What do you mean? Doesn't the XSX have USB C ports?
see I wonder not about the whole no loading time thing with the PS5
not because I don't think it will happen... it likely is the case that it will
I just wonder way into the end of the PS5 life cycle if said feature would still be a thing or if devs would use said SSD for other things
still beyond just the SSD other major boosts are happening like the CPU so maybe there won't ever be a time were they need that SSD for other things other then no load times
Errrrr????First party will push the SSD for other things and not only to load textures and geometry.
You build your message around being powerful if you're trying to convince your core base you're not going to deliver a stinker on price/performance like the original Xbox One did. That they have their priorities straight, that this is a powerful gaming machine. "Go ahead and get excited, we won't let you down." That's what their messaging reads like to me, and it's the only thing I'm certain of. Of course Microsoft believes they will have the most powerful box and want that out there, doesn't necessarily mean it's true tho; take it as gospel at your own peril. But tbh there's a lot of scary scenarios for Xbox here. Sony, frankly, has the advantage. This scenario you put forward, with Sony sandwiched between Xbox models, arguably makes the Lockheart look a lot less attractive, if Sony sought the best price/performance ratio. A goldilocks zone PS5 could simultaeneously make Lockheart look like a gigantic ripoff (1080p vs 4k) and thus make Series X look expensive as the de facto Xbox anyways. And if they release roughly equal boxes, at equal prices, Sony still has a lot of built-in advantages. But what you're not envisioning is a scenario where Microsoft believes Sony won't target the highest end price point/specs, and can pinch them in between two of their boxes like you suggest, but instead ends up with 2 boxes with lower performance because Sony aimed for the best specs. In other words, it's hard for Sony to get completely outmaneuvered without colossal fuckups and bad priorities. Impossible? No. Unlikely? Very much so.
Totally agree with you. I love the ps games. But man if the ps4 pro was just as silent as the xb1x it would be so much better.Please Sony make an silent console. I just played some PES 2020 and the noise coming from my PS4 Pro is insane.
People worshipped insiders in old country, and it was a pretty awful forum culture to behold, especially in the run-up to and launch window for this generation of consoles. Posters used to think famousmortimer was cool at one point, and we should never want to be in that position again.
Randy Pitchford is Dennis Dyack.
Dennis Dyack is Randy Pitchford.
Sony literally can't outmanouver them. You can't cheat physics and heat(and power draw) is a problem. Look at Series X. It's so bulky precisely to handle heat. What would Sony put inside to outmanouver them? Magical GPU at 16TF? Impossible.
There are two realistic scenarios right now. Either Sony is around the same power (+/- 10%), which makes the whole discussion pointless, as that will make hardware equal ground. Or PS5 is noticably weaker(9-10TF), but also cheaper(I can't imagine Sony screwing up so badly they end up with weaker device at same price).
If they're cheaper MS will market with Gamepass as a differentiator, which will nicely cover a lot of price difference(and I stand by what I said earlier - Gamepass will make for a best launch ever, with hundreds of titles available instantly on your new box) and push Lockhart for the masses(gamers will shell out money for better hardware anyway). If you think most people give rat's ass about 4K, I believe you will find yourself surprised. Lockhart as a cheap device(priced at $300-350) would then be the easiest way into next generation and a nice option for people who don't own a 4K tv.
If they're equally powerful and equally priced, Lockhart will be a nice undercut and hard to counter(price IS an issue for non-enthusiast market), while Scarlett will keep the gaming community happy as equal rival.
In both cases - they feel pretty safe. The reason why Phil doesn't talk direct numbers is twofold. First, they're likely not locked down yet. If they build that tower to handle heat, they must have left some headway for adjustments. Second - he cannot be sure what Sony has. He's just taunting them a bit, grabbing attention while not committing anything that he would have to retract in case of surprise(surprise being PS5 having 0.X TF more).
You build your message around being powerful if you're trying to convince your core base you're not going to deliver a stinker on price/performance like the original Xbox One did. That they have their priorities straight, that this is a powerful gaming machine. "Go ahead and get excited, we won't let you down." That's what their messaging reads like to me, and it's the only thing I'm certain of. Of course Microsoft believes they will have the most powerful box and want that out there, doesn't necessarily mean it's true tho; take it as gospel at your own peril. But tbh there's a lot of scary scenarios for Xbox here. Sony, frankly, has the advantage. This scenario you put forward, with Sony sandwiched between Xbox models, arguably makes the Lockheart look a lot less attractive, if Sony sought the best price/performance ratio. A goldilocks zone PS5 could simultaeneously make Lockheart look like a gigantic ripoff (1080p vs 4k) and thus make Series X look expensive as the de facto Xbox anyways. And if they release roughly equal boxes, at equal prices, Sony still has a lot of built-in advantages. But what you're not envisioning is a scenario where Microsoft believes Sony won't target the highest end price point/specs, and can pinch them in between two of their boxes like you suggest, but instead ends up with 2 boxes with lower performance because Sony aimed for the best specs. In other words, it's hard for Sony to get completely outmaneuvered without colossal fuckups and bad priorities. Impossible? No. Unlikely? Very much so.
It's literally, exactly what MS did last time. Microsoft renamed every standard part in their documentation to obfuscate their mundane origins. Albert Penello had his famous "We invented DirectX" rant.
MCM is the future for sure, another question is if MS/Sony will do a refresh this gen with MCM, it might be too expensive early on, im fucking dreading what Nvidia is gonna charge for their large MCM Hopper GPU.What about 10th generation consoles in 2027, how would they be able to offer a generational leap beyond PS5 and Xbox Series X? I don't think 5nm or 3nm alone, with monolithic chips will be enough to get there. So I think Chiplets or MCM will be a necessity, along with some type of memory other than GDDR.
At some point 2.5D or 3D chip stacking will be both necessary and feasible for consoles.
MCM is the future for sure, another question is if MS/Sony will do a refresh this gen with MCM, it might be too expensive early on, im fucking dreading what Nvidia is gonna charge for their large MCM Hopper GPU.
Sony literally can't outmanouver them. You can't cheat physics and heat(and power draw) is a problem. Look at Series X. It's so bulky precisely to handle heat. What would Sony put inside to outmanouver them? Magical GPU at 16TF? Impossible.
There are two realistic scenarios right now. Either Sony is around the same power (+/- 10%), which makes the whole discussion pointless, as that will make hardware equal ground. Or PS5 is noticably weaker(9-10TF), but also cheaper(I can't imagine Sony screwing up so badly they end up with weaker device at same price).
If they're cheaper MS will market with Gamepass as a differentiator, which will nicely cover a lot of price difference(and I stand by what I said earlier - Gamepass will make for a best launch ever, with hundreds of titles available instantly on your new box) and push Lockhart for the masses(gamers will shell out money for better hardware anyway). If you think most people give rat's ass about 4K, I believe you will find yourself surprised. Lockhart as a cheap device(priced at $300-350) would then be the easiest way into next generation and a nice option for people who don't own a 4K tv.
If they're equally powerful and equally priced, Lockhart will be a nice undercut and hard to counter(price IS an issue for non-enthusiast market), while Scarlett will keep the gaming community happy as equal rival.
In both cases - they feel pretty safe. The reason why Phil doesn't talk direct numbers is twofold. First, they're likely not locked down yet. If they build that tower to handle heat, they must have left some headway for adjustments. Second - he cannot be sure what Sony has. He's just taunting them a bit, grabbing attention while not committing anything that he would have to retract in case of surprise(surprise being PS5 having 0.X TF more).
Klee has the spec sheet and still stands by his threadmarks.
Unless there's a twist on the horizon, the TF debate has ended.
Sony literally can't outmanouver them. You can't cheat physics and heat(and power draw) is a problem. Look at Series X. It's so bulky precisely to handle heat. What would Sony put inside to outmanouver them? Magical GPU at 16TF? Impossible.
There are two realistic scenarios right now. Either Sony is around the same power (+/- 10%), which makes the whole discussion pointless, as that will make hardware equal ground. Or PS5 is noticably weaker(9-10TF), but also cheaper(I can't imagine Sony screwing up so badly they end up with weaker device at same price).
If they're cheaper MS will market with Gamepass as a differentiator, which will nicely cover a lot of price difference(and I stand by what I said earlier - Gamepass will make for a best launch ever, with hundreds of titles available instantly on your new box) and push Lockhart for the masses(gamers will shell out money for better hardware anyway). If you think most people give rat's ass about 4K, I believe you will find yourself surprised. Lockhart as a cheap device(priced at $300-350) would then be the easiest way into next generation and a nice option for people who don't own a 4K tv.
If they're equally powerful and equally priced, Lockhart will be a nice undercut and hard to counter(price IS an issue for non-enthusiast market), while Scarlett will keep the gaming community happy as equal rival.
In both cases - they feel pretty safe. The reason why Phil doesn't talk direct numbers is twofold. First, they're likely not locked down yet. If they build that tower to handle heat, they must have left some headway for adjustments. Second - he cannot be sure what Sony has. He's just taunting them a bit, grabbing attention while not committing anything that he would have to retract in case of surprise(surprise being PS5 having 0.X TF more).
How would this even be possible? Unless ms has some garbage like kinect in the box or an overly expensive top tier ssd. Either sony is significantly weaker ($100 less) or they're even in power.That's a reasonable analysis, if somewhat slanted in MS favour. For instance, if Sony can release a console that is $100 cheaper than the X withing reasonable touching distance say 11 tf, and say $100 more expensive than Lockheart.
That thing that all Naughty Dog games have.
If they're cheaper MS will market with Gamepass as a differentiator, which will nicely cover a lot of price difference(and I stand by what I said earlier - Gamepass will make for a best launch ever, with hundreds of titles available instantly on your new box) and push Lockhart for the masses(gamers will shell out money for better hardware anyway). If you think most people give rat's ass about 4K, I believe you will find yourself surprised. Lockhart as a cheap device(priced at $300-350) would then be the easiest way into next generation and a nice option for people who don't own a 4K tv.
I do think it's Sony's game to lose, and that the prices and value-per-tflop will be an issue moreso than the absolute TFLOP number.
that it would be the easiest thing for devs if the consoles were identical most likely
Just reads like a summary of recent discussion here. Also 3.4 GHz for XSX CPU? Isn't it either 3.5 or 3.6?More Pastebin fun :)
- Latest info on ps5/xsx:
- - Performance is around the same for both, with a small advantage for PS5 (which won't make much of a difference in the end, imo)
- - ps5 ~13TF / xsx ~12TF
- - Both use GDDR6, no, there's no HBM2 going on.
- - Cpu clock is 3.2Ghz for PS5 and 3.4Ghz for XSX, both have a very low power standby mode
- - Current PS5 devkits have the GPU running a little over 2Ghz, XSX @ 1.6 or 1.7Ghz
- - PS5 is supposed to have 24GB for retail, XSX at the moment is 16GB, not sure if that's set though
- - PS5 SSD 4.5GB/s, XSX 2GB/s, both 1TB
- - Both use TSMC's EUV/7nm+.
- More people will be reporting this in the next few weeks. Info has been out for a while now.
Yes, that is correct.
More Pastebin fun :)
- Latest info on ps5/xsx:
- - Performance is around the same for both, with a small advantage for PS5 (which won't make much of a difference in the end, imo)
- - ps5 ~13TF / xsx ~12TF
- - Both use GDDR6, no, there's no HBM2 going on.
- - Cpu clock is 3.2Ghz for PS5 and 3.4Ghz for XSX, both have a very low power standby mode
- - Current PS5 devkits have the GPU running a little over 2Ghz, XSX @ 1.6 or 1.7Ghz
- - PS5 is supposed to have 24GB for retail, XSX at the moment is 16GB, not sure if that's set though
- - PS5 SSD 4.5GB/s, XSX 2GB/s, both 1TB
- - Both use TSMC's EUV/7nm+.
- More people will be reporting this in the next few weeks. Info has been out for a while now.
The more the man talks, I can't tell what's fucking BS and what's actual info. Is he saying that he is not impressed with next gen HW and that there is a notable performance discrepancy between the two?
Fucking guy.
I raise you a pastebin from 11/17/2019, weeks before WindowsCentral leaks, Xsx reveal...
I raise you a pastebin from 11/17/2019, weeks before WindowsCentral leaks, Xsx reveal...
We know one part is possibly false.I raise you a pastebin from 11/17/2019, weeks before WindowsCentral leaks, Xsx reveal...
We know one part is possibly false.
Devs knew it was 12 teraflops.
So, it sounds incredulous to me when some folks decide to cast their vote of confidence for one side over another.
I would like to know why Prospero has been reported as PS5 dev kit but no mention from Komachi.
Why not ask KOMACHI on twitter? You should be safe.I would like to know why Prospero has been reported as PS5 dev kit but no mention from Komachi.