I'm actually kind of interested in what games get shown to kick off next-gen. I need something that is gonna get me as hyped as the MGSV trailer did.
WOOOOOOAAAOOOOOOOH WOHOOOOOOOOAOAOAOAOOAH WO!
That's great to hear.
A similar line of questioning, will Xcloud require the newest Xbox or is MS planning to roll out its streaming service to be used without a box?
you're right, sorry — Scorpio was announced in June 2016 with a Holiday 2017 release. PS4 Pro was announced September 2016 & released November 2017.
But with their own manufacturing plans / lead times they had to know that Sony had something coming and that even if they announced it then Sony wasn't really in a position to change anything or relate another hardware revision that could challenge what they were going to do. Also like I said they were already being outsold 2:1 or more... so the risk for them was a lot less to announce details than I feel it is for them to announce details on next gen now... unless they are very, *very* confident in what they have.
Interesting stuff.
Do you believe the inclusion of the SSD (which was pretty surprising to most people I'd think) was related to this?
AMD or Nvidia flops?Estimates have varied. But, Kurzweil estimates the brain about 20 million billion FLOPS which equals 20 quadrillion FLOPS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Singularity_Is_Near
Damn, you found the answer. Congratulations and Chapeau!Estimates have varied. But, Kurzweil estimates the brain about 20 million billion FLOPS which equals 20 quadrillion FLOPS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Singularity_Is_Near
yeh I fat-fingered that, thanks for pointing it out.
And the funny thing is, in the end, regardless if the ps5 will have 8, 10, 12 or 30TF, god of war 2 will still look amazing on it :)
I'm actually kind of interested in what games get shown to kick off next-gen. I need something that is gonna get me as hyped as the MGSV trailer did.
WOOOOOOAAAOOOOOOOH WOHOOOOOOOOAOAOAOAOOAH WO!
Estimates have varied. But, Kurzweil estimates the brain about 20 million billion FLOPS which equals 20 quadrillion FLOPS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Singularity_Is_Near
Estimates have varied. But, Kurzweil estimates the brain about 20 million billion FLOPS which equals 20 quadrillion FLOPS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Singularity_Is_Near
That's 20 Yotta FLOPs.
The newest DOE super computer will be 1.5 Exa FLOPs.
However, the folks at the Official PlayStation Magazine were able to snatch an additional statement from a Sony spokesperson, which is as brief as it is interesting. Here's the quote, straight from the magazine (June 2019, issue 162): An ultra-high-speed SSD is the key to our next generation. Our vision is to make loading screens a thing of the past, enabling creators to build new and unique gameplay experiences.
That's 20 Yotta FLOPs.
The newest DOE super computer will be 1.5 Exa FLOPs.
Edit:
Or about 13.4 million times as powerful.
Yeah SSDs being a standard in the games consoles next gen is truly a generation leap.I think that both had to/will go with SSD. With higher performance machines you want to push more detail - bigger worlds, better textures, more sounds and more intricate geometry.
You have more memory on the new machines but assets have grown in size, draining the available memory just as quickly as before. We were already looking at considerable loading times running from hard disks. If you're loading more data (at least twice the current amount) at the same old HD speeds it would be unbearable for players.
If you don't make the jump to SSD for faster loading, can you take the risk that a competitor won't?
So SSDs for everyone!
So here is a small thing actually new - https://wccftech.com/sony-ultra-high-speed-ssd-key-to-our-next-gen
I get that SSD is going to be great for next gen consoles, but I must say that it seems a little odd for Sony to be acting like it is the entire key to things for them.
So what i'm Hearing is that there'll be more PS5 info within the Official PlayStation Magazine next month?
Lol, why would Sony do that given how that turned out for MS during the One's reveal?
because they know they won't lose their customers as easily as Microsoft did
It's going to define the experience. It will be agony to play previous gen consoles.So here is a small thing actually new - https://wccftech.com/sony-ultra-high-speed-ssd-key-to-our-next-gen
I get that SSD is going to be great for next gen consoles, but I must say that it seems a little odd for Sony to be acting like it is the entire key to things for them.
If I'm not mistaken MS announced 6TF GPU at E3 2016. Before the Pro was officially announced.
I think that both had to/will go with SSD. With higher performance machines you want to push more detail - bigger worlds, better textures, more sounds and more intricate geometry.
You have more memory on the new machines but assets have grown in size, draining the available memory just as quickly as before. We were already looking at considerable loading times running from hard disks. If you're loading more data (at least twice the current amount) at the same old HD speeds it would be unbearable for players.
If you don't make the jump to SSD for faster loading, can you take the risk that a competitor won't?
So SSDs for everyone!
So what i'm Hearing is that there'll be more PS5 info within the Official PlayStation Magazine next month?
They knew the specs anyway even if they did not leak at the time. Just like the know it this time, not exactly, but the ballpark the PS5 will be in. MS executives are very confident behind the scenes, they wouldn't be if they did not know what to expect from the competition.Yeah but the PS4 Pro dev documentation was leaked spring of that year. So everyone, including MS, knew what the specs were going to be. That's not the case now so I'd be very surprised if we got as much info at E3 as we got in the initial scorpio reveal.
The Xbone one S is not even remotely comparable to the ps4slim size, put the thing in this perspective what Sony engineers are? Divinity level? I just express my opinion about the matter and I'm not trying to change your convictions but I don't think talk as a MS PR could change the reality of the matter. I mean the Xbone S, for example, is more powerful of the OG for convenience reasons and not for tech engineering. Or about the X hardware goals, many times MS has claimed the true 4k stuff where indeed is a bit... " deceptive" release such message about the true hardware capability. But the matter is too wide and we are quite OT.Backwards Compatibility is not something that Sony or Nintendo bothered with. There is no money to be made by Microsoft in doing it, the fact that they have done it and still continue to do it is in itself phenomenal. Especially when you consider how happy people were when Cerny announced BC for the PS5 when it comes to this generation's games.
The Xbox One S was not a simple shrink of the base console. It runs faster, sports a UHD drive.
The Xbox One X in terms of approach to how hardware is handled is one of the best consoles ever designed, period. How silent it is, how much they are able to clock up, the Hovis method. They did not have FP16 or some other innovations that Cerny put into the PS4 Pro, some of which there is no bandwidth to really run. What they had was a console that was well designed, silent, and hit all the targets envisioned, one that more often than not hit 4K.
So here is a small thing actually new - https://wccftech.com/sony-ultra-high-speed-ssd-key-to-our-next-gen
I get that SSD is going to be great for next gen consoles, but I must say that it seems a little odd for Sony to be acting like it is the entire key to things for them.
This is why I think Lockhart is a smart move. Giving gamers access to these awesome new next-gen features (SSD, Raytracing) that define the next-gen consoles at a relatively cheap price is pretty exciting.It's going to define the experience. It will be agony to play previous gen consoles.
It's going to define the experience. It will be agony to play previous gen consoles.
This is why I think Lockhart is a smart move. Giving gamers access to these awesome new next-gen features (SSD, Raytracing) that define the next-gen consoles at a relatively cheap price is pretty exciting.
Given console is often lead platform, I bet a bunch of PC games will feel "broken" given how shoddy some PC ports already are.I wonder how will this influence PC gaming...i guess lots of casual PC gamers still don't have SSD in their machines.
No offence but MS was very confident in the Xbone era too. I could be wrong but I don't think they could know clearly what Sony will do. Just they use the common logic around the specs possible.They knew the specs anyway even if they did not leak at the time. Just like the know it this time, not exactly, but the ballpark the PS5 will be in. MS executives are very confident behind the scenes, they wouldn't be if they did not know what to expect from the competition.
It sounds like it should be between $299-$349.I wonder how cheap it can be though.
It sounds to me like there's a lot of fixed cost in making it next gen capable (CPU, RAM, SSD). You get some savings on some RAM, GPU, and cooling/power, but is it enough to add a huge price delta?
I think Lockhart is still going to be pricey.
No loading screens is a differentiation everyone can understand, without ever seeing so much as a hint of a next-gen game.but I must say that it seems a little odd for Sony to be acting like it is the entire key to things for them.
You've never met an executive before, have you?executives are very confident behind the scenes, they wouldn't be if they did not know what to expect from the competition.
They knew the specs anyway even if they did not leak at the time. Just like the know it this time, not exactly, but the ballpark the PS5 will be in. MS executives are very confident behind the scenes, they wouldn't be if they did not know what to expect from the competition.
MS executives are very confident behind the scenes, they wouldn't be if they did not know what to expect from the competition.
Well just a thing worry me a bit. I hope all those chats about the loading aren't a move to avoid to talk of some underpowered aspect of hardware compared the expectations. That give me some anxiety, I admit it.Effective marketing isn't just reeling off a feature list/spec sheet that most customers don't understand.
Better to highlight benefits and how they will improve things from the player's perspective rather than a roll call of company achievements and chest beating.
Plant the seed that next-gen it is going to be better than this one at least in one regard, leave them wanting more.
A "#4ThePlayers" approach which I'm sure Sony learned from taking their lumps on the PS3 where they thought they knew best.
As mundane as t may seem, if you really think about it an "ultra-fast" SSD represents the single or most obvious game changer with regards to next gen.So here is a small thing actually new - https://wccftech.com/sony-ultra-high-speed-ssd-key-to-our-next-gen
I get that SSD is going to be great for next gen consoles, but I must say that it seems a little odd for Sony to be acting like it is the entire key to things for them.
Well it sounds like they're aiming for $299, so that would seemingly be a $200 difference if Anaconda is $499. That's probably where the 4TF vs 12TF talk comes into play.I'd be shocked if it's 299.
I expect 349 and possibly 399 for Lockhart
Is $100 gap enough? Seems like the next Xbox Arcade or PS3 20GB
Given console is often lead platform, I bet a bunch of PC games will feel "broken" given how shoddy some PC ports already are.
Well just a thing worry me a bit. I hope those all chats about the loading isn't it a move to avoid to talk of the some underpowered aspect of hardware compared theexpectations. That give me some anxiety, I admit it.
lol
It will be pricier than a lot here think it will be for sure. But it will still be cheap. I can see PS5/Ana being $499 and Lockhart being $349-$399.I wonder how cheap it can be though.
It sounds to me like there's a lot of fixed cost in making it next gen capable (CPU, RAM, SSD). You get some savings on some RAM, GPU, and cooling/power, but is it enough to add a huge price delta?
I think Lockhart is still going to be pricey.
A $100 gap can be deceptive. Lockhart can cost $349 and have a BOM of $320. Ana could cost $499 but have a BOM of $650.I'd be shocked if it's 299.
I expect 349 and possibly 399 for Lockhart
Is $100 gap enough? Seems like the next Xbox Arcade or PS3 20GB
As mundane as t may seem, if you really think about it an "ultra-fast" SSD represents the single or most obvious game changer with regards to next gen.
...
Trust me, the second you hit start and 3-10 seconds later you are playing the game you will not even be able to imagine how you could sit through a 1min loading screen before. It's akin to that moment when you swap out your HDD for an SSD in our computer and suddenly notice everything happens faster.
I think it was one of the most obvious things to reveal to take the wind out of MS sails at E3.
Reveal what is expected, so you don't get pressed on things you'd rather not divulge yet.
So MS either have to go "oh yes, we're doing that too" which diminishes the impact or they have to one up you and reveal even more.