[
Other polls have shown Warren moving, both nationwide and in early primary/caucus states.
Fingers crossed.
Other polls have shown Warren moving, both nationwide and in early primary/caucus states.
Fingers crossed.
Single polls aren't newsworthy, and treating them as such will only drive you mad.
Other polls have shown Warren moving, both nationwide and in early primary/caucus states.
I can't wait to be driven mad by the New York Times needleSingle polls aren't newsworthy, and treating them as such will only drive you mad.
they already did, though.I'd be lying if I thought Americans would vote a women for president
The other big story from this poll is that Trump couldn't break 39% vs any of the top 4 Dem nominees they polled him against.I'd be lying if I thought Americans would vote a women for president
Isn't she from a fly over state lolI like Warren but I'd worry about how she would do in some rural/fly over states that Dems would need to perform a lot better in in 2016. This in part seems to be a lot of the appeal of Biden. Wonder if she'd need a helluva a VP on the ticket to make that up.
Here's a poll with Warren winning in Iowa:
How do I embed a tweet?
you put the link in the media tool, next to the image tool, then his "continue"
I'm a Bernie guy but I'd be fine, happy even, with a Warren presidency.
I like Warren but I'd worry about how she would do in some rural/fly over states that Dems would need to perform a lot better in in 2016. This in part seems to be a lot of the appeal of Biden. Wonder if she'd need a helluva a VP on the ticket to make that up.
I like Warren but I'd worry about how she would do in some rural/fly over states that Dems would need to perform a lot better in in 2016. This in part seems to be a lot of the appeal of Biden. Wonder if she'd need a helluva a VP on the ticket to make that up.
Doesn't she have high favorables among dems and independentsI'd be lying if I thought Americans would vote a women for president
Same with me, and I think most Bernie supporters love her too. Some days I actually think she would be a better president, she defentely knows about economic industries more, but Bernie is better are pointing out the underlying issues and showing the wounds that the economy has created. Drop back with Warren would be foriegn policy potentially.
Ultimately I want Bernie and Warren on the same ticket in whatever order.
You can't edit on twitter. You have to post corrections as a threaded tweet.dat immediate bernie typo that is still uncorrected in the original post and yet acknowledged
When I'm feeling blue about the state of the world/politics I look at this picture and feel a tad better about it all.
No one cares about that except the MAGA crowd.After the DNA blunder do people really think Warren has what it takes to beat Trump?
Well, yeah, because Trump's an incumbent and has had remarkably steady (dis)approval - including a hard, unyielding 52%+ that hate his guts.I thought Warren would Jeb! out and Kamala would walk away with the nomination tbh. It's still early though, especially those head to heads. Hillary was up 14 vs Trump on RCP this time in 2014, its a totally different race now though.
Compared to the gaffes of a majority of the runners, the DNA fiasco is a small blip on the radar by now. I'd wager the majority of the American public don't give a shit.After the DNA blunder do people really think Warren has what it takes to beat Trump?
The more Trump tries his hardest to derail the only thing keeping his approval ratings from cratering (the economy) the better Warren looks.After the DNA blunder do people really think Warren has what it takes to beat Trump?
....she's from a flyover state.I like Warren but I'd worry about how she would do in some rural/fly over states that Dems would need to perform a lot better in in 2016. This in part seems to be a lot of the appeal of Biden. Wonder if she'd need a helluva a VP on the ticket to make that up.
Absolutely.After the DNA blunder do people really think Warren has what it takes to beat Trump?
The true winning team