They are literally the best way to judge how a game looks aside from actually playing it. It just depends on which device you are looking the pics. If you look them in a device with a screen similar to Switch's, then you'll get an almost exact experience of how the game looks. If you are seeing those pics in a 32" monitor, obviously they will look worse.
Not sure why people keep thinking the Switch version got rid of the X-Ray effects.
I quickly attempted (they don't match up perfectly) comparison screens of the PS4 Pro version with the Switch version:
[/spoiler]
If you are taking screenshots while playing in docked mode, sure they will look worse since they are at 720p always and your gaming will probably run at 1080p on your TV. But I really don't see a big difference when you are taking them in handheld mode. If I look them at my phone (close to Switch's screen dimensions) they don't differ too much from how they look on Switch.
Are you playing the Switch version? How does it compare to docked mode? I think it looks pretty good docked, but we don't have undocked footage yet.Compressed video screenshot vs an uncompressed direct screenshot, so not fair at all, but it'll give you an idea of how the lighting and detail in stage backgrounds compares:
PS4 Pro:
So compressed screens speak louder than videos, huh? Yeah, he is the fanboy.
How about you check out the pics I just posted
Are you playing it or basing on the thread? Sorry for asking, but I really wish people would make that clear.it looks rough on handheld mode, docked looks pretty solid i think. Could've looked better at 30 fps but then people would complain about it, so...thems the breaks
Are you playing it or basing on the thread? Sorry for asking, but I really wish people would make that clear.
Oh, ok. Thanks for clearing up. Yeah, I'm curious about undocked footage. If it's comparable to docked, it's good enough for me. Hard to judge based on screens since they almost always looks terrible.No, no, just based on what i saw here. I dont like fighters :ppp
Oh, ok. Thanks for clearing up. Yeah, I'm curious about undocked footage. If it's comparable to docked, it's good enough for me. Hard to judge based on screens since they almost always looks terrible.
Looks like a ps2 game more or less. Switch looks like a ps3 game, more or less, that's a gen apart. So, it checks out
It wasn't. That footage is from docked mode, for some reason the person reposting the video (it was recorded by an Era user, posted yesterday) is claiming it's undocked, but it's not.
It wasn't. That footage is from docked mode, for some reason the person reposting the video (it was recorded by an Era user, posted yesterday) is claiming it's undocked, but it's not.
It wasn't. That footage is from docked mode, for some reason the person reposting the video (it was recorded by an Era user, posted yesterday) is claiming it's undocked, but it's not.
It isn't. The video was actually recorded and posted in 1080p yesterday. Someone saved the video before WB pulled out, and posted in 720p. I've watched the video in 1080p multiple times yesterday. It was originally posted by user X-Factor. Here is his original post:it's the inverse. someone posted that without saying what mode it was. first video is clearly undocked, you can see the difference between that and the second.
Like every Switch thread... People crying because it doesn't looks like their 3+ tflops console... Are we going to have this kind of post on every Switch+graphics related thread... I meant is really odvious at this point.
That's expected for a PS4 port that retains 60 fps. I understand sub native resolution is not ideal, but asking for native resolution + 60 fps for this port is completely unreasonable.People are crying because the game doesn't even reach Switch's own native resolution, which should be the standard, not PS Vita's.
Are you sure they developed the XB1/PS4 versions too? I thought they only did the Switch port.
That's expected for a PS4 port that retains 60 fps. I understand sub native resolution is not ideal, but asking for native resolution + 60 fps for this port is completely unreasonable.
Those 2 games were 60fps on other consoles and (barely) 30fps on Switch. It's not a good comparison.
But its 60 fps.. its a hybrid system you gonna get hybrid results. TF do yall be wanting?People are crying because the game doesn't even reach Switch's own native resolution, which should be the standard, not PS Vita's.
Not sure why people keep thinking the Switch version got rid of the X-Ray effects.
In MK11 they never appear during Fatal Blows (the new X-Rays/Super moves). Now they only show up during Krushing Blows (basically beefed up special moves with a brief cinematic), and occasionally during interactables. There are little to no Krushing Blows in any of these Switch videos.
I remember a time when people said Switch would never be able to run PS4 games. That later became, "Switch would never be able to run PS4 games at the same framerate".
Here's another example of the Switch doing exactly that. And for a game that is as impressive looking as MK11 which runs at 60fps, obviously cuts would have to be made.
I'm really not seeing the issue here. This is no MK9 Vita port.
I remember a time when people said Switch would never be able to run PS4 games. That later became, "Switch would never be able to run PS4 games at the same framerate".
Here's another example of the Switch doing exactly that. And for a game that is as impressive looking as MK11 which runs at 60fps, obviously cuts would have to be made.
I'm really not seeing the issue here. This is no MK9 Vita port.
People are crying because the game doesn't even reach Switch's own native resolution, which should be the standard, not PS Vita's.
And they also were sub native.