Not at all, and it wasn't my first thought when I saw the feminist videos crap, then I saw the rest and couldn't help but think it had to be someone full of privilege.
Didn't mean to come off as making an implication on your post. Apologizes if it came across that way. Just was curious. :)
No worries, it was good you asked or else I wouldn't have elaborated.
The same way you know that you can pin a negative situation on race, as long as the person is white,
What are you on about? He was already at 500k before being banned by YouTube.
I elaborated above, it would help if you read that.
I'm sure youtube's well documented fucked up algorithm has nothing to do with it.
Because he's a piece of garbage who makes disingenuous arguments and is bothered by things like ND being openly and unapologetically progressive.
I got recommended his videos after watching Easy Allies videos on RDR2. The polar fucking opposite of this bigoted prick.
Tell that to Richard Spender, Milo, and Alex Jones. Deplatforming works.
"NOPE, YOU GOT TRIGGERED LOL THAT'S WHY THE VIDEOS GOT POPULAR LELEL"
It's so bizarre that people even think the attention had anything to do with it. If it did, you'd think his twitter and other social media platforms would see a commensurate boost. He piggybacked off youtubes shit algorithms and the most popular entertainment product launch in HISTORY to use this as a soundboard.
Constitutional rights?
If I own a coffee shop with an open mic night and someone comes in and starts screaming racist slurs at other patrons am I obligated to continue to provide them a platform for the sake of free speech or am I able to ban them from my shop and from future open mic nights because I find their actions reprehensible and do not wish to provide them with a venue to spread their bile?
I know that it won't change their views. That's not my goal. Forcing it underground is a good thing - the alternative of letting it remain in the light is far worse.
To be fair, it's very likely that Google is suggesting that due to your browsing/watch history.
i'm not a fan of games that let you indiscriminately kill people in general, tbqh. you can't kill children as far as i know, so there's clearly a line even with fictional characters, but killing adults is fine? why? aren't they all just fictional?
YouTube is recommending it based on what you watched and not necessarily who you watch. A video about feminist/feminism, Red Dead Redemption 2, Rockstar, violence, PS4, Xbox, etc. I just right now did a search for PS4 and his Hitman 2 videos were in my search results.
Yeah, YouTube's recommendation system is shitty. But I think the autocomplete results are popularity based, at least on my TVs YouTube app. Just going into search without typing anything displays a bunch of keywords which are popular and relevant to the day, and when you start typing anything it seems to autocomplete the most popular results.
The issue is not the video content necessarily. It's that he specifically titled the video 'Red Dead Redemption 2 - Beating Up Annoying Feminist'. This would be like me uploading a video of GTA San Andreas where I am running over some of the Ballas gang and titling the video 'GTA San Andreas - Running Over Annoying Black People'.
