I can't figure out how someone could come to this conclusion. Have you actually seen either of these games?Absolutely terrible. The videos I've watched were terrible, too. Looks more like Revelations 2 than RE 2.
It makes sense to me, there was more backtracking to and in the Spencer mansion. RE2 moved locations a bit more frequently, and it seems that the remake is expanding on this.
IIRC Jill is completely passed out in the church during the events of RE2. A Carlos cameo would be more likely.Really Hoping we get a Jill, Nemesis, or Brad Cameo considering the Events of 2 & 3 pretty much intersect within the same vicinity for the most part. I would lose my shit if we got a hidden nemesis boss fight. Very wishful thinking though.
Imagine if we got a Konami renaissance.
They are just going to make it really really really fucking good so you will just want to replay it over and over.This game is gonna be great! I wonder what they did to enhance the replay value.
Absolutely terrible. The videos I've watched were terrible, too. Looks more like Revelations 2 than RE 2.
I can't figure out how someone could come to this conclusion. Have you actually seen either of these games?
It makes sense to me, there was more backtracking to and in the Spencer mansion. RE2 moved locations a bit more frequently, and it seems that the remake is expanding on this.
IIRC Jill is completely passed out in the church during the events of RE2. A Carlos cameo would be more likely.
Yea there's a fairly well established timeline. RE3 starts on either the 27th or 28th of September, Jill takes a hit from the Nemesis and is out for 3 days whilst Carlos is looking for a cure. She wakes up on Oct 1st and the game continues from there. RE2 is set entirely on the 29th, so Jill has already been and gone. I expect them to insert plenty of references into it though, such as holes in the wall where Nemesis busts thru to get to Jill, and I'm fairly certain Zombie Vickers will be there to kill after his encounter with Nemesis.I thought it was kinda all over the place if i remember correctly, but you could be right. It's all a blur to me at this point
now we have zombies that you don't even know if several headshots killed it or not
They say they know there's still many people who played the original fixed camera horror games and are impressed, and they haven't ruled out ever going back to the style yet, but they hope that users can experience this game with it's new perspective and come to love what they've done to realize horror from this perspective.
but it does function different than how it did in the original RE2. In the original RE2 the music would change at room changes or key events, while playing the original OST in this version the music changes depending on the situation.
Didn't he literally have a medieval torture chamber hidden in the RPD, does this imply it's going to go further than that?
Yea there's a fairly well established timeline. RE3 starts on either the 27th or 28th of September, Jill takes a hit from the Nemesis and is out for 3 days whilst Carlos is looking for a cure. She wakes up on Oct 1st and the game continues from there. RE2 is set entirely on the 29th, so Jill has already been and gone. I expect them to insert plenty of references into it though, such as holes in the wall where Nemesis busts thru to get to Jill, and I'm fairly certain Zombie Vickers will be there to kill after his encounter with Nemesis.
Why would RE3 be an expansion when the original is markedly different from 2 in the first place? They aren't building an entire game built around Nemesis (that would have to have almost revolutionary AI in this day and age) with a bunch of new areas as an expansion pack.
I think RE3 as an extensive expansion is do-able, but I can't see Capcom doing it. The Nemesis wouldn't need some crazy AI either, it's not gonna be a stealth game so he would really just boil down to being a frequent optional boss, just like he was in the original. I think they will be full steam ahead on Resi 8 after this comes out so it's not likely.Why do you think they wouldn't put a bunch of new areas in an expansion pack, when expansion packs are basically defined by taking the gameplay of the main game (sometimes with extra stuff) and setting it in entirely new areas? Uncharted: The Lost Legacy and the Witcher 3 expansions, from what I know, were set in totally new locations with no re-use at all. Nemesis would be fine if they prepare for making him by enhancing the AI of Birkin and Mr X to make them smarter and more Nemesis-like - he would be worth the extra work, as the main selling point of the expansion. RE3 could very well be done as an extensive $40 expansion - stuff like The Lost Legacy and Blood&Wine tend to rival a lot of normal games in length.
Part of the reason I think they might go this way is that redoing RE3 as its own $60 game might come across as a little content-light. RE2 has the Claire campaign, the Leon campaign, the Hunk and Tofu bonus mode, and whatever this mysterious playtime-increasing thing is that they're hinting at, not to mention the possibility of something like Mercenaries or Extreme Battle Mode. RE3 having nothing but a Jill campaign could be a little tough to market as a full game, even if that campaign really was more fully-featured than any of RE2's. It would make total sense as a $40 standalone though.
Why do you think they wouldn't put a bunch of new areas in an expansion pack, when expansion packs are basically defined by taking the gameplay of the main game (sometimes with extra stuff) and setting it in entirely new areas? Uncharted: The Lost Legacy and the Witcher 3 expansions, from what I know, were set in totally new locations with no re-use at all. Nemesis would be fine if they prepare for making him by enhancing the AI of Birkin and Mr X to make them smarter and more Nemesis-like - he would be worth the extra work, as the main selling point of the expansion. RE3 could very well be done as an extensive $40 expansion - stuff like The Lost Legacy and Blood&Wine tend to rival a lot of normal games in length.
Part of the reason I think they might go this way is that redoing RE3 as its own $60 game might come across as a little content-light. RE2 has the Claire campaign, the Leon campaign, the Hunk and Tofu bonus mode, and whatever this mysterious playtime-increasing thing is that they're hinting at, not to mention the possibility of something like Mercenaries or Extreme Battle Mode. RE3 having nothing but a Jill campaign could be a little tough to market as a full game, even if that campaign really was more fully-featured than any of RE2's. It would make total sense as a $40 standalone though.
Because Capcom would give the exact same thought and effort to reinventing 3 that they gave to 2, which is supposedly made of 60% new content as per Dusk Golem. I doubt it would be cheap enough to justify an expansion pack price even with asset reusage.Why do you think they wouldn't put a bunch of new areas in an expansion pack, when expansion packs are basically defined by taking the gameplay of the main game (sometimes with extra stuff) and setting it in entirely new areas? Uncharted: The Lost Legacy and the Witcher 3 expansions, from what I know, were set in totally new locations with no re-use at all. Nemesis would be fine if they prepare for making him by enhancing the AI of Birkin and Mr X to make them smarter and more Nemesis-like - he would be worth the extra work, as the main selling point of the expansion. RE3 could very well be done as an extensive $40 expansion - stuff like The Lost Legacy and Blood&Wine tend to rival a lot of normal games in length.
Part of the reason I think they might go this way is that redoing RE3 as its own $60 game might come across as a little content-light. RE2 has the Claire campaign, the Leon campaign, the Hunk and Tofu bonus mode, and whatever this mysterious playtime-increasing thing is that they're hinting at, not to mention the possibility of something like Mercenaries or Extreme Battle Mode. RE3 having nothing but a Jill campaign could be a little tough to market as a full game, even if that campaign really was more fully-featured than any of RE2's. It would make total sense as a $40 standalone though.
I doubt Capcom would just copy and paste the way Nemesis works from the original to the remake considering they're not even doing that with MINOR bosses in the 2 remake but okay.I think RE3 as an extensive expansion is do-able, but I can't see Capcom doing it. The Nemesis wouldn't need some crazy AI either, it's not gonna be a stealth game so he would really just boil down to being a frequent optional boss, just like he was in the original. I think they will be full steam ahead on Resi 8 after this comes out so it's not likely.
I don't know if they will bother tbh, it doesn't have the same resonance with fans that RE1 and RE2 had. Even now it's towards the bottom of most RE lists (not mine).I imagine they will eventually get around to a REMAK3, but I think it will be some years down the road.
Didn't he literally have a medieval torture chamber hidden in the RPD, does this imply it's going to go further than that?
I don't know if they will bother tbh, it doesn't have the same resonance with fans that RE1 and RE2 had. Even now it's towards the bottom of most RE lists (not mine).
By the time they will be getting around to it, RE4 will be 15 years old, I can see them just going straight onto that one.
Like, that's not at all what I was suggesting. I was saying that, in that scenario, he's not going to have some crazy advanced AI ala Alien Isolation. Just that he would be an elaborate version of a standard boss from the base game.I doubt Capcom would just copy and paste the way Nemesis works from the original to the remake considering they're not even doing that with MINOR bosses in the 2 remake but okay.
God I hope not. As much as I deeply love RE4, it has been released so many damn times that it needs time to breathe, that's why I hope they wait 5 or more years and then do RE3, that would probably drive people crazy for RE4 (also I can't believe how old that game is now jesus)
Like, that's not at all what I was suggesting. I was saying that, in that scenario, he's not going to have some crazy advanced AI ala Alien Isolation. Just that he would be an elaborate version of a standard boss from the base game.
Assuming the start making it in 2020, it probably won't be out till 2023, which will have been about 7 years after the last HD release 2 years ago. I don't see the problem with them tarting up RE4, but then I buy ever single version that they release.
Where they fuck is my Switch version of RE4 Capcom!
This could happen if they go ahead with a full separate release, which I hope they doas I love RE3 as much as RE2. When it comes down to it I'll take any kind of remake of it that I can get.Oh those RE4/5/ and 6 ports are def imminent. What would be pretty awesome is making nemesis way more dyanmic in some ways kinda similar to the A.I Director in left 4 Dead where each playthough will never be the same in regards to how nemesis reacts which in turn could add a more consistent form of fear with each playthrough since you'd now he's not so predictable (after your subsequent playthroughs)
Not a lot of people will agree with that, but I certainly do. CV is only behind REmake and RE4 for me. Love that game.they can do all the remake they want as long as they remake Code Veronica along the way.
Don't listen those critics RE team. She's perfect.-They have seen some of the divided response to Claire's new design, but they've worked hard on the new Claire and hope impressions will change as people see more of Claire in motion, being voiced, and her arc through the game.
Semi Open world would be better. Think Alien Isolation with Nemesis hunting for you in areas. That could be swell.RE3 remake seems likely I thought. Didn't Dusk say they had some pretty big plans for it ala open world raccoon city.
On topic can't wait for this. Looks so damn good!
Not a lot of people will agree with that, but I certainly do. CV is only behind REmake and RE4 for me. Love that game.
Still cant believe both look so good and come out just two months apart. Capgod is back.Looks and sounds like GOTY 2019. This and DMCV in the same year still feels surreal.
It's usually towards the bottom of most people's list of RE games, they would complain that whatever their favourite is isn't being remade first.The problems CV has (Steve, op knife, annoying placement of item boxes, getting stuck on bosses) would be easily fixed in a remake anyway so I don't know why people would complain. Remade Alfred laugh would be glorious
From the sounds of it, while there might not be Crimson Heads, there could be some G Virus shenanigans with these zombies if they can play dead. They must know a lot of us are going to go for the head, which makes me think head shots aren't going to be as reliable as we think. We saw bits of that before in Leon's demo.
All we got to see is the Birkin fight? She was jacked up on ammo too for the demo...so how did you reach the conclusion that it looks more like Rev2?
Not a lot of people will agree with that, but I certainly do. CV is only behind REmake and RE4 for me. Love that game.
If they were going to do it, it would be 3rd person so it's going to completely change anyway. The setting, music, story and atmosphere are what I loved about that game. It also had more of a sense of urgency than other RE games. Those could easily be adapted to a 3rd person game.I want a CV remake only for them to make it more playable for me. Rectify some things and enhance other situations. They can do it, they have the technology.
Is it a cycle though? The gap between the first and second REmakes is 17 years. To reiterate, I'd kill for a REmake 3, I just don't think there are any guarantees.We can't go through a cycle of remakes of the original RE games and not get to 3. I agree it doesn't have the same resonance as 1 or 2 and I think belongs firmly in the middle ground of RE games.. but, Nemesis. We have to see a modern update on the Nemesis monster which, quite frankly, could be terrifying.
I think they'll do it, and I think we'll get it reasonably quickly. In theory a lot of the groundwork for creating RE3 will already be present by the existence of REmake 2.
If they were going to do it, it would be 3rd person so it's going to completely change anyway. The setting, music, story and atmosphere are what I loved about that game. It also had more of a sense of urgency than other RE games. Those could easily be adapted to a 3rd person game.
I see people critizice the new Claire left and right, but no one ever points out that the new Leon looks like Leonardo DiCaprio fresh off the set of Titanic. They both look great.