I think so? all manufacturers seem to have different names for it. Most seem to support it.
Thanks, I think it's called Viera link for Panasonic.
Do I need to enable on the ps4 Pro setting too?
I think so? all manufacturers seem to have different names for it. Most seem to support it.
I'm looking at these 12 TF suggestions and I think I'm missing something.
I just got a vega 64 card which is approximately 12 TF. The thing uses 300W and weighs over 1 kilogram. It cost 3500 NOK (the equivalent of approx $400 including 25% vat).
If the consoles launch in 2020, that is in a bit over a year, how do we expect this to shrink down to a combined cpu/gpu chip and the whole package with mother board and hard drive at the same price?
Is the new 7nm process and/or architecture of navi _that_ much better?
I know the HBM2 on the vega is a big part of the cost but still it seems overly optimistic to me.
I would be happy if it happen though!
In theory Navi should be a generation ahead to Vega. I'm not an expert but why should be comparable to Vega?I'm looking at these 12 TF suggestions and I think I'm missing something.
I just got a vega 64 card which is approximately 12 TF. The thing uses 300W and weighs over 1 kilogram. It cost 3500 NOK (the equivalent of approx $400 including 25% vat).
If the consoles launch in 2020, that is in a bit over a year, how do we expect this to shrink down to a combined cpu/gpu chip and the whole package with mother board and hard drive at the same price?
Is the new 7nm process and/or architecture of navi _that_ much better?
I know the HBM2 on the vega is a big part of the cost but still it seems overly optimistic to me.
I would be happy if it happen though!
In theory Navi should be a generation ahead to Vega. I'm not an expert but why should be comparable to Vega?
It's different, HBM takes a lot of power alongside the Vega architecture and GCN being very power hungry.
APU version will have slower clocks and further power draw optimization via 7nm alongside overall Arch iimprovent
We can't comment on Navi because oficially we know nothing besides 7nm
I think so? all manufacturers seem to have different names for it. Most seem to support it.
This is the most positive thing you can say about that guy.Sometimes he really digs some interesting stuff out but it's crazy what he does with it.
On twitter and on a forum that doesn't exist anymore. But that is all from years ago ... I moved on because it isn't worth the time to deal with such people ...A lot? Then probably not on Twitter or I got unlucky because he just blocked me after one tweet.
I'm looking at these 12 TF suggestions and I think I'm missing something.
I just got a vega 64 card which is approximately 12 TF. The thing uses 300W and weighs over 1 kilogram. It cost 3500 NOK (the equivalent of approx $400 including 25% vat).
If the consoles launch in 2020, that is in a bit over a year, how do we expect this to shrink down to a combined cpu/gpu chip and the whole package with mother board and hard drive at the same price?
Is the new 7nm process and/or architecture of navi _that_ much better?
I know the HBM2 on the vega is a big part of the cost but still it seems overly optimistic to me.
I would be happy if it happen though!
For a lot of TV's including mine, the ps4 will turn on my TV, but when I put my ps4 into rest mode it does not turn off the TV.
I hope Sony fix this for the PS5.
(but it's cool my Pro turns on my TV now)
The best way to look at it is to consider Navi to be a super-charged Polaris card with the performance at around or better than Vega.
This essentially means less compute-specific hardware features, smaller size, more efficient and all the latest GPU tech that RTG may have worked on.
Vega even contains hardware for features that isn't being used, either due to issues with the hardware design or RTG being unable to code for it.
This will most likely be ripped out or fixed to improve performance.
For a lot of TV's including mine, the ps4 will turn on my TV, but when I put my ps4 into rest mode it does not turn off the TV.
I hope Sony fix this for the PS5.
(but it's cool my Pro turns on my TV now)
Why do you put this upon Sony? If you have the vaguest understanding of electronics, you should be able to understand that turning appliances off is a pretty challenge.
I have my pro hooked up to a Sony Bravia and the tvs remote works the menu for the ps4. God send for watching movies without killing the controllers battery
Just tried my Panasonic remote, and IT WORKS!!, very cool feature.
Sometimes he really digs some interesting stuff out but it's crazy what he does with it.
He probably gets little to none benefits from MS, maybe has MS stocks, is clearly an Xbox fan but goes far beyond any rationality.
I want to understand the motivation behind it or why and how people end up that way.
Size of the card does not matter at all, the die size does. The polaris die size is 232mm² vs Vega56/64 is at 486mm².Well, one of my computer has a polaris card (I think), RX 570. It's not exactly small either but it is not 1 kilo and doesn't use 300W.
It's about half the tflops though.
I would be pleasantly surprised if they managed to pull it off, especially in a combined cpu/gpu structure.
But even the nvidia rtx 2080 ti is "only" 13.5ish tflops.
It's all assumptions at this point but am I right in saying;I also think that if Sony goes 499 to compete with the Xbox pro than they are leaving themselves vulnerable to Xbox arcade at 300$. Yes the hardcore will pick the more expensive consoles but the masses will see a console at nearly half the price that plays the same games at a lower resolution.
Found it myself a couple months ago and I lost my shit, just awesome for watching movies. Wasn't sure if it only worked because it was a Sony tv. I assume Xbox do this too? Would be ironic if it didnt.
The best way to look at it is to consider Navi to be a super-charged Polaris card with the performance at around or better than Vega.
This essentially means less compute-specific hardware features, smaller size, more efficient and all the latest GPU tech that RTG may have worked on.
Vega even contains hardware for features that isn't being used, either due to issues with the hardware design or RTG being unable to code for it.
This will most likely be ripped out or fixed to improve performance.
Still, it is best to wait until GDC for more information or the Navi launch at end of Q2 or in Q3.
Yes that seams to be the general thought what will happen. And your right things rarely turn out like they are expected. Like your saying we don't know how much loseseither company is willing to take on up front on their consoles.It's all assumptions at this point but am I right in saying;
We assume Sony will make one sku next gen and MS two, a high & a lower spec machine.
Sony will target the $399 price point & effectively take the middle ground on power & price.
things rarely turn out how we expect them to but do we think both Microsoft & Sony would be happy with this scenario?
I don't think Sony would want to land too close to either end of the Xbox twins ( power wise) leaving the low or high end uncontested , although they could manoeuvre to take the middle ground (price wise) if on par with the Xbox pro.
It's hard to say how much either company is willing to lose if any to gain an advantage next gen
Feel free to share why you think AMD won't be able to make a ~10TF APU.The real answer is that people enjoy disappointment and don't want to be beholden to the laws of physics.
Feel free to share why you think AMD won't be able to make a ~10TF APU.
Cell was exotic and a pain in the ass to deal with, over-engineered and if I remember correctly they were to have two cell chips doing CPU and GPU.Comparison is a bit tricky though. This gen and on, it's basically a "level" playing field as they are pulling from the same vendor. So a year later their will be a clear linear progression. But PS3 was an exotic built from the ground up genuinely one of the kind beast. As opposed to the 360 which was a more PC based yet still customized system. It is apples and oranges. Hell, knowing what we know now, having the PS3 be as good as it was may have been a true marvel of engineering. They never even got Toshiba to make them the cell GPU they needed then they needed to scramble with Nvidia who screwed them over
Found it myself a couple months ago and I lost my shit, just awesome for watching movies. Wasn't sure if it only worked because it was a Sony tv. I assume Xbox do this too? Would be ironic if it didnt.
Ironic, in what way?
They are using different technologies for a similar result.
Of course Xbox can do it. I just mean it would be ironic since the og Xbox had an emphasis on multimedia
I have a Pro and an Apple TV hooked up to my Bravia. Having multiple devices with the HDMI link on doesn't play nice. I got issues where devices would turn on/off when I didn't intend. I had to choose to have the Apple TV setup with HDMI link.
I have a Pro and an Apple TV hooked up to my Bravia. Having multiple devices with the HDMI link on doesn't play nice. I got issues where devices would turn on/off when I didn't intend. I had to choose to have the Apple TV setup with HDMI link.
At 299 for Lockhart, 399 for ps5 and 499 for andaconda here's my predictions
Pessimistic
Lockhart- 6tf
Ps5-8tf
Andaconda-10tf
Optimistic
Lockhart-8tf
Ps5-10tf
Andaconda-12tf
I will be happy if the consoles are in that range.
Yeah...I've never understood this either.
I mean a couple of people seem to have close ties with Microsoft and they infer their next platform will be the most powerful next-generation. I don't understand how that can be conclusive since there's absolutely no relative reference to Sony.
So, you'd need to ask yourself 'Does this mean Sony isn't trying to design the most powerful platform?'.
I think Microsoft are more bullish about it. They came straight out of the gate saying their platform will be the most powerful while Sony are tight lipped, leaving it to be more guesswork on design vs cost. In these terms it doesn't really matter what Sony build because Microsoft will always be more powerful.
Of course Xbox can do it. I just mean it would be ironic since the og Xbox had an emphasis on multimedia
I think it's kind of silly to say that Sony would subsidize and Microsoft wouldn't. I think the other way around makes more sense. Microsoft sells more games per console and makes more money off individual customers than Sony does. That's been backed up zhuge.That assumes (apart from simplistic scaling of performance for price but that's fine for illustration) - that all three consoles use a similar pricing model
If for example Sony subsidise theirs more heavily, and MS don't take a loss on the high end because it's not designed to be a volume seller, then you could theoretically end up with ps5 and anaconda both being 499 machines, but Sony is selling for 399/449. Still way too many moving parts at the moment.
For a lot of TV's including mine, the ps4 will turn on my TV, but when I put my ps4 into rest mode it does not turn off the TV.
I hope Sony fix this for the PS5.
(but it's cool my Pro turns on my TV now)
I think it's kind of silly to say that Sony would subsidize and Microsoft wouldn't. I think the other way around makes more sense. Microsoft sells more games per console and makes more money off individual customers than Sony does. That's been backed up zhuge.
For now it's best to assume they will both take equal losses.
True it would probably be best to just say I expectJust an example but you're right. Point is it makes starlight comparisons difficult. You need to estimate cost of goods, then estimate actual selling price and positive/negative margin
Result is the simple 299/399/499 point prices become overlapping ranges of prices depending on what MS/Sony do
True, though most people are taking this in consideration.AMD can almost make whatever you want. But you're not a console maker with set cost and thermal limits
I think it's kind of silly to say that Sony would subsidize and Microsoft wouldn't. I think the other way around makes more sense. Microsoft sells more games per console and makes more money off individual customers than Sony does. That's been backed up zhuge.
For now it's best to assume they will both take equal losses.
If you want then both to turn off press the power button on the remote and it will also turn the ps4 offFor a lot of TV's including mine, the ps4 will turn on my TV, but when I put my ps4 into rest mode it does not turn off the TV.
I hope Sony fix this for the PS5.
(but it's cool my Pro turns on my TV now)
If you want then both to turn off press the power button on the remote and it will also turn the ps4 off
Standby. I don't think it's possible to make it turn off fully without editing the os on the ps4
Standby. I don't think it's possible to make it turn off fully without editing the os on the ps4
This is because you are looking at it all wrong. You should only look at PC hardware as a measurement and never as a representation of a consoles design. They are consoles for a reason.Well, one of my computer has a polaris card (I think), RX 570. It's not exactly small either but it is not 1 kilo and doesn't use 300W.
It's about half the tflops though.
I would be pleasantly surprised if they managed to pull it off, especially in a combined cpu/gpu structure.
But even the nvidia rtx 2080 ti is "only" 13.5ish tflops.
I thought the XBox X starts at 500?This is because you are looking at it all wrong. You should only look at PC hardware as a measurement and never as a representation of a consoles design. They are consoles for a reason.
Eg. The RX580 which is a 36CU 8GB 185W card (pretty much a PS4Pro GPU) cost $230. Yet it was put into a $399 console along with a CPU, HDD, BRD, PSU, Cooling, Case and Controller.
Yes.