What does that first statement even mean?
What does that first statement even mean?
Question about one scene
was there any significance to them watching Austin Powers? Lol
the 'buying into his own hype' sentiment is kinda ridiculous.....considering preproduction on the film was already well under way before Hereditary hit theaters. Heck, he was shooting it like a month or two after Hereditary dropped.
Did a double feature yesterday, Toy Story 4 followed by Midsommar. Absolutely fell in love with this film and I just cant get it out of my head.
Dani seem's to be such a sympathetic character, standing in the sidelines to those around her. From the beginning we see she has, according to her boyfriend, always "enabled her sister". She's probably been in the shadows of her sister's mental illness, taking responsibility, allowing her sister to always rely on her. Then we see her one sided relationship with Christian, his gaslighting and abuse making her feel like she's clingy, that her birthday doesn't matter. She's the only one who remembers their anniversary (him thinking they had been together for 3.5 years when it was really 4 years, two weeks).
The cult manipulates her, but also provides the thing she seems to have lacked, sympathy and empathy. The cult feels her pain and she is never "to blame". The cult embraces her when she wins the competition, while Christian finds himself distracted by some young thang. He is absent from her life, and despite him always being absent and self absorbed, it is even more glaringly obvious to Dani. The cult has celebrated her and now, she is queen when before she was always catering to others.
This film is just so beautiful; Hereditary was my favorite film as a metaphor for abuse/mental illness/dysfunctional family, but Ari has elevated this metaphor for grief/abuse to another level.
I'm so excited that I've followed this director from the start, and cant wait to see this artist grow.
Maybe it's because I have experience in a similar relationship, but I disagree with the demonizing of Christian.
Yes, Dani is a sympathetic character, but to suggest that she's in the right and Christian is in the wrong with respect to their relationship seems completely at odds with the grey area the film tries to navigate. Speaking from experience, it's emotionally and physically exhausting to have a relationship that is thoroughly defined by mental health issues. When the friend said "that's what he's supposed to be there for" in response to Dani's worry that she's leaning too heavily on Christian, I frankly found that to be bullshit. Similar to how it was unhealthy for Dani to live in the shadows of her sister's mental health issues, and to allow that dynamic to define her - it's completely unhealthy for a relationship to live in the shadows of something similar. The only thing I would fault Christian for in the lead up to their trip to Sweden, is that he lacked the spine to do what needed to be done and break off a relationship that he was clearly not into. It was more an example of growing apart with one person clearly aware but scared to end it, and the other person completely oblivious to what's clear to everyone but them, than some type of one-sided abusive relationship.
Maybe it's because I have experience in a similar relationship, but I disagree with the demonizing of Christian.
Yes, Dani is a sympathetic character, but to suggest that she's in the right and Christian is in the wrong with respect to their relationship seems completely at odds with the grey area the film tries to navigate. Speaking from experience, it's emotionally and physically exhausting to have a relationship that is thoroughly defined by mental health issues. When the friend said "that's what he's supposed to be there for" in response to Dani's worry that she's leaning too heavily on Christian, I frankly found that to be bullshit. Similar to how it was unhealthy for Dani to live in the shadows of her sister's mental health issues, and to allow that dynamic to define her - it's completely unhealthy for a relationship to live in the shadows of something similar. The only thing I would fault Christian for in the lead up to their trip to Sweden, is that he lacked the spine to do what needed to be done and break off a relationship that he was clearly not into. It was more an example of growing apart with one person clearly aware but scared to end it, and the other person completely oblivious to what's clear to everyone but them, than some type of one-sided abusive relationship.
I mean, if him constantly gaslighting her throughout the entire film wasnt enough, I think you were supposed to draw your conclusion based on his interactions with his friend regarding the thesis. Dude was a piece of shit. Reluctantly doing what you view as the "right thing" in order to avoid confronting things you're afraid of doesnt make you a good person.
And relentlessly using your partner as an emotional crutch doesn't make you a good significant other. I'm not saying that Christian was a good guy (Another example of what you're saying would be him dissassociating himself from his "friend" when accusations were being thrown around), simply that it's a bit disingenuous to the complexity of relationships and this movie to suggest that Dani and Christian's relationship was black and white. She's definitely a lot more self aware of her faults to a degree, and attempts to rectify them though.
I think its a suspense/drama about a toxic relationship/grief/abuse.that prologue was some shit. like hereditary, i can't get this movie out of my head.
i don't think it's a horror movie?
it kinda broke my heart when he "apologized" to her after she found out he was going and she called him out on it, only for him to threaten to leave and stare at the door. her demeanor totally changed on a dime and she started apologizing to HIM. she killed this performance.
Dude. She was already worried that she was leaning on him too much and he was such a milquetoast piece of shit that he refused to communicate with her about ANY of his feelings. There is literally nothing that Dani could have done to fix the situation. The movie explicitly shows her trying to have a conversation with him about his feelings and he gaslights and steamrolls right through it.
Dude. She was already worried that she was leaning on him too much and he was such a milquetoast piece of shit that he refused to communicate with her about ANY of his feelings. There is literally nothing that Dani could have done to fix the situation. The movie explicitly shows her trying to have a conversation with him about his feelings and he gaslights and steamrolls right through it.
I haven't read the script but the first cut was 3hr 45minFor those who've seen the movie and read the early leaked script, any changes between the two?
They were in a relationship for 4 years. When he answered that he was in a relationship 3 and a half years, when it was actually 4 years and two weeks? That was the director telling you that Christian had emotionally checked out of that relationship A LONG time ago. Yes, Dani was self aware of the fact that she relied too heavily on Christian and tried to rectify that fact, but it was clearly too late and the damage had been done. I do agree that Christian was spineless though. Falling out of love with someone is okay, but he should have had the backbone to talk it out or break things off.
Also, I'll just say that there was only one person in this relationship who was an accessory to Murder, with their motive being their significant other no longer loving them and being drugged and raped.
Are you looking to have a good time or have a bad time. Not being facetious, I loved it but damn was it unpleasant.
For those who've seen the movie and read the early leaked script, any changes between the two?
It's the trippiest break up movie ever.that prologue was some shit. like hereditary, i can't get this movie out of my head.
i don't think it's a horror movie?
Aster has this way of capturing domestic drama that feels raw, uncomfortable, and unflattering, but also still cinematic and detached from reality. Real but also very much heightened in a way that only horror movies can do. It's different from, say how Sean Baker or the Dardennes portray their naturalistic drama. It reminds me of how Kubrick meshed the domestic terror with the supernatural terror in The Shining. Like Jack is so larger-than-life as a villain but also believably terrifying as an abusive husband/father.it kinda broke my heart when he "apologized" to her after she found out he was going and she called him out on it, only for him to threaten to leave and stare at the door. her demeanor totally changed on a dime and she started apologizing to HIM. she killed this performance.
In terms of plot significance, no
In terms of detailit's to show you they aren't a typical old-timey out-of-touch cult you usually see in "these kinds of films". They do stuff people of this era do that's natural, they just also do this ritual shit. It was simultaneously a comedic moment and a realization moment that there's more to these folk than the antiquated tradition
I assumed it was to emphasise that the community
weren't totally cut off from the outside world or technology. They still access modern media produced outside of the community and are happy for the children to engage with it.
Perhaps there's something more to it, but that's all I read from the line.
Is this scarier than hereditary? Yay or nay? \
I respect hereditary but the grieving scenes and the situation with the daughter is just TOO much for me.. saw it twice and got a panic attack the second time.