it's never over until it's actually over. It's why I love baseball. it can always come down to the last out no matter how far behind you are.He chocked up on a 2-1 pitch.
Hader is in their heads, this game is over.
it's never over until it's actually over. It's why I love baseball. it can always come down to the last out no matter how far behind you are.
That goes without saying that the Brewers played a better game today but the lack of ability to make contact on the ball has been the Achilles heel of this team for the last couple of years. Congrats to the Brewers for getting the job done.I mean if they lose it's because the brewers are a good team and just out played them?
is it not possible that the brewers just were better and they won because they were the better team today instead of it being the cubs sucking it up today?
As far as I have seen both teams have been playing well. And the pitching has been solid all game.
I'd give credit to Baez... he worked that hit hard.
Your confidence was unfounded :PThat's tough since it's a winner take all game. I'm confident in a series but not in a single game. But i'm sure it's gonna be the Brewers I'd bet MatPiscatella eating a Hotd Dog with ketchup on it.
why am i even talking to you if you're going to ignore all the shit i've referenced. i've pointed out several ways they're due for regression. it's like talking to a brick wall. i remember you doing he same thing last year and then disappearing afterwards. a 50 game stretch of baseball is a tiny sample size, and the fact that've accumulated a great record via close wins and over performing veterans should not come close to changing the outlook that the team had going into the season, which was a .500ish team.
of course, the brewers could win like 95 games this season (because baseball) and then you'll still be saying "i told you they were dominant", while learning absolutely nothing about the sport.
or they can just lose against the dodgers tomorrow and go away until next season :P
why am i even talking to you if you're going to ignore all the shit i've referenced. i've pointed out several ways they're due for regression. it's like talking to a brick wall. i remember you doing he same thing last year and then disappearing afterwards. a 50 game stretch of baseball is a tiny sample size, and the fact that've accumulated a great record via close wins and over performing veterans should not come close to changing the outlook that the team had going into the season, which was a .500ish team.
of course, the brewers could win like 95 games this season (because baseball) and then you'll still be saying "i told you they were dominant", while learning absolutely nothing about the sport.
i need to decompress from the brewers game first but probably a bit. go rockies, fuck the dodgers foreverAre we watching the next one? Let's go Rockies? (I've been to Denver, never to LA)
I'm good with this.
LOL Rekt.