• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

More_Badass

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,621
Invisible Man was so good. I had rewatched Hollow Man the day before and this was the perfect palette cleanser. Not just is Whannell's film the thematic antithesis of Hollow Man, there are more than a few scenes with similar concepts, so the differences in execution were fascinating.

The Invisible Man (2020)
★★★★½
Since 1897, from Gothic supervillain to gross sexual predator, the sociopathy of the Invisible Man has always been tempered by madness. The corrupting freedom of lurking unseen drives its translucent terrors insane, but that outcome is only a comforting fantasy. Whannell's reinvented Invisible Man grounds Universal's classic monster in raw emotion and calculated cruelty. In this sci-fi horror-thriller, madness threatens the victim, rather than motivating the villain.

Empty spaces have rarely felt as terrifying and unnerving as in 2020's Invisible Man. Lingering camerawork and subtly unsettling framing allow negative space to imply presence, as we tensely scan the screen for signs of a menace that is most definitely standing right there. The film knows that we know its game; instead of using invisibility as an effects showcase, a minimalist approach propels the plot through patient suspense and sinister unease. An open door here, a footprint there, escalating towards inevitable confrontation. However, when the bloodshed arrives, Whannell proves that his cyberpunk actioner wasn't a fluke; legitimately shocking violence, cloaked brutality, and a stylish hospital rampage means Invisible Man delivers some very satisfying thrills.

The twisted tech genius Griffin of this film is only visibly onscreen for a scant few minutes, mostly existing as a silent stalking entity. But by the end, we know his character well. That's all a testament to Elizabeth Moss' powerhouse performance and Invisible Man's emotional upgrade over Upgrade. That previous movie felt stilted at times, but the characters in Invisible Man are very human and relatable. We never see the domestic abuse suffered by Cecilia, but her pained accounts, weary countenance, lasting trauma and fears ensure that her suffering is deeply felt. Griffin may be invisible but we see his evil through her psychological scars and desperation. Similarly, her friends and family having such genuine humanity allows the gaslighting manipulations to really sting when the consequences come to a head. An invisible stalker is scary, but having your life methodically obliterated while no one believes you is scarier.

I don't think it's hyperbole to say Whannell's film is the best example of a classic horror reimagining since The Thing and The Fly. Almost a century after Claude Rains threatened the moon, The Invisible Man brilliantly reinvents the concept with a film that could only exist today with its perspective, themes, and sleek style.
 

Rhomega

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,620
Arizona
Wait, is Invisible Man officially part of the Dark Universe, or is it a standalone?

Pokemon: Mewtwo Strikes Back - Evolution: Doesn't feature "Brother, My Brother". Also doesn't feature Mewtwo vs. Alakazam, my favorite Pokemon at the time. 0/5

It's been a long time since I've seen The First Movie, so I thought I'd check out the 3D remake. I can't complain about the dubbing (though only Eric Stuart can do Brock and James justice). The natural environments look great...but that makes the anime characters clash against it. There have been some changes. Pikachu one-shots a Drowzee instead of a Golem. Team Rocket are sailors on a Lapras boat instead of Vikings. There are some dialogue changes too. Team Rocket no longer confuses a Scyther for an Alakazam. However, two of the most famous quotes "We dreamed of creating the world's strongest Pokemon...and we succeeded" and "Pokemon weren't meant to fight..not like this." are altered. Characters repeat what the previous character just said. The biggest advantage of CGI however is that the battles have better cinematography. I especially like the Charizard vs. clone fight. Also interesting is that while it still only uses Gen I & II Pokemon, it does use the Gen IV moves Energy Ball and Leaf Storm in the Venusaur vs. clone fight.

For the movie itself, it's just cool to feature Mewtwo, the most powerful Pokemon in a world where Arceus and the Dark type don't exist. There are still cool battles. Team Rocket doesn't do anything useful except get Ash & Co to the island. It's fun, but I can't call it a great movie.
 

Deleted member 49611

Nov 14, 2018
5,052
the last movies i watched were:

Satanic Panic

MV5BYWQ1OGM4OGUtYzkyZS00ZmMwLTgzNmUtMzM5ZGE5MDAxM2Y1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNzc5MjA3OA@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,675,1000_AL_.jpg


Gwen

MV5BYzE4NjRjOWYtMWMyYy00ZjEwLTljYTctM2I0MDdhYThiOWM2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjI4NzUwNzg@._V1_SY1000_SX675_AL_.jpg


Ready or not

MV5BYzBkMzAyMDUtZTFkZS00OWUyLTgwM2ItNGI3MTQ5NzA3NTVkXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTkxNjUyNQ@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,670,1000_AL_.jpg
 
Last edited:

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,601
Get Carter
I must admit, I really had no idea what was going on for like the 3/4ths of the movie and needed to consult Wiki to make sure I was understanding it (I wasn't). Sort of a British Chinatown, and grimy as hell. Caine is an enjoyable anti-hero to watch, especially on his revenge murder spree at the end which is superficially entertaining, and I like that the film never lets you forget that at the end of the day he's still actually a shitty person person. This made for an unexpected double feature with the next one my list here.
7/10

Hardcore

I was a fan of Paul Schrader's directorial debut Blue Collar, and I think this might even be better. George C. Scott is just awesome in it; he perfectly walks this line of the typical stuck-up Midwestern conservative Christian who is just allergic to anything sex or porn related, to someone who you feel becomes increasingly empathetic for people like Niki, to just a burst of animal rage that can fly off the handle at any moment. Schrader does a great job of bringing you closer to the guy and then pushing you away so you never feels completely repellent nor likable. It's a complex portrait that both Scott and Schrader nail so well. And while it may not stack up to Taxi Driver or First Reformed's level, it's a similarly compelling 'spirit and the flesh'-esque story of a man of faith and certain convictions of the world crashing up against a seemingly amoral (or immoral) side of society. Just two films in as a director and Schrader's sense of atmosphere is already so on point.
8/10

Ready or Not

Sort of a You're Next meets Get Out mash up, though not as good as either one of those. It's caught in this weird space of where it's both too cheesy but also not cheesy enough, if that makes any sense. A solid genre film to spend 90 minutes at midnight watching, though. I was constantly distracted by how identical Samara Weaving looks to Margot Robbie. For a story that's all about pitting the newest member of the family against her in-laws, it was a strange choice to make the butler the main antagonist. I also give this movie an extra point for its ending, which I really enjoyed on two levels.
6/10
 

Einchy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
42,659
Color from Outer Space

Not as good as I was expecting, especially since I'm a sucker for these stories.

The way characters acted was super weird and not in a "this rock is making everyone crazy" weird but in a "humans don't react this way" weird. Like, there's a scene where
the mom points out that the daughter likes this guy, which makes the daughter storm out and while she's way out of earshot the mom says, "your clothes send the wrong message". Then right after we get a scene where the daughter is dramatically crying locked in her bedroom while the mom apologizes. I thought we were gonna get some backstory for why the daughter would react like this but it's never explained.

Or another scene where something with would cause people to have a lot of urgency has characters walking at a normal pace and not actually having any noticeable reaction.

The film was full of moments that left me wondering why they choose to have a character act in a specific way.
 
Last edited:
Bad Times at the El Royale: Excellent little movie with great performances from its entire cast. Jeff Bridges is the king as always, I could seriously watch him eat a carrot and be captivated. A bit on the slower side, but I like how the director takes his time to set a mood; the scene with Jon Hamm in the tunnels while the rehearsal song is played is awesome.
My pick for the most underrated film of its year -- and also probably the best Tarantino knockoff ever made.

The Scarlet Empress (1934): Director Josef von Sternberg and star/muse Marlene Dietrich's penultimate cinematic collaboration, a film that informs us it is "based on the diaries of Catherine II" - a very loose adaptation, indeed. While the Academy Award for Best Costume design wouldn't exist for another 14 years, the Academy Award for Best Production Design already did, and it's kind of inexcusable that this wasn't nominated for it -- notwithstanding that the film was a commercial flop, so much so that it kind of doomed the von Sternberg/Dietrich partnership. Von Sternberg's baroque vision of the Russian court has no relation to actual history, instead looking like a villain's Gothic hideout designed by Jean Cocteau, with leering gargoyles everywhere.

This is the one film of von Sternberg's I had seen before now, as I watched it when it was on TCM about two years ago, and didn't particularly enjoy it at the time. I liked it more this time around, mainly just because I understand a bit more the vibe that the film is going for -- honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if the team behind The Favourite was a big fan of this movie, as some of the jocular riffs on the costume drama formula seem similar (Louise Dresser's Empress Elizabeth has some not-insignificant resemblances to Olivia Colman's Queen Anne). At times this feels like a silent film that had dialogue added at the last minute, between so much of the story being told with title cards interspersed throughout and Dietrich's performance in particular, which at times seems like a parody of bad silent film acting. Dietrich's standard role in these movies is as a stone cold badass; the first 60% or so of the film she's asked to play Catherine as a young naif, and her performance is borderline pantomime. It's kind of terrible, but also kind of awesome? Then she becomes more your standard Dietrich character, which is always fun.

Also, content-wise, this movie opens with a Code certification, and I can't imagine how it got that, between the rampant sexuality throughout, the torture montages featuring topless women getting burnt at the stake, etc.
 

Unaha-Closp

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,720
Scotland
I rewatched the Robert Zemeckis Tom Hanks Castaway movie, not having seen it probably since it was new. Remembered liking it so was curious to see how it was now. As traumatic as the situation was I felt this movie was a little safe and sedate. I would have liked to see Hanks
contemplating suicide and how he talked about it to Wilson as he made the rope
rather than it being a reveal later. I feel if they made this film now they would spend time there. Regardless, it's still a good film. Liked seeing the fast-talking no time to waste Hanks at the start versus him at the end. I just wanted to see him suffer more I guess. Just more him alone in general really.
 
Oct 27, 2017
3,730
First Cow

This is a miracle of a film, imbued with such warmth and generosity it hardly registers when things take a turn towards tragedy. John Magaro and Orion Lee, via the one and only Kelly Reichardt, have gifted us a bromance for the ages. Basically every aspect of this is calibrated to my taste: I adore stories about small-scale entrepreneurs, doubly so if food is involved, and genuine male companionship is one of my favorite subjects; whereas the vast majority of people prefer action-packed storytelling that favors a certain degree of kineticism, I've always preferred "slow cinema" and character-based work; I wrote a short story about an ice cream truck driver and his trusted milk cow when I was in college, so I got an extra kick out of that; and I've always had a deep appreciation for the American frontier, the way the untamed landscape mirrored man's untamed nature and how it brought together an odd mishmash of people long before diversity was a topic of conversation (whites, blacks, latinos, Native Americans, Asians, etc, with further ethnic/cultural breakdowns. Not to say white power structures weren't in place!). Plus it's slyly hilarious, with charming, idiosyncratic dialogue and smart visual gags peppered throughout, and a committed cast of supporting players, including a wonderfully naive turn from Toby Jones. It's also fucking gorgeous, a restrained 4:3 feast for the eyes (there's a simple shot of blueberries being dropped into a cloth that made me giggle with admiration), which coupled with the godly sound design creates a legitimate audiovisual marvel. Even at its sparesest, the frame always feels full of life. It's rare that I feel I've seen my favorite movie of the year just two months in, but this is going to be a haaaard act to top. Already itching to see it again. Bless you Kelly.
 

Messofanego

Member
Oct 25, 2017
26,091
UK
First Cow

This is a miracle of a film, imbued with such warmth and generosity it hardly registers when things take a turn towards tragedy. John Magaro and Orion Lee, via the one and only Kelly Reichardt, have gifted us a bromance for the ages. Basically every aspect of this is calibrated to my taste: I adore stories about small-scale entrepreneurs, doubly so if food is involved, and genuine male companionship is one of my favorite subjects; whereas the vast majority of people prefer action-packed storytelling that favors a certain degree of kineticism, I've always preferred "slow cinema" and character-based work; I wrote a short story about an ice cream truck driver and his trusted milk cow when I was in college, so I got an extra kick out of that; and I've always had a deep appreciation for the American frontier, the way the untamed landscape mirrored man's untamed nature and how it brought together an odd mishmash of people long before diversity was a topic of conversation (whites, blacks, latinos, Native Americans, Asians, etc, with further ethnic/cultural breakdowns. Not to say white power structures weren't in place!). Plus it's slyly hilarious, with charming, idiosyncratic dialogue and smart visual gags peppered throughout, and a committed cast of supporting players, including a wonderfully naive turn from Toby Jones. It's also fucking gorgeous, a restrained 4:3 feast for the eyes (there's a simple shot of blueberries being dropped into a cloth that made me giggle with admiration), which coupled with the godly sound design creates a legitimate audiovisual marvel. Even at its sparesest, the frame always feels full of life. It's rare that I feel I've seen my favorite movie of the year just two months in, but this is going to be a haaaard act to top. Already itching to see it again. Bless you Kelly.
Sounds awesome. I've only seen Certain Women which I liked in parts, definitely gonna see this when it comes out here. Interesting tidbit, Kelly cast John Magaro after seeing him in Todd Haynes' Carol, which my wife mentioned yesterday (one of her fave films) after praising Portrait Of A Lady On Fire being as great as that. I'm due to show watch Safe with her for the first time.
 

Kazaam

Member
Oct 26, 2017
1,642
London
Hey everyone! The calculations for the Movie of the Year thread are done and the results are in (pretty predictable, but nonetheless impressive)... I'm a bit more time constrained than I thought I would be right now, but the goal is to have the results thread up in 24 hours from now
 
Empathy, Inc.:
Ah, who doesn't love a good low budget sci-fi feature bursting with ideas? What it lacks in the money to pull off any fancy, this film makes up with a bevy of engaging plot developments, social commentary, and philosophical intrigue that very capably pushes past the constraints that the lack of budget could have otherwise curtailed. Indeed, the control it has over its scale is quite impressive, knowing to keep its focus tight and to maintain a surprisingly brisk pacing to follow through on its promise. Occasionally, the budget does creep up in terms of somewhat limp staging of what could have led to some visually striking moments and some shortcuts it takes to keep the plot going, but the filmmakers here do provide a strong dread-soaked atmosphere that amps up the tension and suspense throughout, leading to an ending that manages to hit a lot of notes for quite the orchestral sting. Very impressive stuff and I sure do hope that the folks behind this get the chance to work on something bigger in the near future.

Blood & Flesh: The Reel Life and Ghastly Death of Al Adamson:
Al Adamson certainly has his fans out there, but even if you aren't the type to dive into the very treacherous waters of Z-grade schlock, no experience is necessary to both enjoy and to be enthralled by his life story as it is depicted here. With a massive amount of personalities getting the chance to talk about the man, including some archival footage from Adamson himself, the first hour of the film is the kind of entertaining anecdote dispensary that you would have hoped for, as they all talk in great detail about the ins and outs of the more mercenary aspects of the B-movie business, from how long a film can actually sit on a shelf to the way they get recycled when their owner has a chance to make a quick buck elsewhere with a different title. And the making of bits of the films themselves are pure gold, with the story that eventually turns into Dracula vs. Frankenstein being a major highlight with all the twists and turns it takes before arriving at the crap heap the footage makes it out to be. As is often the case, the stories behind the making of those films prove to be far more enriching than watching those films, but through it all, we get a great picture of the kind of camaraderie that Adamson inspired in his cast and crew of regulars, creating a surprisingly wholesome atmosphere for a documentary surrounding cutthroat exploitation pictures.

That's important, as when we do finally get to the end of his life, the doc takes on a far more serious true crime vibe, reminding you that the guy we just spent all that time with through his friends and coworkers really didn't deserve what happened to him. Even with the opening of the documentary telling you outright the way his body was discovered, the way it's all put together in the final 40 minutes is expertly handled in terms of maintaining tension and dread, utilizing a riveting interview with his housekeeper to put a human face on Al that the detectives assigned to the case couldn't, resulting in a very emotional conclusion that pays off big time. It only seemed like on the surface that having to juggle the wacky B-movie antics with the deadly serious real life murder case would have led to some serious fumbling, but the filmmakers here prove adept at bridging the gap between the two for something very special.

Does it make me want to watch any of Adamson's films myself? Hardly, but it makes a strong case for why he was such an influential figure in his own right, and the doors he opened for some filmmakers (a pair of rather influential Hungarian cinematographers got their start on his productions), reopened for some older talent (Russ Tamblyn is a riot in this), and continuing a filmmaking tradition that's still maintained to this day to really make you wish that things didn't turn out so horribly for him in the end for the mark he left on everyone in his orbit in the end, both professionally and personally. I'd even go as far to say that he deserves his own feature film adaptation, a la Ed Wood, with how rich his life story turned out to be, but on one condition: it absolutely, positively needs to have the part where an over-the-hill chimpanzee headbutts a script supervisor on the set of one of his films. If a blurb like that doesn't get you interested in at least watching this, then I don't know what will.
 

Kyuuji

The Favonius Fox
Member
Nov 8, 2017
31,925
"Your rental for Portrait of a Lady on Fire has expired"
*immediately rents again*


I don't know what I'm going to do between this leaving theatres and being available to own lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.