So what you're telling is Pokemon Shield is delayed while Pokemon Sword isn't? \z
So what you're telling is Pokemon Shield is delayed while Pokemon Sword isn't? \z
But FE already was!
Team Shield <3So what you're telling is Pokemon Shield is delayed while Pokemon Sword isn't? \z
Don't yield, back SHIELD!
Mario Maker 2 should be enough proof you can hear nothing about a game and then BOOM 4 months later it drops.
Especially a game like Luigi and animal crossing. We already know the basic elements, we don't need to know every single little detail before release. They can easily cover enough through directs and E3
My guess is you see AC in September, Luigi in October, Pokémon in November and Zelda in December.
Labo VR is proof of that too. We still haven't actually seen any of it yet it launches in about a month.
Labo VR is a very minor game that I doubt Nintendo cares about.
Animal Crossing would probably get a ton of other EPD support to get out this year if it's starting to look like it'll miss 2019.
Or they'll just release it in December and add the missing content they planned later if worst comes to worst.
Mario Maker 2 should be enough proof you can hear nothing about a game and then BOOM 4 months later it drops.
Especially a game like Luigi and animal crossing. We already know the basic elements, we don't need to know every single little detail before release. They can easily cover enough through directs and E3
My guess is you see AC in September, Luigi in October, Pokémon in November and Zelda in December.
New Monster Hunter would be too close to Iceborne's fall window. Either Capcom surprises us and announces a Monster Hunter Switch game for a spring-summer window or they tease it now but wait until next year. Also, if Nintendo is smart, they'd try to put further distance between DQXI and Pokemon.Don't forget, games like Marvel Ultimate Alliance 3, Dragon Quest XI and Daemon X Machina also are Nintendo published games. Nintendo would prepare a release schedule with them in mind too.
My guesses for first party schedule:
Marvel UA3 - Early August
Astral Chain - August 30th, this one was confirmed
Animal Crossing - mid September
Switch Mini - Around same time with AC
Luigi's Manison 3 - Early October
Dragon Quest XI - Late October
Daemon X Machina - Early November
Pokémon Sword & Shield - Late November
Pikmin 3 Remaster - Early December
Link's Awakening - Holiday Season
Only two games rumored but not confirmed could also be part of 2019 fall schedule: Retro's project and "Revived Project". If both are real, I expect them to be revealed at E3 and slated to release for early 2020 dates.
My guesses for third party fall 2019 schedule. It's worth nothing that we know absolutely nothing about third party games of second half of 2019 except NISA's niche stuff (we can totally ignore them, Alliance Alive was a 3DS game with DS visuals for heavens sake)
Spyro - August
Persona 5 - October
Monster Hunter Next - November
Dragon Ball RPG - December
Fallout 3 or New Vegas Remaster (this was kinda leaked) - October
XCOM 2 port - November
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 remaster - November (I still believe in NateDrake)
A big Ubisoft game (possibly a port) - October
A big Square game (Kingdom Hearts 1.5+2.5 makes the most sense) - November
More Capcom ports (Maybe RE5, DMC4 or USF4) - September and October
Don't forget, games like Marvel Ultimate Alliance 3, Dragon Quest XI and Daemon X Machina also are Nintendo published games. Nintendo would prepare a release schedule with them in mind too.
My guesses for first party schedule:
Marvel UA3 - Early August
Astral Chain - August 30th, this one was confirmed
Animal Crossing - mid September
Switch Mini - Around same time with AC
Luigi's Manison 3 - Early October
Dragon Quest XI - Late October
Daemon X Machina - Early November
Pokémon Sword & Shield - Late November
Pikmin 3 Remaster - Early December
Link's Awakening - Holiday Season
New Monster Hunter would be too close to Iceborne's fall window. Either Capcom surprises us and announces a Monster Hunter Switch game for a spring-summer window or they tease it now but wait until next year. Also, if Nintendo is smart, they'd try to put further distance between DQXI and Pokemon.
I hope so. It'd be nice to have a Switch Monster Hunter with the QoL improvements of MHW.Monster Hunter Next seems pretty much real with all the hints from producers. If it is, it's being made with assistance with Nintendo, like previous entries (possibly published in Europe by Nintendo). Releasing alongside of Iceborne wold not be a problem for both of them as it would be a completely different game for completely different audience.
You'd think that, but DQXI's numbers on PS4 were softer than Square Enix was hoping for, probably because they released like a week before Spider-Man, and Pokemon is even closer to DQXI than Spider-Man is. Both are the latest entries in long-running turn-based JRPG series. Dragon Quest is big enough in Japan to survive, if only by a smidge, but Pokemon would eat its lunch everywhere else.DQ11 and Pokémon do not need far away release dates, different genres. I don't think Pokémon would eat DQ's lunch.
Teased by the director of the previous portable Monster Hunter games, mentioned by the 4chan(?) post that kind of predicted MHW, David Gibson alluded to it on TwitterWhere is this Monster Hunter Switch/Next stuff coming from? Capcom has yet to support Switch with anything new other than MM11 (?) - I expect nothing at this point.
What if Capcom didn't have games prepared for the switch because they thought it would flop? So all they can do is bring what titles are feasible (last gen ports and less-demanding games like MM or DD:DA) until they can reveal their new titles for the switch.Where is this Monster Hunter Switch/Next stuff coming from? Capcom has yet to support Switch with anything new other than MM11 (?) - I expect nothing at this point.
the director of the Portable/Generations games is teasing a new game. if there's a MH for Switch, it would be from him and not the main teamsWhere is this Monster Hunter Switch/Next stuff coming from? Capcom has yet to support Switch with anything new other than MM11 (?) - I expect nothing at this point.
What if Capcom didn't have games prepared for the switch because they thought it would flop? So all they can do is bring what titles are feasible (last gen ports and less-demanding games like MM or DD:DA) until they can reveal their new titles for the switch.
the director of the Portable/Generations games is teasing a new game. if there's a MH for Switch, it would be from him and not the main teams
Have Capcom said anything about this? I could've sworn I read an article about RE Engine being Switch compatible.I think the main barrier for Capcom support on Switch is the RE Engine. If they are able to get it working on Switch, then we'll start seeing a lot more Capcom support.
They said they were working on it back in 2017, but their silence since then makes me think that they couldn't get it to work.Have Capcom said anything about this? I could've sworn I read an article about RE Engine being Switch compatible.
The thread on "we may port DMC5 if Dragons Dogma sells well" soured my mood. I'll change my tune if we see something at e3.
I think that RE7 being cloud only is a sign that they can't get it working, or just aren't interested in making the effort.Have Capcom said anything about this? I could've sworn I read an article about RE Engine being Switch compatible.
Yep. Third-parties that jumped in with the Wii U got burned hard. The abysmal sales of third-parties on Wii U even spooked Ubisoft into thinking that the Switch's audience wouldn't care about their core franchises like Assassin's Creed.They are kinda right. Biggest problem with third parties that they don't understand what's going on with Switch.
They fail to identify the userbase. Switch sells like crazy, even faster than Wii. But casual audience and children are no longer there, then who is buying all those Switches? Nintendo's breakdown on the userbase revealed that 80% of them are male aged 19-26. To third parties that was, like, impossible. That audience only cares for core games more than colorful games of Nintendo. Maybe... Switch owners DO care for core games? Only one way to find out: testing the waters with "test" games. That's exactly what all of them are doing: trying to find out who we are and what do we like. Square seems to think we are bunch of nostalgia nuts and brought Octopath. Namco "tested" the waters with Xenoverse 2 if we care about anime fighters or not (turns out we did so they awarded us with DBFZ). Capcom has yet to do one of those "tests" all of their Switch support were "retro" kind of games. Dragon's Dogma is s first for them, a last gen "serious" game port. Sales of Dragon's Dogma really will tell a lot about us.
They said they were working on it back in 2017, but their silence since then makes me think that they couldn't get it to work.
they're literally Monster Hunter but with slightly different content. the second team made the portable games (Freedom/Unite/Portable/Generations). they're kinda adaptations of the console games, with the Generations games being "best of" of sorts. the expectation here is that whatever the portable team is making, it will be an adaptation of World in some way.Interesting - MH is foreign to me, but seeing as you're saying the generations games aren't "main" games, are they typically any good?
Any engine can be ported. It's a matter of them not wanting to spend the money to do it. They figure they can get by with old ports as their only Switch support and they're probably right.
Ehhh, Nintendo already has a good relationship with Platinum, so I think Nintendo would rather go to Platinum and throw some exclusivity money at them if they ever feel that their platform needs another character action game. The Switch could use some more horror, though.I think Nintendo definitely wants something like DMC5 on Switch.
yeah, the first five months of 2019 are pretty sleepy but from June onward I'm in a lot of troubleWhat a fun year this is turning out to be. Basically from the release of Mario Maker through the end of the year, we are seeing 2017-levels of release frequency, if not better.
If Nintendo wants those modern games on Switch, they would aid Capcom financially to bring the engine to Switch. Don't forget, it's not the first time Nintendo did this, bringing Resident Evil to GC and MH to 3DS were examples how Nintendo and Capcom could become good partners (money is always involved). And I think Nintendo definitely wants something like DMC5 on Switch.
Like Bayonetta 3?And I think Nintendo definitely wants something like DMC5 on Switch.
Considering Nintendo stopped publishing/distributing Capcom's games in Europe I think it's safe to say they have no interest in shelling out for Capcom support.
The ship has sailed, the two companies have gone their separate ways.
Wait how do we know that Nintendo asked for DOOM and DiabloI don't know why but people are using that same comment on Nintendo's relationship with any company. No, all ships are still at the bay, Capcom has yet to have a big project for Switch for Nintendo to publish/distribute. Not just Capcom, all other publishers are still playing safe with Switch. None of them has brought huge names to the platform except for those Nintendo specifically asked for (Doom, Diablo, etc).
We know absolutely nothing about third party future of Switch. It's like uncharted waters, we have nothing but NISA's niche titles beyond June. And it's almost impossible to predict what could any third party bring to Switch, that includes Capcom. But if I have to guess, they'd definitely bring something from this gen if it was made possible. No way they're "done" with Switch.
Nintendo already has 2 with a third coming. Nintendo doesn't give a shit. they can want Capcom's output on switch, but they're sure as hell aren't gonna pay for it. whatever partnership they had has since ended, as we can see that from Nintendo not bothering to support Capcom releases anymoreIf Nintendo wants those modern games on Switch, they would aid Capcom financially to bring the engine to Switch. Don't forget, it's not the first time Nintendo did this, bringing Resident Evil to GC and MH to 3DS were examples how Nintendo and Capcom could become good partners (money is always involved). And I think Nintendo definitely wants something like DMC5 on Switch.
Oh, definitely. Bethesda didn't start supporting the Switch out of nowhere. I think DOOM Eternal was of their own accord, though.We don't, Nintendo never discloses that kinda stuff. It's just obvious, like Bethesda starts supporting Nintendo out of nowhere and Diablo 3 getting bundles etc. Similarly Resident Evil deal on GC and Monster Hunter deal on 3DS. Everybody knew they existed despite the fact that there wasn't any official word from either side.
Nintendo already has 2 with a third coming. Nintendo doesn't give a shit. they can want Capcom's output on switch, but they're sure as hell aren't gonna pay for it. whatever partnership they had has since ended, as we can see that from Nintendo not bothering to support Capcom releases anymore
None of this is obvious. It's pure conjecture on your part. Bethesda brought their biggest games, Fallout aside. That's itWe don't, Nintendo never discloses that kinda stuff. It's just obvious, like Bethesda starts supporting Nintendo out of nowhere and Diablo 3 getting bundles etc. Similarly Resident Evil deal on GC and Monster Hunter deal on 3DS. Everybody knew they existed despite the fact that there wasn't any official word from either side.
Is it Monster Hunter?Just to be clear, one of the games that i was talking about being revealed in March got hinted and not fully revealed.
I think its a winter 2019/ Q1 2020 game so it should be fully revealed on a later date.
So, what could that be?Just to be clear, one of the games that i was talking about being revealed in March got hinted and not fully revealed.
Just to be clear, one of the games that i was talking about being revealed in March got hinted and not fully revealed.
I think its a winter 2019/ Q1 2020 game so it should be fully revealed on a later date.
Monster HunterJust to be clear, one of the games that i was talking about being revealed in March got hinted and not fully revealed.
I think its a winter 2019/ Q1 2020 game so it should be fully revealed on a later date.
Just to be clear, one of the games that i was talking about being revealed in March got hinted and not fully revealed.
I think its a winter 2019/ Q1 2020 game so it should be fully revealed on a later date.
Ride ain't over yetJust to be clear, one of the games that i was talking about being revealed in March got hinted and not fully revealed.
I think its a winter 2019/ Q1 2020 game so it should be fully revealed on a later date.