I'd kill for that but it doesn't seem to be possible. Ever.
There's nothing special about the game, period. It's a heavily average platformer, only standing out because it was a rare 3D platformer on a platform that never saw them.
Coming off something like Mario Odyssey, Switch owners will very quickly understand just how good they've had it with 3D Mario. The quality is nowhere near.
Cuphead isn't owned by Microsoft. Ports are doable if the devs will it
Didn't one of the devs here say a port of Cuphead would never happen ?Cuphead isn't owned by Microsoft. Ports are doable if the devs will it
they might have signed away console exclusivity rights, so I guess a new edition would be what it would take or somethingDidn't one of the devs here say a port of Cuphead would never happen ?
I'm gonna assume they'd need to pull a "Cuphead Deluxe Edition" because they can't just port the base game itself to other platforms for legal reasons.
well there is that DLC coming out at some point so we'll see.they might have signed away console exclusivity rights, so I guess a new edition would be what it would take or something
Haha why you think they are on a shopping spree??I can see it, Microsoft doesn't seem as overtly protective of their exclusives as Nintendo and Sony are.
So is Minecraft
I can see it, Microsoft doesn't seem as overtly protective of their exclusives as Nintendo and Sony are.
Of acourse they are.. it is a misinformed comment.Then why is Rare Replay is still exclusive to the Microsoft platform? Barring Minecraft, they are protective of their exclusives if they own the IP.
Super Lucky's Tale isn't a Microsoft IP.Then why is Rare Replay is still exclusive to the Microsoft platform? Barring Minecraft, they are protective of their exclusives if they own the IP.
Ori is owned by MS, just not the studio (moon studios).Honestly with Ms. Splosion Man on Switch, any MS-published exclusive not owned by them is a possibility. Including Cuphead and Ori.
Yeah this was my experience as well. Gave it a try on Xbox Game Pass after hearing good things about it, but everything felt so ... average. Not bad, just... average.
Microsoft have released banjo games for Nintendo handhelds in the past. They really aren't as protective of their properties as the other companies. They are more willing to share a few of them just not all of them.Super Lucky's Tale isn't a Microsoft IP.
It doesn't mean Halo Infinite is coming to the Switch.
"2019 PLAYFUL, Corp. Super Lucky's Tale is a registered trademarks of Playful, Corp. in the U.S. and other countries.As far as them not owning the IP to SLT, idk about that. I'm pretty sure I heard that they did buy it and I don't see any articles that says they don't.
Haha why you think they are on a shopping spree??
Of acourse they are protective. However, they might not own the IP to Lucky. It is okay.
Of course they're not going to start releasing Halo on the PS4 or Gears on the Switch but I said overtly protective, not just protective by itself. When compared to their Japanese counterparts they just aren't as explicit in how they speak about exclusivity or with their IPs so something like this wouldn't be anything particularly unusual.
I think that's changing going forward. MS wants to ensure they own every single IP going forward.
Would have loved to have had this on Switch instead of Xbox to avoid the achievement grind.
Oh well.
Great little game. Solid 7/10 platformer unfairly judged by a dumb review by a journalist I actually really like in Ryan McCaffrey. "This game isn't Super Mario Odyssey....5/10". Just....no. Ryan should clearly have not reviewed this game so close to Odyssey because it tainted the entire review.
interesting, i didn't think microsoft would allow a game of theirs to come to switch (other than minecraft but that's minecraft)
from what i've seen this one doesn't look like anything special, but it's still cool for those who want more 3d platformers on switch
edit: or maybe microsoft just acted as the publisher?
"2019 PLAYFUL, Corp. Super Lucky's Tale is a registered trademarks of Playful, Corp. in the U.S. and other countries.
All other trademarks and logos belong to their respective owners. All rights reserved."
MS is a 3rd party for Nintendo currently, iirc Phi says Minecraft isn't the end of that partnership.Isn't Microsoft the publisher though? I'm all for it, as a matter of fact I would want all RARE (just RARE) games going to switch. I think Microsoft is leaving money on the table by not sharing. There may be as many Nintendo "RARE" fans as XBOX "RARE" fans so why NOT?
they just published it, they don't own it, nor does it seem like there's an exclusivity deal.Isn't Microsoft the publisher though? I'm all for it, as a matter of fact I would want all RARE (just RARE) games going to switch. I think Microsoft is leaving money on the table by not sharing. There may be as many Nintendo "RARE" fans as XBOX "RARE" fans so why NOT?
at the bottom of the game's website:Where did you find the quoted info that shows the trademark is registered to Playful?
Maybe I made the mistake of trying it just after Spyro, but yeah I did not get on with this game at all.Tried this with Game Pass and it couldn't hold my interest past the first hour.