When his Twitter bio says the following I'll take this with the smallest grain of salt, literally:
Poking fun at salty fanboys, who will do amazing mental gymnastics to justify anything playstation
Poking fun at salty fanboys, who will do amazing mental gymnastics to justify anything playstation
Damn. Explains so much.The system they will put out under a one SKU strategy is unlikely to be the same one they would release under a two SKU strategy.
But they have had a while to think about it already.
No. These are big companies we are talking about here. They have teams of people who feed their families from thinking about and planning for nearly every eventuality you can imagine and how to work out it. Very little that these companies do is reactionary.
Poor Mr. Penello gets his last name misspelled all the time...I've seen like 5 different variations in the last week alone
I didn't saw anyone saying Lockhart was 100% canceled in the 5 OT's in the past 6 months.
If you can share the link, i appreciate.
It isn't his job to confirm everything he sees floating around.
I mean, it's not my job to confirm or deny any random piece of misinformation being spread online.
But...
Why not condense this further since you're using the same specs for PS5/Scarlett in all 3 categories anyway? 🤔Lockhart is gone it seems.
Which means I needed to update my prediction.
Guess what.
UPDATED PREDICTION
If people at the time don't know that information that they thought was correct and up to date was actually outdated, then yes obviously to them it's going to be correct information. I'm not sure why that's so hard to understand.Wait what? So people at that time not being aware that it was incorrect information just made it correct information?
I think he's just saying people knew, my man.No
And floating isn't confirmation.
Yeah?!
That's the point.
But again, no one said was cancelled until today.
5 OT's of people speculating about Lockhart and Anaconda, 6 months of discussion, no one appears denying the information.
But you're the first saying PS5 has RT hardware few hours after Xbox conference.
But again, it's not your job confirm or deny any information.
I'm fine with this
Thanks :)
So, taking into account that PS5 devkits might be stronger than Scarlet devkits, has anyone thought about this for a second, and would it make any sense:
Scarlet: 11 TFlops, less RAM: 399$
PS5: 12.6Tflops, more RAM: 499$
Maybe Sony will be aiming high (see PS3 gen) and MS decided to go middle ground like they did on 360 with a very balanced console for a lower and more enticing price point while not sacrificing too much so that they have close enough parity for all 3rd party games. Personally I think that'd be a smart business move as it's the perfect price point and is a good value. It also fits with the "most powerful console we've ever made" comments from Phil, as that would still be true, and it's be the best that they could achieve at that price point and fits with the rumours of Scarlet being less powerful.
At this point, it would be minor improvements. The core parts are set.
I never endorsed it either...after 6 months of discussion...wonder why that might be...No
And floating isn't confirmation.
Yeah?!
That's the point.
But again, no one said was cancelled until today.
5 OT's of people speculating about Lockhart and Anaconda, 6 months of discussion, no one appears denying the information.
But you're the first saying PS5 has RT hardware few hours after Xbox conference.
But again, it's not your job confirm or deny any information.
I'm fine with this
Thanks :)
Poor Mr. Penello gets his last name misspelled all the time...I've seen like 5 different variations in the last week alone
Legit thought it was Panela. You Portuguese speakers out there will get the joke.
I had a friend whose mother died of Panela, this isn't funny nor a joke. She was crossing the street and a car came and PA! NELA!Legit thought it was Panela. You Portuguese speakers out there will get the joke.
Finally aligned with Colbert on next gen specs.Lockhart is gone it seems.
Which means I needed to update my prediction.
Guess what.
UPDATED PREDICTION
I had a friend whose mother died of Panela, this isn't funny nor a joke. She was crossing the street and a car came and PA! NELA!
I don't think that qualifies as a reaction n this case. Being that the consoles are unreleased.They are not reacting to the competition but to the developers who with all indications were not happy at all with a two SKU approach. If they planned for two but upon seeing reaction changed it to one SKU, that is a reaction. But let's be clear, a good reaction. I would rather that decision than shoving an unwanted SKU down the throat of developers.
Lockhart is gone it seems.
Which means I needed to update my prediction.
Guess what.
UPDATED PREDICTION
Lockhart is gone it seems.
Which means I needed to update my prediction.
Guess what.
UPDATED PREDICTION
Matt implied Anaconda got neutered.With Lockhart gone, I wonder how that affects the development and price point of Anaconda.
Anaconda will certainly need to be scaled back to make yields more cost effective.With Lockhart gone, I wonder how that affects the development and price point of Anaconda.
I mean, it won't be neutered. Just not the "premium console in a 2 SKU strategy" kinda powerful.
Well It is indeed hard for me to understand something as dumb as that.If people at the time don't know that information that they thought was correct and up to date was actually outdated, then yes obviously to them it's going to be correct information. I'm not sure why that's so hard to understand.
Have you ever been waiting for some sort of delivery and you get given a specific time that it'll be at your house? If the delivery doesn't show up at that specific time, does that mean that the delivery people at the time of first giving you that information were lying to you and purposefully giving you fake information? No, of course not*. It just means plans change.
*Well, I guess some of them might, but I'm sure you get the idea.
I mean, it won't be neutered. Just not the "premium console in a 2 SKU strategy" kinda powerful.
I guess this is probably why they're not so sure about being the more "powerful console" anymore, more so than knowing what the PS5 is up to. They're probably targeting the same price class now, instead of Anaconda being definitely more expensive than PS5.
Neutered is far too strong a word. It's been scaled back
I'm sure they have been. But it's one of those puzzle pieces that clicked into place with people wondering why they stopped being absolutely positive they would be more powerful. It's an "ohhh that makes sense" moment.I'm not really clear here, there are some in here talking like teams are scrambling around at MS like ever since E3, when it seems it's being said this change in strategy wasn't even made this year, so certainly the development plans have been adjusted already.
Can you point that out
Sounds like it was shelved last year, so whatever affects it may have had have already been considered. We are way post reaction.With Lockhart gone, I wonder how that affects the development and price point of Anaconda.
Fact is xbots leaked a document and blocked out the Teraflops number since it us lower than PS5.
We're not gonna see a situation where one is more expensive than the other, no one will give away such an advantage, $499 for both.
Someone put a "Sony" over Van Damme's head, and this gif is ready for the PS5 reveal conference thread.
What he said.I mean, it won't be neutered. Just not the "premium console in a 2 SKU strategy" kinda powerful.
I guess this is probably why they're not so sure about being the more "powerful console" anymore, more so than knowing what the PS5 is up to. They're probably targeting the same price class now, instead of Anaconda being definitely more expensive than PS5.
Someone put a "Sony" over Van Damme's head, and this gif is ready for the PS5 reveal conference thread.
With Lockhart gone, I wonder how that affects the development and price point of Anaconda.
Well that is obvious.He said it won't be the same as if there were 2 SKUs .
Not sure how that means neutered but here we are .
I'll try to answer as I can, though I have only a layman's knowledge of silicon production.
I don't know the true etymology of "binning", but I've always assumed it was an analogy (or maybe an actual physical activity!) of separating dice into bins. It's driven by faults in the physical structure of supposedly identical chips, presumably caused by crystal defects, vapor deposition variability, etc. Some faults are so bad that they make functional blocks unusable. Some are less serious and can be made to work by adjusting the voltage of the current running through them. But overvolting or undervolting to accommodate the flaw may cause the rest of the chip to stop working, so there's a limit.
Silicon is expensive (I think I've heard estimates like $15k for a single 300mm wafer?). So you don't want to just throw away the chips with parts which don't work, or chips that need altered voltage. By designing an end product which uses the perfect chips, and another which uses partially disabled chips, you can still sell the defective parts. As long as the number of faulty CUs doesn't exceed the number you ignore anyway, you can use the chip. For example, Navi 5700XT uses all 20 WGPs/40 CUs, whereas Navi 5700 is the exact same chips but with 2 WGPs/4 CUs disabled.
As for power variability, a certain amount can be tolerated by normal power supplies, and fans can be driven at different speeds by software. The range covered is relatively small, but you don't have to customize each console's hardware for this. That's why different users' consoles can reach different temperatures or noise levels (due to cooling needs): they're drawing and dissipating different amounts of power. The Hovis Method widens the acceptable range, presumably by a significant amount.
I don't think specifics are known, or at least I haven't heard any. From what I do understand, One X has a bank of extra capacitors in the traces leading to the APU, so presumably turning these off or on for specific machines does basically what you say, "fingerprinting" the power to particular die needs. I'd wager the Hovis hardware itself is identical across all motherboards, with the profile of which caps to use stored in a profile.
Even if the testing is done with final boards rather than a rig (which I'm not sure about), I imagine they'd just demount the chip rather than discard the entire assembly. And consoles don't perform equally--for some definitions of "perform". During testing, the constant standard that's being checked against is "Can this chip operate at a specific clock with [x] amount of silicon active?" The amount of power necessary to make it operate is what's adjusted. So a specific PS4 may get less TF per watt, and by that sense perform worse...but it still hits the exact same TF number as its brethren.