it and point at everybody else. =/
I agree that she could have been more careful and now they finally get a bit more careful. Hopefully they find somebody for the next election to push more to the left.
 

Deleted member 11517

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,260
Can we keep Trump out of it please. It's not necessary to relate everything to the US.
Not really. These people wanting these changes are basically trumpists. You don't really need to know a whole lot to see they wouldn't exist in any noticeable way without the new direction of the US government, ie Trump.

There is a pretty clear connection, at least ideologically.

And yes, the "open arms" thing was definitely a mistake, not the idea, but the execution. Merkel had to know how most people here would likely react and about the possible consequences.
 

Muffin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,472
2015 is the year with the biggest surge of refugees and when Merkel opened her doors, despite post-2008
What does "opened her doors" mean exactly? Germanys borders weren't closed, they were open as a part of Schengen. She didn't open her borders, she refused to close them when the refugee influx got higher.
 

gutter_trash

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
17,124
Montreal
What does "opened her doors" mean exactly? Germanys borders weren't closed, they were open as a part of Schengen. She didn't open her borders, she refused to close them when the refugee influx got higher.
By advertising it more vocally .

Despite the stress Greece was getting hammered with the influx of many via the Mediterranean
 

Yoshi

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,055
Germany
Not really. These people wanting these changes are basically trumpists. You don't really need to know a whole lot to see they wouldn't exist in any noticeable way without the new direction of the US government, ie Trump.
This is completely false. US politics has not a huge influence on German politics and Trump has won the presidency end of 2016, the AfD entered the first state's parliament in 2014 and established themselves in (almost?) every election since 2015. Trump is not the reason for this. Xenophobia in Germany (as it exists in every state) is.
 

36 Chambers

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,345
This is completely false. US politics has not a huge influence on German politics and Trump has won the presidency end of 2016, the AfD entered the first state's parliament in 2014 and established themselves in (almost?) every election since 2015. Trump is not the reason for this. Xenophobia in Germany (as it exists in every state) is.
No no no no the USA is the center of the universe and everything is about Trump and he is orange turd didnt you know?