They arent hard to find but they aint polluting the home screen eitherThey're on people's profiles if they choose. They're not hard to find. People just stick to gamerpics.
They arent hard to find but they aint polluting the home screen eitherThey're on people's profiles if they choose. They're not hard to find. People just stick to gamerpics.
Never suggested it was, I'm aware that the 'Avatar team' isn't the games team - but the fact that they have an avatar team at all - it is something that Microsoft HAVE a team for, something they have invested in, something they have been working on and supporting since they had Rare create them in 08 (Rare, a game team, making the avatars). The team who currently make avatars are at the end of the day just game devs who could develop games instead of avatars if allowed. Resources and funding and development costs and all that jazz. They have an avatar team and avatars but there was no one saying "oh no Xbox needs improved avatars"
but there ARE millions of Xbox gamers begging for new games. I just can't understand their priorities at all.
I hope there's lots of implementation into games like there was in 1vs100, and Keflings etc. Make them have a good purpose. Like I said, I feel like they lost their way a bit with them, and I really really hope they're back with some focus and for more than just cosmetic purposes and selling avatar gear in the store. And all the old stuff MUST be compatible - I have soooooo many outfits and stuff unlocked from games on my 360! I will be really upset if it isn't carried forward.
lol
Should they stop making consoles and focus on games?
What about services?
No need for a marketing team when you have no games.
Microsoft should just sell Xbox huh?
yet you tried derailing the thread with your first post.Game pass is very special service and it's another subject we don't need to discuss here.
There is nothing derailing , it was meaning i prefer MS to show what they are working on about games and showcase that instead of avatars i don't care so much.
Eurogamer cites The Verge as the source, which is pretty sad because it means they didn't even read the article they link.
There is nothing derailing , it was meaning i prefer MS to show what they are working on about games and showcase that instead of avatars i don't care so much.
I let people interpret how they want.
Agreed
Most underappreciated post in this thread.
How is that console wars?
It's my opinion and the reason why I changed from one console to another.
After watching them play the Jackbox Party Pack on Mixer a few months ago, I always thought a 1v100/Jackbox-like game with Mixer-integration is a must. You can advertise Mixer with it, let people login with their MS accounts, use the new Avatars and you have a Stream-friendly exclusive.
What's there not to like?
It's a great idea. Avatars need to be in social games. Such a missed opportunity.
And there is too much X360 games, not enough Xbox One games.
Halo 5 is not free on Game Pass you must pay another 15$ while it's a MS game. Forza games are not in game pass, Ori or CUp Head are not in game pass also.
Game pass is very special service and it's another subject we don't need to discuss here.
I was going to say Paw Patrol.
There is nothing derailing , it was meaning i prefer MS to show what they are working on about games and showcase that instead of avatars i don't care so much.
I let people interpret how they want.
Then why even enter a thread that's about avatars when you don't care about them?
Nope, by a dedicated avatars team.