My point is that even if it happenned it wouldnt be by Deku just using talk no jutsu, it took Deku and Todoroki fighiting stain for them to form a friendship
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
My Hero Academia |OT2| No More Heroes
- Thread starter bunkitz
- Start date
- Status
Then say that next time instead of whatever you just did
I don't think Shiggy will switch sides at all. Nor do I feel comparing Todoroki to Shiggy, an actual villain who has threatened to kill Deku, is an apt comparison. Completely different situations
This is probably the only series where I specifically don't wanna see any single villain switch sides with legit the only exception being gentle. Anybody else literally anybody else will immediately turn me off
I don't really count Gentle as a villain, he was a joke criminal but never really evil, plus the end of his arc already hinted on him being reform
Exactly it makes perfect sense for them two, some will argue stain but nah I'm good on that one too
I mean you were the one that answered my post saying that " I don't want Deku out here turning all his enemies to friends", so if you don't believe in that yourself why post that as an answer?
Anyway if it took more than talk no jutsu to make Todoroki frindly it would take much more for shigaraki so I think the comparison is apt.
Last edited:
The two Villians I can see working with the heroes outside of Gentle in some kind of limited capacity is Stain and Spinner if only because their Ideology is very mutable and open to being manipulated.
I'd say Gentle and to an extent La Brava fit more into the antagonist category than villain category.
Also on my travels through Twitter I found a Toga animation and I thought the resident Toga fans in the thread would like it.
Also on my travels through Twitter I found a Toga animation and I thought the resident Toga fans in the thread would like it.
Dude, you're really starting to irk me.
This is what I said. First you attribute something DTL said to how I feel when I said the exact opposite and then you try to misquote me.
Stop.
I didn't misquote you tho, and seriously I am really lost of what you mean now. If you don't believe that will happen then you pretty much agree with me. Then I see no reason to continue to argue about something that there is not to argue about.
To be fair we know very little about most of the League's members motivation and backstory, Horikoshi can still write it in a way that makes sense for some of the characters
Thanks I like it
Read closely.
1. DTL suggested Deku and Shiggy become allies
2. I disagreed, saying if Deku does some talk no jutsu I'd be out
3. And then you come in saying Deku used Talk no Jutsu on Todoroki and it didn't solve all his problems. Sure, fair enough
4. I respond with Todoroki is not a villain like Shigaraki. I don't want Deku doing talk no jutsu on explicit villains like Shiggy
5.You then for some reason think I want Shiggy to get talk no jutsued
6. You also keep bringing up Todoroki as if that's a good comparison. It's not
Stuff like that irks me because I have a hard time believing anyone can be that willfully obtuse. That's why I asked if you read my posts, my position was pretty clear
Well I found the problem, i didnt say that. I believed that you thought that shiggy can be talk no jutsued not that you want him to be talk no jutsued.
I think it is a good comparison because todoroki isnt a villain so it is much easier to write them becoming friendlier than shiggy and deku. But even then the manga took its time building the relationship and why they are close friends now.
It'll be revealed deku quirk all along was talk no jutsu
this is a series with heroes and villains tho. It's not ninja vs ninjas it's not pirates it's not space aliens. It would be weird to watch these heroes team up with the ppl they get both fame from, are meant to protect.
If you're gonna quote me, make damn sure you know what I said. That's a major pet peeve of mine, and I don't let it go
As far as the rest of it, I don't agree but I'm honestly tired of having to clarify my position because reading comprehension isn't a thing these days
I mean the only time i quoted you was ctrl c+v so what i did wrong?
About the rest if you have something to say, say it, misunderstantings keep happenning if you dont
I have been reading this manga more as a Marvel fan so I'm really used to the idea of villains becoming heroes, alot of the members of the league of villains and Meta Liberation Army just want to improve society it's just their methods that makes them villains
Last edited:
Read through the official translation of 218 and man the unofficial version made Miyashita seem like much more of an ass than he really was. Also the unofficial translation made it seem like all the people in the room were children of Destro while in the official version it just says Destro only had a child which is presumably referring to the main bad of the arc. Lesson of the day is to wait for the official translation instead of reading through the unofficial.
Glad to hear it!
Dude, you came at me at some stuff you thought I'd said.
I disagree with what you said about Todoroki and Shiggy being a good comparison. Said it before and I don't really want to discuss it with you at this point so I'm not.
Destro is from the time that quirks werent called quirks so he must be really old, i doubt the CEO is his real son.
I would like to know what tho
I dont think it is that new because the secretary didn't know what a meta ability was.
You said yourself
I just corrected saying that it wasn't what I think. What I said was:
I never said anything about wanting
I'm done with you man.
You're quoting things I've already answered. Don't quote me again
Can you please read what i posted, I am not giving an argument, I am just explaining that I don't think that you want shigaraki to be talk no jutsued
The problem is you're not reading what I'm saying. You obviously don't get it and
I already answered this question
So why in the blueberry fuck would I keep talking to you? For whatever reason you're seeing what you want to see in my posts. The miscommunication is on you.
He should be banging his head against it. Hard. That would sum up my feelings right now
Your explaining something I never said? Nani?
The man is talking to a brick wall.
Lol, I gotta say though that you have much more patience than I do I would have snapped much quicker.
What exactly you never said that I am claiming that you are
If you understand can you explain to me what is making him so angry to wish for me to bang my head against the wall?
For the last time, I do not think Deku can or should talk no jutsu Shiggy. All I said was that if it happened I'd be out
Jesus. Fucking. Christ
Oh my god I am not saying that you believe that anymore, I am just saying that I never talked about you wanting shiggy to be TNJ'd
I used the past tense, i even said this
So please stop being angry and wishing harm to others for something so petty
From what I get, Trace said he doesn't like the concept of Deku doing Talk no Justu on Shigaraki, he also said that the only way he can see Shigaraki and Deku teaming up is as a one-time thing that will fall apart right after, you've then been misquoting him saying he believes shigaraki can be talk no Justu which he never said
Is that it
I didn't misquote him tho, I even made a post that we pretty much agree on this
Bro, you don't understand. Almost went full shonen but it's not worth it
See how you read into things that aren't there?This is why I'm done with you man. The man is me, I should be the one banging my head against the brick wall.
Btw, you did talk about Shiggy being tnj'ed to me, or else what is this
Seems like you're talking about Shiggy to me, and how you think I think he can be talked no jutsu
So you're either not understanding or you're full of it
That was my first answer, you explained after, then I said that I don't think that was an argument against what i said.
I even said after that
See the past tense
Then say I not he, because he can be anyone
Then you misquoted me . Even though you keep saying you didn't. And I had to waste a page on shit you didn't get through no fault of my own.
Congrats? 🎉
And yeah, I know I'm being a dick but that happens when I know I'm in the right about something
I interpreting you one way isn't misquoting you, I didn't say that to irk you
Seriously I am not trying to make you angry or anything, I read your post and I thought you believed that could happen, it didn't, I didn't do that with malice.
Misquoting is when someone does something with the intention of changing the meaning. I didn't
Cmon what I did for you to be like that?
I shouldn't have to tell you the same thing 30 fucking times, you think I'm gonna be all smiles after that?
If you truly mean what you say the next time you quote me make sure you know exactly what it is I said, and if you don't, ask. What we're not gonna do is assume things. Period
I just want you to not be angry by assuming that I am doing things on purpose. If I gave a bad argument just point it out, no need to assume i am doing that to irk you. English isn't even my first language so there are some things that i read wrong. People can be wrong.
- Status