She makes some good points here, these days people(especially Americans) can't handle each other unless their opinions align 100%.
A lot of ERA ain't just shit. I think it's time for me to start adding to my ignore list for the first time on any site ever.I believe a large portion of ERA is just very hurt and miserable.
Well, yes.I believe a large portion of ERA is just very hurt and miserable.
What does this even mean fam? If you're going to start saying that we ain't shit for gassing up Michelle Obama because she's a black woman, ignoring all other context, then what did you expect?a lot of ERA ain't shit. I think it's time for me to start adding to my ignore list for the first time on any site ever.
She makes some good points here, these days people(especially Americans) can't handle each other unless their opinions align 100%.
Comparing Boyega using clunky phrasing to Michelle defending George fucking Bush lolA lot of ERA ain't just shit. I think it's time for me to start adding to my ignore list for the first time on any site ever.
Between this thread and the Boyega thread, I'm seeing all I need to see of "progressive" Era. A lot of progressive racism is what I'm seeing.
We see you.
Within the context of what she's obviously talking about, sure.
Era extreme gonna extreme, though. Keep on attacking this amazing black woman. The rest of us see you. And don't worry about us; we're used to it.
for example. lol. we see you people.
Is Michelle Obama supposed to be above criticism because she's a black woman?
I'm just a white man, so maybe i don't get it. But as a queer person, i don't want shit people like Ellen or Dave Rubin to represent me, for example. I would imagine that my low opinion of Obama wouldn't change were i black. Especially since both of them keep putting the importance of their class and status quo above any consideration for other POC. Particularly non American ones.
A lot of ERA ain't just shit. I think it's time for me to start adding to my ignore list for the first time on any site ever.
Between this thread and the Boyega thread, I'm seeing all I need to see of "progressive" Era. A lot of progressive racism is what I'm seeing. Nuance is harder than black and white, and reality is harder than these people's cartoon-like head canon.
We see you.
For many, a lot of that hurt and misery is probably due to the conditions wrought by the Bush and Obama (and obviously Trump) presidencies.I believe a large portion of ERA is just very hurt and miserable.
A lot of ERA ain't just shit. I think it's time for me to start adding to my ignore list for the first time on any site ever.
Between this thread and the Boyega thread, I'm seeing all I need to see of "progressive" Era. A lot of progressive racism is what I'm seeing. Nuance is harder than black and white, and reality is harder than these people's cartoon-like head canon.
We see you.
She popularized "when they go low, we go high." This is her actually practicing what she preaches. She literally is forced to sit next to George Bush at every State event, so rather than be stank and throw him the finger which I assume you all want her to do, she engages him with regards to his family and found subjects with which they can speak on in a civil manner.
No lies detected.I am glad we have sorted out that criticising someone for humanising and equating her views with that of a war criminal is where progressivism stops because it happens to be a POC, when it is clear that there is one thing that trumps race and it's clearly class.
Obama and his tepid-at-best progressivism coupled with his support for staunch centrism is partially responsible for Trump, let's not forget that. And the fact that the first time Obama spoke out against someone running for President was ... for some reason against Bernie and Warren.
So yes, these are her fucking values, she's a bad person and so is her husband.
Absolutely, how can anyone convince themselves that what she's doing is "OK"?Sorry but there's no range of nuance in her phrasing that makes even slightly ok. This is just another member of the out of touch elite not understanding the actual human cost of Bush's presidency. But he's such a lovable goof and sometimes he has disagreements with us, but deep down he's a sweetie n_n
She's practising what she preaches alright. A very flawed and dangerous practise at that, but sure.She popularized "when they go low, we go high." This is her actually practicing what she preaches. She literally is forced to sit next to George Bush at every State event, so rather than be stank and throw him the finger which I assume you all want her to do, she engages him with regards to his family and found subjects with which they can speak on in a civil manner.
I mean, most people don't all over the world. This is a human issue in general, so I'm not sure why some of you always try to frame these poor generalizations as some enlightened truth or behave as if it means anything specific. Yes, a lot of people all over world are concerned with immediate matters closer to home and within their lives. This occurs in plenty of cultures and it's part of human nature, what else is new?It reminds me how little America-Era thinks about outside their country.
This isn't about thinking, everyone can think whatever they want and be free to befriend whoever they want.
This is about white-washing a war criminal, one that hasn't faced the consequence of his actions only because he was the president of the US once.
There is a huge gap about thinking something bad and actually do it, especially something as bad as lying to make a war to bomb brown innocents.
I honestly don't give a damn about who Michelle wants to be friend. I just hate how this war criminal keeps being white washed and it's not where he deserves to be: in a jail.
I'm completely baffled folks.
We've had to post Abu Ghraib, we've had to post up Obama and Bush's crimes, I had to post my identity incase others would try to dismiss me as some other "White progressive" for standing against this shit.
Absolutely baffling. Can some of you just look inwards and try to understand why there is so much anger for the Obamas? For Bush?
Or are these simply "Purity tests"?
Stop dismissing our voices as emotional babble and try to receive what we're saying for once. Stop excusing Bush's rehabilitation as some "personal relationship"..
There is no malicious intent here, so stop muddying up the waters with that nonsense.
The bad faith reads are goddamn infuriating. To try and poison the well and insinuate that there are racist undertones here.
Come on, fam..
I am glad we have sorted out that criticising someone for humanising and equating her views with that of a war criminal is where progressivism stops because it happens to be a POC, when it is clear that there is one thing that trumps race and it's clearly class.
Obama and his tepid-at-best progressivism coupled with his support for staunch centrism is partially responsible for Trump, let's not forget that. And the fact that the first time Obama spoke out against someone running for President was ... for some reason against Bernie and Warren.
So yes, these are her fucking values, she's a bad person and so is her husband.
She popularized "when they go low, we go high." This is her actually practicing what she preaches. She literally is forced to sit next to George Bush at every State event, so rather than be stank and throw him the finger which I assume you all want her to do, she engages him with regards to his family and found subjects with which they can speak on in a civil manner.
Oh most definitely. Huge portion just miserable as FUCK. It makes some threads hard as hell, but I think it's okay for people to shit on Bush II. I don't understand why Michelle Obama being friends with him bothers so many people, but to each their own.I believe a large portion of ERA is just very hurt and miserable.
I am glad we have sorted out that criticising someone for humanising and equating her views with that of a war criminal is where progressivism stops because it happens to be a POC, when it is clear that there is one thing that trumps race and it's clearly class.
Obama and his tepid-at-best progressivism coupled with his support for staunch centrism is partially responsible for Trump, let's not forget that. And the fact that the first time Obama spoke out against someone running for President was ... for some reason against Bernie and Warren.
This is in reference to drones isn't it?
To get a grip on this, to which percentage does your values, your compassion, love and solidarity with civilian brown people maimed, killed and tortured in the name of Empire intersect with Bush's? just the ballpark is enough.
Not that hard to understand, really.Oh most definitely. Huge portion just miserable as FUCK. It makes some threads hard as hell, but I think it's okay for people to shit on Bush II. I don't understand why Michelle Obama being friends with him bothers so many people, but to each their own.
I hope she's able to be civil and Christian when dealing with trump and family at state events. Hope she can always go high xD
Yeah Bush has done some horrible shit but he's also done say more than any other US president for Africa in like 50 years. To pretend like there's no nuance to the man at all is garbage.A lot of ERA ain't just shit. I think it's time for me to start adding to my ignore list for the first time on any site ever.
Between this thread and the Boyega thread, I'm seeing all I need to see of "progressive" Era. A lot of progressive racism is what I'm seeing. Nuance is harder than black and white, and reality is harder than these people's cartoon-like head canon.
We see you.
Needs a harder emphasis on "miserable".I believe a large portion of ERA is just very hurt and miserable.
What the hell is this? Now you want to frame Bush as being some good guy for Africa?Yeah Bush has done some horrible shit but he's also done say more than any other US president for Africa in like 50 years. To pretend like there's no nuance to the man at all is garbage.
Is this supposed to be a bad thing? It's the same everywhere. Domestic issues are almost always more important to people than foreign issues.reminds me how little America-Era thinks about outside their country
I believe a large portion of ERA is just very hurt and miserable.
Truly miserable, to want people to be held accountable for their crimes.How "miserable" I must be because I...*checks notes* want George W. Bush to be held responsible for his crimes!
What the hell is this? Now you want to frame Bush as being some good guy for Africa?
Spare me please. This thread is really something.
You can't just ignore all the terrible things Bush has done though and try and rehabilitate his image. It's dangerous and irresponsible.I really doubt that Michelle was referring to killing brown people in her statement. I also doubt that she has motivations for something horrid like that.
yes it is, it's the reason why nationalism is on the rise. And I don't think its fair to compare the reaction of other countries because very few of them are as involved in foreign affairs as the US, so americans not caring is vileIs this supposed to be a bad thing? It's the same everywhere. Domestic issues are almost always more important to people than foreign issues.
As an American citizen I weigh a president 60/40 domestic policy to foreign policy and that is caring a lot more about foreign policy than most other Americans.
Maybe get a fucking clue? Bush's Pepfar program has saved an estimated 13m lives in Africa.
To quote an African President Joyce Banda,
"The president who stood up and said 'I am going to do this' was Bush," Joyce Banda, a former president of Malawi, told me last week in what is a familiar show of gratitude. "Because of Pepfar, Bush is my best president."
Oh you know the second he's out of the office the media and everyone will work overtime to erase his crimes and scream forgive and forget. Can't have people actually realize we can hold our presidents accountable! (To be fair, this is something I'm expecting no matter who becomes president. Even if Bernie becomes president I would still expect him to tout forgive and move on)
Within the context of what she's obviously talking about, sure.
Era extreme gonna extreme, though. Keep on attacking this amazing black woman. The rest of us see you. And don't worry about us; we're used to it.
for example. lol. we see you people.
Judging by this thread it doesn't seem like she can repair his image. And I don't honestly think she's on a mission to do so. She's friends with him and has been friends with him for a while. Maybe this is just new news to a lot of people in this thread? I thought their friendship was pretty openly known?Not that hard to understand, really.
She can be friends with whoever she likes, same with Ellen and all the other Neoliberals.
Just don't help repair his image, yeah?