Except for those who want to play without Denuvo. E.g., me.
Well that usually ends up getting removed anyway.
Or you could just like play the game anyway with it on, but you do you.
From external googling one can learn that the Gold Edition includes the expansion pass, but there is absolutely NOTHING in the description on this page that indicates that. I know that to some extent this is on the publisher to provide that info in their description (which I've found to be hit-or-miss), but it's frustrating since I see this a lot, and Steam already has all that info in their database that they could expose in the same way they do so with bundles.
They've had 1 year + to remove it and now that the final DLC is out even more reason to do so. Game was cracked 1 month after it came out last year.
But this is era, where other people can't respect other's purchase decision in regards to a dog shit DRM that serves no puprose.
Without buying out-of-region using a VPN on the Epic store, this is the cheapest the game has been for me. The price went up $20 the moment they announced their exclusivity deal.Surprised so many waited for Steam release. Made 2nd, 3rd and 5th global top seller (standard, gold, franchise editions).
And you could play it for much cheaper before if wanted.
It's entirely on the publisher/developer. It's not Steam's fault if they aren't using packages/bundles correctly.Just a side note, Steam REALLY needs to do a better job of surfacing what the difference between different editions of games are on the storefront.
From external googling one can learn that the Gold Edition includes the expansion pass, but there is absolutely NOTHING in the description on this page that indicates that. I know that to some extent this is on the publisher to provide that info in their description (which I've found to be hit-or-miss), but it's frustrating since I see this a lot, and Steam already has all that info in their database that they could expose in the same way they do so with bundles.
Get it on Game Pass for $5 if you really want to play Metro Exodus.
Don't reward them for these exclusivity deals by giving them money as soon as it returns to Steam.
Without buying out-of-region using a VPN on the Epic store, this is the cheapest the game has been for me. The price went up $20 the moment they announced their exclusivity deal.
It's entirely on the publisher/developer. It's not Steam's fault if they aren't using packages/bundles correctly.
(I was one of those who pre-ordered right before it got pulled off Steam. In CAD, the pre-order was cheaper than EGS' discounted price, so it was a no-brainer).
They've had 1 year + to remove it and now that the final DLC is out even more reason to do so. Game was cracked 1 month after it came out last year.
But this is era, where other people can't respect other's purchase decision in regards to a dog shit DRM that serves no puprose.
I'm not sure what you mean; Steam can't magically tell what's within a subID. It might be an activation code for a helmet or a completely separate game for all they know, since they can be treated the same way in their backend.Nevertheless, it's in Valve's interest to make sure that their store listings are accurate and not misleading, and there's more they COULD do to ensure that publishers surface that information. If they're going to allow multiple purchase options that don't utilize the detailed package or bundle functionality they could at least require the publishers to disclaim what is in them. Steam KNOWS what's in that package, so it's not really even clear to me why they don't display it in all cases. Looking at the SteamDB for these two examples, it's really not even clear to me why your example lists everything explicitly while mine doesn't. Maybe there's a legitimate reason for a publisher to be able to hide that detail from a package, but it seems like it should not be the default...
Gamepass version could not enable RTX without crashing, though (at least when I tried it, it was impossible to get it to work in DX12). Hardcore PC enthusiast with an aversion to EGS will probably get it in Steam.
I'm not sure what you mean; Steam can't magically tell what's within a subID. It might be an activation code for a helmet or a completely separate game for all they know, since they can be treated the same way in their backend.
It's primarily in the publisher's interest to convey this information since they're the ones with the information in the first place.
I'd love for Valve to pressure publishers when it comes to these things, but I don't think they can do much in this specific scenario.
I get what you're saying, but I'm not convinced it's for the better across the board. Steam, as any store, wants to convey as concise and relevant information as possible; by showing a list of 20 random package names (such as Uplay activations, Deluxe activations, Map Editors, HD textures or other irrelevant packages) you're just as likely to confuse your customers more than anything else. It's just for the sake of convenience.Look at my SteamDB link though. At minimum there needs to be a name associated with an AppID; in this case, the "Metro Exodus - Gold Edition" has 4 packages associated with it. There's a clear taxonomy there. Yes, a publisher might have 20 AppIDs associated with a package with generic names, but I don't see any reason why the storefront page shouldn't at least surface those to the customer. In cases like this, everything has a perfectly reasonable name associated with it, but for whatever reason they're not displayed on the package info (as opposed to your Dishonored example where they are). The information IS there in the database, it's just a matter of exposing it to the users, and I just don't see why Valve would allow that to be optional.
Definitely. And achievements, too.There's also likely a lot of people around the world who are buying it on Steam since Valve supports far more payment methods than Epic does.
This is a really bad argument to be honest. Piracy forums are usually filled with people complaining about the lack of updates and or new content/DLC's. Just because the game was cracked around release doesn't mean there's no value in keeping the protection in there if that still means updates/dlc/expansions aren't getting cracked or at least much later.They've had 1 year + to remove it and now that the final DLC is out even more reason to do so. Game was cracked 1 month after it came out last year.
But this is era, where other people can't respect other's purchase decision in regards to a dog shit DRM that serves no puprose.
Just hours after the release the game peaked at almost 12.000 players. That's close to RDR2 launch numbers after the first day. After one year of EGS exclusivity and being free on Gamepass.
If by most you mean Era and Reddit, you're way off ...I'm not surprised at all. Most PC gamers hates EGS. I'll be more surprised if it sells well on Steam because of Gamepass.
This is pretty garbage
I bought the game on Steam before the Epic deal, so I got screwed and had to pay full price?
Not cool 4A
This is pretty garbage
I bought the game on Steam before the Epic deal, so I got screwed and had to pay full price?
Not cool 4A
Game is a year old now.This is pretty garbage
I bought the game on Steam before the Epic deal, so I got screwed and had to pay full price?
Not cool 4A
Exactly, only Nintendo games stay full priced years later. Everything else is like half priced or lower, I think some Capcom games recently went as low as $16 less than a year after release (RE2, DMC V).
sure, if you took 'pc gamers' to mean 'PCGamer' lol
Definitely buying since the GamePass version is fucking awful. Curious, would I be able to use my saves from GamePass for the Steam version?
This is pretty garbage
I bought the game on Steam before the Epic deal, so I got screwed and had to pay full price?
Not cool 4A
Definitely buying since the GamePass version is fucking awful. Curious, would I be able to use my saves from GamePass for the Steam version?
No. Games on Gamepass is still UWP. Even if you could use your save file you won't even be able to locate your folder.
no
Kind of in between, but leaning more towards Metro than open ended-ness of Stalker.Those that played this; is it proper open like a stalker game or is it more inline with earlier Metro's? I really tried enjoying those games but they were way too linear and closed off for my taste.
this is some bizarre fucking logic right here. The game was full price because it was just coming out. It was full prince on EGS as well for months. It's a year old game now.
Thanks. I'll prob skip.Kind of in between, but leaning more towards Metro than open ended-ness of Stalker.