the biggest problem is that people kept saying pro and mini instead of using the correct rumor names of
"Cheaper" and "enhanced" units
I think WSJ has lots of faults here.
Words like 'avid gamers' and 'their designs are different from the original and you'd be surprised'.
What is so surprising about the Switch lite, and what is so surprising about an enhanced model that's just updated components of the interiors?
For Switch lite, WSJ further mentioned 'You would be wrong to think the other is just a cheap alternative that looks very similar to some past hand-held machines, say, Sony's PlayStation Vita', but the Switch lite is really just a larger vita, gimmick-free and straight to the point.