There are people here that were bragging about doing this to.Thanks to all the people abusing the regional pricing, what a shame.
.Thanks to all the people abusing the regional pricing, what a shame.
It's only for Nintendo games so you can still exploit indie devs.It was fun while it lasted. Sucks for those people living there, would've expected them to crack down on the location switching instead.
I'll have to see the exact pricing differences but I knew this would happen and it would make me sell my Switch. The cheap ass indies was the biggest use that I got out of the system.
This is for Nintendo games only though..not indies.It was fun while it lasted. Sucks for those people living there, would've expected them to crack down on the location switching instead.
I'll have to see the exact pricing differences but I knew this would happen and it would make me sell my Switch. The cheap ass indies was the biggest use that I got out of the system.
I'm sorry but why is it abuse for people to get the best deal when shopping for games.Thanks to all the people abusing the regional pricing, what a shame.
Era motto: you must buy the most expensive games available anywhere in order to help developers.I'm sorry but why is it abuse for people to get the best deal when shopping for games.
Why should I feel bad for getting the best price I can?
Pretty much. Bought games digitally on the SA (And sometimes Russia) out of convenience, but I could have got them physically for the same price and will do so in the future. (Just don't buy them in GAME, that place is ridiculously expensive)The silly thing here is, it's not like it was even much cheaper in those shops really. They were basically equivalent to normal retail prices in EU for physical copies.
Just means less people will buy digtal really. Prices are stupid in comparison to Physical.
I'm sorry but why is it abuse for people to get the best deal when shopping for games.
Why should I feel bad for getting the best price I can?
Regional pricing differences exist to reflect the reality of variable standards of living that exist between countries and continents. Lower prices in a region that is not your own generally indicate that the average wage earned in that region is relatively lower. (I'm aware there are additional concerns, e.g. relative piracy rates, that have been a guiding factor for some digital stores' pricing policies.)I'm sorry but why is it abuse for people to get the best deal when shopping for games.
Why should I feel bad for getting the best price I can?
This happened to the Mexican eshop? They still have cheaper games than the US. I recently bought into the breach for about $5 usd on the Mexican eshopI just want to point out that the news only mentions Nintendo published games, so third party games are supposedly gonna maintain their current price.
I'm sorry but why is it abuse for people to get the best deal when shopping for games.
Why should I feel bad for getting the best price I can?
I mean sure, but I think their point is why blame the consumers taking advantage of globalisation and not the company?Regional pricing differences exist to reflect the reality of variable standards of living that exist between countries and continents. Lower prices in a region that is not your own generally indicate that the average wage earned in that region is relatively lower.
I don't have a huge problem with an individual consumer exploiting that; usually, I'd imagine that anybody well off enough to not mind paying slightly extra wouldn't bother with the extra work involved in circumventing their region's prices. On the other hand, the end result here is that SA and RU customers get shafted.
Well as I said in my post above. The stupid thing about this change is, they weren't that much cheaper. They were basically equivalent to the price Europeans pay for physical copies in most retail stores(excluding the expensive high street ones like GAME).I noticed that Nintendo published games were almost never cheaper when looking at other regions though, it was only indie games that ever had lower prices, so how would the abuse of cheaper prices for indies make them raise prices for first party content?
I really hate the idea that only big corporations are allowed to use the global market, consumers are shamed for it.
I didn't notice the poster I quoted indicating that contrast, but sure, that's a reasonable question. I guess my answer is that I don't think it's particularly noble when companies do it either. On that line of thought, they're really on different scales. Corporate exploitation destroys lives and communities.I mean sure, but I think their point is why blame the consumers taking advantage of globalisation and not the company?
It's always big companies who shut down these avenues, the same big companies that take advantage of globalisation every single day themselves, but won't dare let anyone else take advantage of it too.
Smash was more expensive in the whole Europe, 69.99€ like BotW