• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Deleted member 3812

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,821
Incoming U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has just stated today, December 22 that if Trump and the GOP will not take action to stop the government shutdown, the U.S. House in January "will swiftly pass legislation to re-open government":



If @realDonaldTrump & Republicans choose to continue this #TrumpShutdown, the new House Democratic majority will swiftly pass legislation to re-open government in January.
 

Rad Bandolar

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,036
SoCal
Ok. It would still need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.

Good gamesmanship, I guess. Trump has essentially made this whole thing a referendum on his wall, so the Democrats are going to play chicken and see who blinks first.
 

Ac30

Member
Oct 30, 2017
14,527
London
Ok. It would still need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.

Good gamesmanship, I guess. Trump has essentially made this whole thing a referendum on his wall, so the Democrats are going to play chicken and see who blinks first.

There's no incentive to pass a spending bill with wall funding. None.

Unless they get an ACA revamp, DACA, and infrastructure. Maybe.
 

VectorPrime

Banned
Apr 4, 2018
11,781
Ok. It would still need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.

Good gamesmanship, I guess. Trump has essentially made this whole thing a referendum on his wall, so the Democrats are going to play chicken and see who blinks first.

It will pass the House and Senate with veto proof majorities so Trump has no say. The only reason why it didn't already is Ryan refuses to bring it up for a vote. But as soon as the new Congress sits Pelosi will bring up the clean spending bill and reopen the government.
 

Bandage

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,626
The Internet
I really hope this momentum where Dems just ram through good shit for the next two years keeps going.
Just really twist the knife into Trump
 

Ithil

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,372
Ok. It would still need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.

Good gamesmanship, I guess. Trump has essentially made this whole thing a referendum on his wall, so the Democrats are going to play chicken and see who blinks first.
The Senate already passed a CR with no wall funding. Then Trump said he wouldn't sign it (because Fox News told him not to) and the worthless toad Paul Ryan took it up in the House, with a CR with wall funding. That bill has already died in the Senate, hence the shutdown. It doesn't have the votes.

The previous CR will pass in the House and Senate with no problems, and Trump alone will have to sign it or be the only one shutting down the government. Then he'd likely be hit with a veto proof CR anyway.
 
Oct 27, 2017
5,264
I still worry that x number of dumb Americans will see this whole thing as Democrats choosing "illegal immigrants" over "real Americans who need a functioning government." But I hope x will be the normal 30%.
 

Astronut325

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,948
Los Angeles, CA
The Senate already passed a CR with no wall funding. Then Trump said he wouldn't sign it (because Fox News told him not to) and the worthless toad Paul Ryan took it up in the House, with a CR with wall funding. That bill has already died in the Senate, hence the shutdown. It doesn't have the votes.

The previous CR will pass in the House and Senate with no problems, and Trump alone will have to sign it or be the only one shutting down the government. Then he'd likely be hit with a veto proof CR anyway.
Yup. Just bring that to vote as speaker and done.
 

Rad Bandolar

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,036
SoCal
It will pass the House and Senate with veto proof majorities so Trump has no say. The only reason why it didn't already is Ryan refuses to bring it up for a vote. But as soon as the new Congress sits Pelosi will bring up the clean spending bill and reopen the government.

Where are you getting this from? How would it pass with a veto proof majority? The Republicans have no incentive to play ball.
 

Shoeless

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,978
This sounds like a prudent move, especially if they keep hollering it from the rooftops. If Trump gets wind of the fact that they can stop the shutdown without him once they take control in January, he'll have to assess whether he wants them to take credit for it, or whether he wants to pre-empt them and claim he just "defeated' the Democrats and ended the shutdown.

On the other hand, if everyone is telling him the Democrats will do this in January, but he refuses to believe them until it finally happens, this will be a hilariously grand introduction to his remaining Lame Duck Presidency. The New Year beginning with Democrats overriding a shutdown that he instigated is going to make him look weak, even if he doesn't realize it yet.
 

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
Ok. It would still need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.

Good gamesmanship, I guess. Trump has essentially made this whole thing a referendum on his wall, so the Democrats are going to play chicken and see who blinks first.

The bipartisan bill overwhelmingly passed the senate and would have been veto proof in the House.
 

ThreePi

Member
Dec 7, 2017
4,763
It will pass the House and Senate with veto proof majorities so Trump has no say. The only reason why it didn't already is Ryan refuses to bring it up for a vote. But as soon as the new Congress sits Pelosi will bring up the clean spending bill and reopen the government.

I wouldn't trust that. If the House ends up passing the Senate Bill then it puts Trump on the spot. But if Pelosi passes anything even marginally different that goes back to the Senate for a vote Mitch might not take it up on principal. McConnell is party-first in the most evil sense possible and will do anything to keep the Democrats from getting a "win."
 

Rad Bandolar

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,036
SoCal
The bipartisan bill overwhelmingly passed the senate and would have been veto proof in the House.

That was a bill passed by a Republican House and approved by a Republican senate. It was only bipartisan because the Democrats wanted to appear to be reasonably cooperative and stick the eventual shutdown on Trump.

The game will change in January and the Republican Senate and the Republican minority in the House will be playing a from a different playbook. They'll want to close ranks with their President and demand funding for the "wall" because it plays well to the people who actually elect them.

And the Democrats aren't going to pass the exact same CR Bill. They're going to add or subtract things that the Senate can object to and make political hay from.

At that point, it becomes a game of political chicken.
 

Bandage

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,626
The Internet
That was a bill passed by a Republican House and approved by a Republican senate. It was only bipartisan because the Democrats wanted to appear to be reasonably cooperative and stick the eventual shutdown on Trump.

The game will change in January and the Republican Senate and the Republican minority in the House will be playing a from a different playbook. They'll want to close ranks with their President and demand funding for the "wall" because it plays well to the people who actually elect them.

And the Democrats aren't going to pass the exact same CR Bill. They're going to add or subtract things that the Senate can object to and make political hay from.

At that point, it becomes a game of political chicken.
Which Republicans will lose
The longer the shutdown lasts, the worse it is for them.
 

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
That was a bill passed by a Republican House and approved by a Republican senate. It was only bipartisan because the Democrats wanted to appear to be reasonably cooperative and stick the eventual shutdown on Trump.

The game will change in January and the Republican Senate and the Republican minority in the House will be playing a from a different playbook. They'll want to close ranks with their President and demand funding for the "wall" because it plays well to the people who actually elect them.

And the Democrats aren't going to pass the exact same CR Bill. They're going to add or subtract things that the Senate can object to and make political hay from.

At that point, it becomes a game of political chicken.

Which ever party that deliberately shuts the government down is the one that loses.
 

HStallion

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
62,262
I wouldn't trust that. If the House ends up passing the Senate Bill then it puts Trump on the spot. But if Pelosi passes anything even marginally different that goes back to the Senate for a vote Mitch might not take it up on principal. McConnell is party-first in the most evil sense possible and will do anything to keep the Democrats from getting a "win."

Which leaves this on the GOP yet again.
 

HStallion

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
62,262
That was a bill passed by a Republican House and approved by a Republican senate. It was only bipartisan because the Democrats wanted to appear to be reasonably cooperative and stick the eventual shutdown on Trump.

The game will change in January and the Republican Senate and the Republican minority in the House will be playing a from a different playbook. They'll want to close ranks with their President and demand funding for the "wall" because it plays well to the people who actually elect them.

And the Democrats aren't going to pass the exact same CR Bill. They're going to add or subtract things that the Senate can object to and make political hay from.

At that point, it becomes a game of political chicken.

And this still leaves it at the feet of the GOP
 

Ithil

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,372
I wouldn't trust that. If the House ends up passing the Senate Bill then it puts Trump on the spot. But if Pelosi passes anything even marginally different that goes back to the Senate for a vote Mitch might not take it up on principal. McConnell is party-first in the most evil sense possible and will do anything to keep the Democrats from getting a "win."
Then the shutdown is on Mitch. The House passed a bill and he didn't take it up? At some point they need to you know, not have the government shutdown anymore. The longest it's been shutdown is 21 days in the mid 90s.
 

Rad Bandolar

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,036
SoCal
Which Republicans will lose
The longer the shutdown lasts, the worse it is for them.

How so? The next election is in two years and this'll be a forgotten blip by the time 2020 rolls around, plus their electorate is all about the wall. At this point, they don't have much to lose and they're going to use this to get as many concessions as they can from the Democrats.
 

HStallion

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
62,262
How so? The next election is in two years and this'll be a forgotten blip by the time 2020 rolls around, plus their electorate is all about the wall. At this point, they don't have much to lose and they're going to use this to get as many concessions as they can from the Democrats.

Some of you really need to stop giving a shit about what his base thinks. Pelosi could provide a cure for cancer with this bill and they would hate it. Just a reminder but his base wasn't enough to stop them from losing 40 seats in the house. Everyone else matters and they aren't too keen on the shit that's been going down.
 

Bandage

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,626
The Internet
How so? The next election is in two years and this'll be a forgotten blip by the time 2020 rolls around, plus their electorate is all about the wall. At this point, they don't have much to lose and they're going to use this to get as many concessions as they can from the Democrats.
People kept saying this in 2017 and 2018 and then we had the biggest Dem win in decades.
 

Rad Bandolar

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,036
SoCal
Some of you really need to stop giving a shit about what his base thinks. Pelosi could provide a cure for cancer with this bill and they would hate it. Just a reminder but his base wasn't enough to stop them from losing 40 seats in the house. Everyone else matters and they aren't too keen on the shit that's been going down.

You guys seem to think that Republicans will suddenly roll over because the Dems have the House, and they'll play along with whatever fantasy scenario you've dreamt up.

Here's the thing: the opposition has their own priorities and their own plans, and their motivations aren't the same as yours. You think that the Republicans also view this as about the shutdown and making Trump look bad, and that they'll act accordingly, but they're not going to do what you think they should do, because that's not what this is about for them once the House is seated.

You think McConnell cares that the Repubs lost 40 seats? He's seen both chambers flip back and forth numerous times over the last two decades. Hell, there was a Democratic supermajority in the Senate just ten years ago. He knows it's a divided electorate. He knows the pendulum will swing back. He knows there's a core electorate for the Repubs that's still big enough to matter. He knows he has a massive propaganda arm in Fox News that'll gear up to oppose Nancy Pelosi, just like last time. He knows Schumer is a dish rag who'll compromise on anything to get a "win".

He knows that all that matters is the power that you have right now and using that power to get what you want. As long as he's Senate majority leader, and as long as there's a Republican in the White House, he's going to exercise every option available to him to extract concessions and launch the opening salvo in the new campaign of demonizing Pelosi and the Democratic House.
 
Last edited:

Armaros

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,901
You guys seem to think that Republicans will suddenly roll over because the Dems have the House, and they'll play along with whatever fantasy scenario you've dreamt up.

Here's the thing: the opposition has their own priorities and their own plans, and their motivations aren't the same as yours. You think that the Republicans also view this as about the shutdown and making Trump look bad, and that they'll act accordingly, but they're not going to do what you think they should do, because that's not what this is about for them once the House is seated.

You think McConnell cares that the Repubs lost 40 seats? He's seen both chambers flip back and forth numerous times over the last two decades. He knows it's a divided electorate. He knows the pendulum will swing back. He knows there's a core electorate for the Repubs that's still big enough to matter. He knows he has a massive propaganda arm in Fox News that'll gear up to oppose Nancy Pelosi, just like last time. He knows Schumer is a dish rag who'll compromise on anything to get a "win".

He knows that all that matters is the power that you have right now and using that power to get what you want. As long as he's Senate majority leader, and as long as there's a Republican in the White House, he's going to exercise every option available to him to extract concessions and launch the opening salvo in the new campaign of demonizing Pelosi and the Democratic House.

And you think McConnell refusing to take up a spending bill to stop a shutdown will hurt Pelosi and the Dems?

When her bill will sail out of the House? And the public do not want a shutdown for a policy debate?
 

Steel

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
18,220
Ok. It would still need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.

Good gamesmanship, I guess. Trump has essentially made this whole thing a referendum on his wall, so the Democrats are going to play chicken and see who blinks first.
A clean temporary spending bill already passed the Senate. Paul Ryan isn't putting it on the floor but Pelosi can. Trump would need to veto it.
 

Autodidact

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,729
And you think McConnell refusing to take up a spending bill to stop a shutdown will hurt Pelosi and the Dems?

When her bill will sail out of the House? And the public do not want a shutdown for a policy debate?
Strong White Daddy Republicans always control everything, even when they don't.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 3812

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,821
I'm certain the clean temporary spending bill that the Senate passed will be picked up by Pelosi and she will put it on the floor for a final vote, once that happens, it goes to Trump. If Trump vetoes, it can go back to Congress for a veto override and from what I understand, there's enough support for a veto override for this spending bill so once Congress overrides Trump's veto, the temporary spending bill will become law, government reopens and there's absolutely nothing Trump can do once the veto override occurs.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 3812

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,821
Any bill sent to the President that the President vetoes, that veto can be overridden and the bill becomes law, what is required is a veto override vote that has a two-thirds majority in both chambers of Congress: https://www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/override_of_a_veto.htm

override of a veto - The process by which each chamber of Congress votes on a bill vetoed by the President. To pass a bill over the president's objections requires a two-thirds vote in each Chamber. Historically, Congress has overridden fewer than ten percent of all presidential vetoes.
 

Tovarisc

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,404
FIN
And you think McConnell refusing to take up a spending bill to stop a shutdown will hurt Pelosi and the Dems?

When her bill will sail out of the House? And the public do not want a shutdown for a policy debate?

On ERA Dems are spineless cucks that don't deserve your support or votes because they can't get anything done while being minority they need wield powers of majority, but same time you need vote Dems so they can get majority even if they are most worthless political party ever to exist etc.

Threads about US politics on ERA give me so much whiplash because so erratic and illogical views on Democratic party.
 

Pwnz

Member
Oct 28, 2017
14,279
Places
Ok. It would still need to pass the Senate and be signed by the President.

Good gamesmanship, I guess. Trump has essentially made this whole thing a referendum on his wall, so the Democrats are going to play chicken and see who blinks first.

They can override the veto. Most Republicans dont actually give a fuck about the wall, ar least in Congress. Democrats could easily extend an olive branch on something they do care about.
 

Autodidact

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,729
On ERA Dems are spineless cucks that don't deserve your support or votes because they can't get anything done while being minority they need wield powers of majority, but same time you need vote Dems so they can get majority even if they are most worthless political party ever to exist etc.

Threads about US politics on ERA give me so much whiplash because so erratic and illogical views on Democratic party.
A lot of progressive young people grew up in the shadow of Fox News and conservative parents. They've internalized the rhetoric about Democrats.
 

TheRuralJuror

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,498
You guys seem to think that Republicans will suddenly roll over because the Dems have the House, and they'll play along with whatever fantasy scenario you've dreamt up.

Here's the thing: the opposition has their own priorities and their own plans, and their motivations aren't the same as yours. You think that the Republicans also view this as about the shutdown and making Trump look bad, and that they'll act accordingly, but they're not going to do what you think they should do, because that's not what this is about for them once the House is seated.

You think McConnell cares that the Repubs lost 40 seats? He's seen both chambers flip back and forth numerous times over the last two decades. Hell, there was a Democratic supermajority in the Senate just ten years ago. He knows it's a divided electorate. He knows the pendulum will swing back. He knows there's a core electorate for the Repubs that's still big enough to matter. He knows he has a massive propaganda arm in Fox News that'll gear up to oppose Nancy Pelosi, just like last time. He knows Schumer is a dish rag who'll compromise on anything to get a "win".

He knows that all that matters is the power that you have right now and using that power to get what you want. As long as he's Senate majority leader, and as long as there's a Republican in the White House, he's going to exercise every option available to him to extract concessions and launch the opening salvo in the new campaign of demonizing Pelosi and the Democratic House.

Some of you can spin any situation as a loss for the dems. They're perpetually fucked.