I thought he straight gatted dudes with a machine gun near the end of The Avengers.
Cap kills, he's a soldier.
I thought he straight gatted dudes with a machine gun near the end of The Avengers.
Batman won't kill his enemies who have a kill count in the thousands but he's okay with giving mooks traumatic brain injury and internal bleeding?
Captain America absolutely kills at least two goons on the tanker at the beginning of Winter Soldier
I thought this thread was going to be about Batman. OP fooled me.
Yeah and I feel like killing Nazis shouldn't count. The only good Nazi is a dead Nazi.
I don't see why gamer upset about it. Killing henchmen for 20 hours is a gaming mechanic. Unless you can find a better option, its just part of realistic 3d video games.This is every video game ever and I've been bitching about this trope for entire life. I hate it with a passion.
That brings up another issue. How many of these action movie mooks are women? Usually the number is zero, even in female-led movies. Applies to video games as well - the Tomb Raider reboot games are all about a woman going around an island killing men in increasingly brutal ways.Uhh I think only person he didn't straight up kill is the chick.
That brings up another issue. How many of these action movie mooks are women? Usually the number is zero, even in female-led movies. Applies to video games as well - the Tomb Raider reboot games are all about a woman going around an island killing men in increasingly brutal ways.
I've often seen MRA types bring this up and refer to this as the "disposable male".
That brings up another issue. How many of these action movie mooks are women? Usually the number is zero, even in female-led movies. Applies to video games as well - the Tomb Raider reboot games are all about a woman going around an island killing men in increasingly brutal ways.
I've often seen MRA types bring this up and refer to this as the "disposable male".
Signing as a "nameless mook" strips away your humanity, the pay, is good thought.
I dont remeber how he kills the son but there is a scene where he is killing multiple monks and pauses in killing the son running away
Simon: Now I know what you're thinking. You're probably thinking I'm gonna kill you. Well, I came here for one thing. And I did what I came here to do.
(hands the gun over to Armand) I got no beef with you.
[walks away]
Armand Tucker: That's a cool motherfucker. Now that's gangsta.
Luke busy murdering all of Jabba's thugs like it's no big deal, but gotta keep that purity later.
Cap isn't above killing. He used a gun and fought in WW2 lol.
He also didn't seem to care about Thanos losing his head either.
Maybe he was a medic in ww2Cap isn't above killing. He used a gun and fought in WW2 lol.
He also didn't seem to care about Thanos losing his head either.
He sure shoved those nails down their throat thoughthought this was a yakuza thread before realizing this wasn't gaming side
Kiryu never killed anyone
Its the dumbest in context. They legit kill millioms by flying through all of metropolis, then Zod uses eye beams when family could've just ran away in other direction as Superman held him.I never actually saw MoS but that's the scene everyone got upset about?
The bad guy forcing him into an unwinnable situation by threatening inocents and then him feeling bad afterward isn't really a big character problem.
It's probably the type of judgement Batman should have.
The trick is then to have the villain pull some hidden weapon so the hero can kill them righteously. Happens so oftenMost examples of this trope involve a hero killing mooks in self-defense but sparing the big bad because he's defenseless or defeated.
The problem is that the movie never once establishes that Superman has a problem with killing. It literally never comes up, and then the movie acts like it's the climax to a character arc that never happened. There's also the fact that it's about saving civilians when this Superman has shown a near-complete lack of concern for them during his fights previously.I never actually saw MoS but that's the scene everyone got upset about?
The bad guy forcing him into an unwinnable situation by threatening inocents and then him feeling bad afterward isn't really a big character problem.
It's probably the type of judgement Batman should have.