Right, sure, but not on a Sunday and not for BS. Like I said, unless they accessed something they shouldn't using ill gotten means, or broke a contract, the cost of the lawyer on weekend hours is too much.
Going to need to see some receipts on this. A few default profile pic twitter accounts were saying this too but they said they had proof they were on it before other people.
Going to need to see some receipts on this. A few default profile pic twitter accounts were saying this too but they said they had proof they were on it before other people.
I don't even understand how you would get stuff from every company involved in E3 through legal means.Pretty petty of Nintendo but our own Nate Drake thought that maybe Sabi got this info through not so legal means so maybe that has something to do with it
Also, maybe don't advertise on Twitter well in advance that you're going to spoil the shit out of Nintendo's Direct.Don't hack the marketing server next time
Or don't just hurl out all the shit hours before the press conference for Twitter likes
She hacked their servers or something? It's illegal to repost informations?
They have their location on their twitter profile. That likely helps narrow it down and make it easy for a legal firm to find them.
Also, maybe don't advertise on Twitter well in advance that you're going to spoil the shit out of Nintendo's Direct.
How did they get your address from a post in 4chan? Lol
Also, as others have said, as long as you are not under NDA, it's legit reporting thus unenforceable.
As someone who worked for a company much larger than Nintendo and actually saw receipts for lawyers, its not this easy, please, I am not talking from my ass here. I'm not some spring chicken naive to the world. The cost of bluffing one twitter user isn't worth it unless it can materially impact the course of business. No one in the corporate offices in Japan is even noticing this shit. If a retained lawyers office sent an email, however they got that information, it was probably sent by a junior associate doing it on their own.Nintendo is a very large corporation so they have a huge pool of legal aid available 24/7. It costs them nothing but effort to go after this person and they have everything to gain by maintaining the surprise. They just need the bluff to work for a couple days.
Sabi is most likely the most legit leaker in the history of gaming.I don't know. Is this twitter person famous or something? Like anyone can confirm someone else's stuff.
I really hoped that they were a legit leaker and not a reposter.
But what about that sweet internet clout and 15 minutes of fame?GAF, not 4chan -- they got my address from my domain registrar where I posted the gif. It was just that gif and a brief summary of the vidoc so I wasn't really worried about it but I got a C&D letter and a call from one of their lawyers. For a 2-3 second gif of what amounts to a commercial
My point is that neither getting a C&D nor acting on it tells you anything about whether they are under NDA. It doesn't matter if it is enforceable or not. Do you want to go to court to defend your right to post BS on the internet? I didn't and I don't know why you would unless you are getting paid for it
The leaker didn't mention ghostwire though.She stole the leaks from here
She just stole everything that guy said 20 hours ago
companies, especially ones like Nintendo, aren't in the business of calling up their lawyers on retainer and spending this kind of money on a Sunday to blast a random twitter person.
It's either fabricated bs, or they accessed something that could potentially be considered illegal, or they are breaking some kind of contract. Its not like this twitter person was big enough at all. Its also not Nintendo's mo to go after this nonsense like this.
Like this wouldn't be worth the cost of the lawyer to deal with.
Regardless of the validity of their leaks or not, this is just dumb, and to blindly believe it is silly. It seems more so like plausible deniability to not have actual information, can't leak shit you aint got.
She posted some of that information before Vergeben. I think both were privy to some of the same info, but she got exact wording correctly on Microsoft's Scarlett video so she knew someone who had access to that video.They stole the leaks from here
She just stole everything that guy said
Yeah. It was all done poorly and each bit on info shared narrowed things down. Flaunting when they would post Nintendo information would have made things easy for Nintendo to track. If anything, they are lucky Bamco, Square, MS, Ubisoft, and the others haven't acted yet.Its not petty if the leak is what some of us think it is.
This has been brazen stupidity for 15 minutes of fame.
No they didn't. Sabi posted a lot of things before that, and also things not included there.She stole the leaks from here
She just stole everything that guy said 20 hours ago
That would be literally any leaker. But they do give hype for people are into leaks such as myselfPerson literally gains nothing from leaking aside from being an asshole.
I can guarantee you that those lawyers are not working in the US on a Sunday night. I am willing to cede that it could be due to other means, but we automatically assume this person is telling the truth, I think it is silly, and its just using an easy villain to pick out because hey we can all see NIntendo ninjas and shit, and yeah I can see Nintendo being petty like that, I just find it far fetched.Do you honestly think that Nintendo doesn't have their own lawyers that are salaried to work for them?
Cue the criticism of Nintendo for being protective of their property.
Right. We hardly see Nintendo send out C&D's and such for majority of leaks, the last time something like that ever happened was when SMD64 leaked everything he had on GAF and on his site which included information about Pokemon Sun and Moon, other games, it even included financial information, etc. He was reckless, got C&D'd, his site was nuked, and he was forced to sign an NDA, and he got his source fired.companies, especially ones like Nintendo, aren't in the business of calling up their lawyers on retainer and spending this kind of money on a Sunday to blast a random twitter person.
It's either fabricated bs, or they accessed something that could potentially be considered illegal, or they are breaking some kind of contract. Its not like this twitter person was big enough at all. Its also not Nintendo's mo to go after this nonsense like this.
Like this wouldn't be worth the cost of the lawyer to deal with.
Regardless of the validity of their leaks or not, this is just dumb, and to blindly believe it is silly. It seems more so like plausible deniability to not have actual information, can't leak shit you aint got.
It's funny; Vergeben actually "stole" some of the information Sabi posted on Twitter themselves.She stole the leaks from here
She just stole everything that guy said 20 hours ago
Its remarkably easy to find out people's personal information with a few Google searchesKind of terrifying they can find your name/address with a little investigation and send a lawyer. Assuming their account isnt made with their personal info there on display for twitter to share.
I can guarantee you that those lawyers are not working in the US on a Sunday night.
Pretty much everything not part of the Nintendo Direct. Sabi has been threatening/bragging that she was going to leak the Direct for the past few days and Nintendo has now apparently shut that down.