Honestly this is amazing. I have both Xbox and Playstation but PC is where Baseball games shine. It would be nice if Sony implemented cross-buy between PC and playstation. That would keep me in their store.
This makes no sense. Where else would the MLB go?
2K? Their game was crap and they knew it, so they stopped.
EA? How has that NBA Live revival gone?
In house? MLB already tried that, nobody bought RBI Baseball.
Sony was the publisher already making a good game. They had the leverage and probably got a big check and years of exclusivity.
Any company was free to make a MLB game so they didn't need to force Sony.
Back when Take Two sign the third party exclusive rights deal Platform owners were free to make exclusive games for there own consoles. Sony did, MS and Nintendo didn't.
Take Two third party deal ended around 2012, and The MLB decided to produce their own.
This is probably more of the MLB dropping RBI and paying Sony to bring The Show multiplatform
Sony did not go into this negotiation wanting to lose a huge draw to their console. I would need tapes and minutes and R.Kellys grandma as a witness to believe the opposite.
Another company would totally make a new baseball game if given the license, and honestly, it would probably be ok. But I think sony saved a huge property from being pulled with this shrewd negotiation - MLB gets a mature respected game everywhere, sony makes more bank on it.
I STILL think someone else should be able to make games with it though - competition is still good for sports games imo.
It hasn't happened in years and years though.Another company would totally make a new baseball game if given the license, and honestly, it would probably be ok. B
Sony did not go into this negotiation wanting to lose a huge draw to their console. I would need tapes and minutes and R.Kellys grandma as a witness to believe the opposite.
Another company would totally make a new baseball game if given the license, and honestly, it would probably be ok. But I think sony saved a huge property from being pulled with this shrewd negotiation - MLB gets a mature respected game everywhere, sony makes more bank on it.
I STILL think someone else should be able to make games with it though - competition is still good for sports games imo.
Oh yea I think I remember seeing thatNintendo actually had one in development and I believe it was ready to ship but they canned it at the last second because 2K agreed to port their game to Gamecube
The MLB license is not exclusive. MLB could have handed it to EA or Take Two or whoever (assuming they wanted it, in recent years it didn't seem like anybody was interested) regardless of what Sony wanted. It wouldn't make any sense for MLB to negotiate their way into having less licensing partners, they would want as many as they could get. If push came to shove, they could have let Sony continue to make PS exclusive games while granting the license to someone else to make games on PC, Xbox and Switch (which they were already doing, via the RBI games, because, again, no other publishers were all that interested, at least not this generation).
Sony did not go into this negotiation wanting to lose a huge draw to their console. I would need tapes and minutes and R.Kellys grandma as a witness to believe the opposite.
Another company would totally make a new baseball game if given the license, and honestly, it would probably be ok. But I think sony saved a huge property from being pulled with this shrewd negotiation - MLB gets a mature respected game everywhere, sony makes more bank on it.
I STILL think someone else should be able to make games with it though - competition is still good for sports games imo.
Again MLB: The Show does really well very single yearIs it a huge draw?
MLB 19 released at the end of March and was on PS+ for October. I don't think any other PS4 exclusive has gone from release to free PS+ game that quick?
Probably a good title to get extra sales for across platforms.
Is it a huge draw?
MLB 19 released at the end of March and was on PS+ for October. I don't think any other PS4 exclusive has gone form release to free PS+ game that quick?
Probably a good title to get extra sales for across platforms.
Is it a huge draw?
MLB 19 released at the end of March and was on PS+ for October. I don't think any other PS4 exclusive has gone from release to free PS+ game that quick?
Probably a good title to get extra sales for across platforms.
Is it a huge draw?
MLB 19 released at the end of March and was on PS+ for October. I don't think any other PS4 exclusive has gone from release to free PS+ game that quick?
Probably a good title to get extra sales for across platforms.
They already announced MLB 20 and its different SKUsI think this year's was the highest selling ever.
I wouldn't be surprised if this news is what made it go to PS+ and they skip next year's to have time to develop for multiple consoles
or the Exclusive deal it's selfe....Wonder if this's Sony, or MLB forcing them to release it on more platform.
This is great news for players on all platforms. Exclusives on a specific licensed sports was always a bad idea.
Oh it was "having fun" prediction anyway, but I seem to miss that, but hey they can always cancel it....j/k
Now we need Nintendo games on PlayStation and Xbox to complete the circle
Its a seasonal GAAS game. Holding it to the standards of a traditional first party exclusive (God of War, Last of Us) doesn't really make sense. It makes sense to put it out for free in October (World Series month, also the end of the baseball season) to milk the last bit of straggler interest before moving on to next year's game. Based on Mat Piscatella, the game performs very well at retail, and has been performing strongly as a service title for Sony.
For reference, 2K sold last year's NBA game for like $3 after last season. That's not a sign that the series is struggling, in fact it's the opposite, those are among the best selling games of the year. But when you are reliant on micro-transactions at some point it makes sense to just get the game in people's hands at whatever cost.
I think this year's was the highest selling ever.
I wouldn't be surprised if this news is what made it go to PS+ and they skip next year's to have time to develop for multiple consoles
yes pls
Sony did not go into this negotiation wanting to lose a huge draw to their console. I would need tapes and minutes and R.Kellys grandma as a witness to believe the opposite.
Another company would totally make a new baseball game if given the license, and honestly, it would probably be ok. But I think sony saved a huge property from being pulled with this shrewd negotiation - MLB gets a mature respected game everywhere, sony makes more bank on it.
I STILL think someone else should be able to make games with it though - competition is still good for sports games imo.
It's a draw for fans of baseball.I took "huge draw" as more like Uncharted, where Sony will get a boost in PS4 sales from the mere release of a trailer with people buying consoles in anticipation. Whereas MLB is maybe more "I have the console I like baseball, it's a good quality game I'll buy it." It sells well but is not a huge draw like TLOU or something.
That company was MLB itselfAnother company was given the license and tried to make a totally new game. It was called RBI Baseball and it wasn't good.
This makes no sense. Where else would the MLB go?
2K? Their game was crap and they knew it, so they stopped.
EA? How has that NBA Live revival gone?
In house? MLB already tried that, nobody bought RBI Baseball.
Sony was the publisher already making a good game. They had the leverage and probably got a big check and years of exclusivity.
I took "huge draw" as more like Uncharted, where Sony will get a boost in PS4 sales from the mere release of a trailer with people buying consoles in anticipation. Whereas MLB is maybe more "I have the console I like baseball, it's a good quality game I'll buy it." It sells well but is not a huge draw like TLOU or something.