This was already linked earlier in the thread but it's pertinent to the discussion from eBay's perspective. Whether it's technically considered 'illegal' would fall under the country I assume.
The above could certainly be true.eBay was acting on an allegedly false claim from Nintendo, that the Switch in question was violating Nintendo's IP.
eBay wouldn't be at fault here for taking Nintendo's agent at its word, but Nintendo could be on the hook, as I originally stated. That's why I said I would start with a C&D to Nintendo's agent (would probably include a demand for a retraction of the false claim), and the follow-up step would be small claims.
I'm assuming OP is in the US. If OP simply stated that the Switch was a system that could be hacked, it wouldn't fall under eBay policy. If OP advertised that the Switch could be hacked and you should buy it because you could use it to get FREE GAMES that would fall under eBay policy.
Key here is that OP's listing wasn't taken down because of the above policy. OP's listing was taken down because Nintendo's agent made a claim that it was infringing Nintendo's IP (a direct claim that OP was violating the law).
It is those actions that could make a tortious interference cause of action viable, depending on the state that the OP lives in.
Advertising as moddable shouldn't matter, as they have no more standing to request takedowns of listings that say the system is moddable than they do listings that don't say it. It's not a 'conspiracy theory'.
TOS prevents you from selling modded devices, not devices that COULD be modded...which is pretty much every device.The links to eBay's TOS in this thread suggest that is more up for debate than you are suggesting. Regardless, my post was not about that, but about you suggesting that this was done solely with the intention of preventing more people from selling their consoles used. There is no evidence of that.
It is against Nintendo's user policies to modify the hardware in any way for any purpose.
Cool, still not illegal by law. Nor is playing bought games emulated, for instance.It is against Nintendo's user policies to modify the hardware in any way for any purpose.
Assuming you ripped the game yourself. But what does the law have to do with eBay policies?Cool, still not illegal by law. Nor is playing bought games emulated, for instance.
Who was talking about eBay policies?Assuming you ripped the game yourself. But what does the law have to do with eBay policies?
The whole thread is about Nintendo and eBay policy. Not the law.
I think you need to reread the whole chainThe whole thread is about Nintendo and eBay policy. Not the law.
I'm assuming OP is in the US.
Key here is that OP's listing wasn't taken down because of the above policy. OP's listing was taken down because Nintendo's agent made a claim that it was infringing Nintendo's IP (a direct claim that OP was violating the law).
What is this thread about?
It is well known that eBay has it even in their policy that mentioning something like modifying is not allowed.
So just put it up again without this part.