What in the world makes you think Nintendoowns it? LOLwait, why would Bamco trademark the latter? or I guess, it's just the name, since nintendo owns the second game
Well TECHNICALLY Namco would own the trademark, even if Nintendo owns the game itself (having evidently been entirely behind the production and publishing).wait, why would Bamco trademark the latter? or I guess, it's just the name, since nintendo owns the second game
Evidently not.wait, why would Bamco trademark the latter? or I guess, it's just the name, since nintendo owns the second game
but Xenosaga Trilogy doesn't make marketing sense? Bamco is weird. unless Nintendo/Monolith Soft is pushing for it. or this is all nothing
nah, nintendo owns the sequel. I guess Bamco can do whatever with the name
Nintendo published the second game but Bandai Namco owns the copyright, per the box artwait, why would Bamco trademark the latter? or I guess, it's just the name, since nintendo owns the second game
Given previous statements about market research having them think a Xenosaga trilogy wouldn't be worth it, maybe their internal research has Baten Kaitos faring better since it'd probably be an easier project overall.but Xenosaga Trilogy doesn't make marketing sense? Bamco is weird. unless Nintendo/Monolith Soft is pushing for it. or this is all nothing
All we know is that Nintendo published it. If the trademark rights are being renewed by Namco, then I think it's clear that Namco does own it.nah, nintendo owns the sequel. I guess Bamco can do whatever with the name
Origins sort of is. I believe Nintendo published and produced the game worldwide. It was sort of a Bayo 2 scenario.
the name and IP, yea, but the game was a Bayonetta 2 situation. hence why Origins stuff has been in Smash Bros, but not the first game, for exampleAll we know is that Nintendo published it. If the trademark rights are being renewed by Namco, then I think it's clear that Namco does own it.
Bonkey KongWhenever I see BK, I always think of Burger King.
This is much better news.
Yep.the name and IP, yea, but the game was a Bayonetta 2 situation. hence why Origins stuff has been in Smash Bros, but not the first game, for example
They only own Origins, but they're not able to do anything with it without Bandai-Namco's OK as they own the IP. It's pretty much the original Bayonetta 2 situation, just with a strangely larger amount of hesitance on the part of the IP's owner.
Possibly? Dunno' if we'll ever know for sure at this point.the name and IP, yea, but the game was a Bayonetta 2 situation. hence why Origins stuff has been in Smash Bros, but not the first game, for example
Bonkey Kong the Orangutan
It's Bamco. Switch is off the table with the exception of some scraps or paid work.It would be really great to see these as ports to the Switch or anywhere else. Hopefully it happens but we'll just have to see.